Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm conducting a little family game (in various countries)based on guessing the scores of each team in the RWC this w/end.


Points are accumulated from the distance your guess is to the actual score. I'm trying to put this on a spreadsheet for simplicity. However if I use a simple calculation of deducting the actual less the guessed score I'm likely to get a plus or minus figure eg Wales score 10 points. One guess is 15, their score is 5. Another guess is 7 so their score is 3. However using the same calculation for the first one the result would be -3.


Is there a way to make all answers positive regardless of the figure being above or below a certain number?


Don't go to a lot of trouble if there isn't a simple answer. Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19940-excel-expert-please/
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Another small problem.I'd be grateful for help.


I cut and pasted two columns of figures from the company software to a spreadsheet. In a third column I want to compare the first two columns for differences or not as the case may be.


I can do this if I'm just using figures which weren't imported as in A1-B1=C1


However something is stopping that happening which I'm sure is due to the importation in that there is something in the cells other than the figures, which doesn't allow the normal formula to work.


Can someone explain what I need to do to purge the cells of whatever it is and leave me just with the imported figures. I could spend hours figuring it out but I need to do something in a hurry.


Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...