Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yanlizkurt has his/her national Turkish flag flying as a signature to his/her posts. If I was to do the same with the Cross Of St George (not, I hesitate to say, that I have any intention of doing so) would people assume I was some sort of overly patriotic, jingoistic, right wing bigot? Or someone that takes pride in thier own flag? Or what?

Answers please.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1991-flying-the-flag/
Share on other sites

Of course you Nazi!!


On which note I have to say I'm a bit uncomfortable with that. I like the clean look of the forum, so many others are rendered unreadable by moving gifs and ridiculous emoticons and all sorts.

Hence why I kept the fave albums as neat as possible, otherwise things become frankly unusable.


 

I avoid flags myself - and mine isn't as associated with "overly patriotic, jingoistic, right wing bigot"s as some others (rightly or wrongly)


I'll support my country's team when it's playing (not a problem next year now - tch) as I like football and it's tribal - but flags (of any country) are appropriated by all sorts of people I'm not happy with.


Where my parents lived when I was born has nothing to do with me - the world is (thankfully) a far bigger, better and more interesting place than that place so associating myself with a flag doesn't appeal


And IF England don't qualify tonight then you can bet that the people who get very aggressive to foreigners in the West End or wherever WILL be decked out in their flag.

It is a pity that St George?s flag has been hijacked by extremists. I don?t think anyone should have to feel apologetic for being proud of being English.


- This coming from someone from 2 very un-English backgrounds. But I have made a conscious choice to live in England and feel it would be downright rude not to lend my support to the national sense of identity. Even if supporting their sports teams has made me age prematurely.

I think some people might think you were a nationalistic yob, but more, probably, would just think you were a bit barmy and not understand why you'd want to do it.

And when people say 'I'm proud to be British/tall/ginger/black' it bugs me. How can you be proud of an accident of birth? Be glad and pleased, but not proud. I think it's ok to be proud of your achievements, but not something you have absolutely no control over. What say others? Nero

thought I'd turned off the signature! arse.


I'm not against flags, or waving them at sporting events or national occasions, or whenever eles it is one waves ones flag. Adds a bit of colour to the occasion. fun to do. probably gives one a sense of belonging too.


I think it's sad that the flag of st. george (and I'm sure other flags in other countries) are associated with idiots, but I don't see why the rest of us shouldn't wave them guilt free. And I have to disagree with sean, when england loose tonight, yes, the rabble will be waving union jacks, st.georges etc, as well as chelsea, millwall and west ham flags, but so will most other fans. the ones who shurg, say 'well, it was going to happen' and then go home. f the flag has nowt to do with it.


I dont look like that.

Sean, you always seem to come up with the good answers and I agree with what you say there. Not that I entirely agree with you all the time on other things. That would be boring. But am I the only person that finds people waving their national flag a little...pathetic and....ooh... erm a tad offensive. I suppose it depends on the type of person doing the flag waving and for what reason doesn't it?

There is something charming about these big old England fans trotted out at big Footie events with "Throcking Utd" or "Badgersfield Ladies U21" scrawled on them.


I think I've one of them somewhere too I took in chicago a couple of years back; a little more tastefully shall we...

 

Why should you feel you have to justify yourself for attaching a flag of St George to your messages. Go for it. We should all be proud of our roots.


I seem to recall Southwark council stating that it might prosecute residents of the borough for flying the flag of St George, during Euro 2006 ( I think) as they fely it might cause offence to other nationalities. As usual they got it totally wrong, one rule for one group and one rule for another. I notice that they said nothing about prosecuting other residents who might want to fly flags of other nations, I suppose they assume that it is only the flag of St George that can upset people.

It's a sad thing, but basically the type of place where you see St George's cross hanging outside houses is The Brook Estate or Middlepark Estate in Eltham (I know, I have to visit these estates). Now the majority of people living here are lovely, nice people, who would only fly the flag out of pride in their footballing nation.


However, it is, at the end of the day, Steven Lawrence country, and there are some nasty gits living around there! A good friend of mine is a policeman who covers the Brook estate, and he tells me every house put on the market there belongs to a black or asian family, and there are very few of these families left around there.


Bloody shame! I hate walking around these places.

Ooh Keef you took the steam out of my next post! -


That's what I was going to say - and spot on....


Of course it isn't the flag that CAUSES these things but it has become an umbrella for people with a less that outward-looking view of the world. Nor is England alone of course. Many countries are blighted by the same disease. But everywhere it exists, these people gather around their flag....

"now, is that a photo of a bunch of nice people having fun, or drunken yobbos waiting for a ruck?"


I didn't spot any trouble, but then I left the game, went to an open air concert and had a meal in a nice restaurant (with terrible service obviously, I think the waiter had an issue with the English).


There was plenty of trouble on the way over. I got an Air India flight that was delayed long enough for a bunch of England Shirt clad thugs to be drunk enough to be mouthing loudly about how the pane was full of effing p*kis trying to take our jobs, and generally not being ambassadors for our nation.

Don't book an Air India* flight next time you ignorant c*nts!!


Proud of that? You're having a laugh.


*I felt pointing out the obvious inaccuracy would have been a futile and unappreciated exercise in pedantry and may well have resulted in my being beaten senseless. We reported them instead and got the most vocal one shoved in a room to sober up. He missed his flight ho ho ho.


*edited for hand holding purposes*

I know, but it's clearly when!


I think it's sad that we all feel this way. We seem to be stuck on football here. Flags are waved at other events, I doubt anybody has problems with them then (rugby springs to mind), but I suppose football is the national sport. I'd say the majority waving flags aren't trouble makers, and that the flag is immaterial. Thugs can only claim the flag for themselves if we let them (a bit simple I know). Why should I feel bad about a flag (be it national, or for my local team) because some wankers use it too? And I bet it's a weird english thing that we do so well. Doubt other nations have quite the same attitude.


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/109/434182096_86ae61ff77.jpg?v=0


I bet this image doesn't stir up 'oh, look at 'em thug' emotions.


too big a photo pants. sorry.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...