Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw something quite disturbing this am!


I was in the changing rooms at work getting dressed and some old boy 60ish was also getting changed....not that I was looking! but i noticed out of the corner of my eye some bizarre shirt tucking behaviour! He tucked his shirt into his underpants!!!, and then proceded to put his trousers on!


i have never witnessed this shirt tucking into underpants method before?! does it serve some kind of purpose? Does anyone in ED do this also?


It made me crack up in the changing room...and i had to make it look like I was choking/coughing!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1994-bizarre-shirt-tucking-behaviour/
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a very disturbing thread.

> FnB, feel free to pop over to play with my wii,

> but keep your hands out of my pants!!


You two scare me..... ;-)


I was in the TA and when on parade in the summer, shirt sleave order, doing this means the shirt stay straighter, and you don;t get bollocked for looking "Like a sack of $hit tied up with string". Though something other hideous misdemeanour such as a badly ironed collar woudl see the bvollocking ensued anyway.


He might have a service history...


It's logical, but uncomfortable, I must say.


E

That's quite interesting if it does have a functional use then.


I've often wondered how some people are able to keep their shirts tucked in neat and tidy without it 'puffing' out....I may actually give this a go too now that there is a functional reason for it!

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I may actually give this a go too now that there is a functional reason for it!


You'll be hooked for life...mark my words.....


Word of warning though, when untucking, exercise a degree of caution. It is all to easy to self wedgie if you're a bit too enthusiastic with you untucking..... =8-0

Rather that, than leaving shirts untucked. I'm talking the long sleeved variety. I have a real problem with it, no logical idea why. Perhaps it's a gay gene thing.


I used to know somebody who tucked his in, so that it wouldn't come out at the back. Remember John Forsythe from Dynasty, a secret underpant tucker-iner.

Only looks ridiculous if someone is watching you do it, or see's you take your trousers off (and you've forgotten to pull out the shirt first).


Obviously not to be done if you've scored with a young lady (not sure how it would go down in the gay community cdonline?!) and you're undressing in the throw's of passion - I think that would be a real bedroom killer!

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only looks ridiculous if someone is watching you

> do it, or see's you take your trousers off


Technique would be, I imagine I have no experience of such a specific situation, would be to undo the shirt from the top, (Ti*'s first I'm no slag...) while claiming "kiss my chest you mad passionate fool" and take it off without untucking it.


Then whilest said chest is being kissed you can carefully untuck it yourself while maybe uttering "Of your kisses are like Ice to my fire" to keep partner distracted...being careful of course to avoid self induced wedgie, as mentioned previously....


I hope this helps someone....

its actually an old legacy from the days of yore when washing machines were a thing of the future,and basically so a man could get the maximum of 4 days wear from a pair of jocks ie wear for 2 days then turn inside out and wear for another 2 days,tucking your shirt into said same jocks prevented unsightly skid marks from appearing on the jocks and hence staining their appearance, not very nice in the morning when parading around the house and the missus has to look at it whilst devouring her porridge. that the skid mark was transferred to the shirt tail was irrelevant as the offending article was tucked into the jocks and consequently was,nt available for anyone to see. same principle also applies if you tuck the front of the shirt in, no piss stains.

hope that clears things up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
    • Weve used EE for the past 6 years. We're next to Peckham Rye. It's consistent and we've never had any outages or technical issues. We watch live streams for football and suffer no lags or buffering.   All the best.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...