Jump to content

Being held to ransom (by a builder)


clarinet

Recommended Posts

Duplice thread is here http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1953077


Please can anybody help....We've had a loft conversion done and have been really unhappy with the way in which the builder has spoken to us and dealt with the project. Basically ran way over time. Although the builder did say they would fix a few things I put it all in writing as per the advice of the CAB. Now the builder refuses to remove the scaffolding until all money is paid upfront which is basically breaking our contract which clearly states I can keep up to 5% of the cost until three months after the build. Feel like we are being held to ransom. Anybody got any ideas. And yes, it is a local company so be warned. They put FMB logo on their paperwork but aren't actually members. Come across as being super friendly at the beginning but then just take the money as quickly as possible at the beginning and then just leave you hanging.....I've been to the CAB but just wondering if anybody else has had similar?....

I'm not sure if they are. Just need to know if it is illegal to demand full payment without a) finishing the job and b) removing the scaffolding. They've broken contract. Need some clear legal advice and/or hear from people who've had a similar experience.

Once you have paid the money, you are stuffed.


Make them stick to the contract, otherwise what was the point of having one?


Some solicitors used to give a free initial consultation, don't know if they still do.


The CAB should be able to give you names of local solicitors if that scheme still exists.


ETA: It would help others to avoid them if you posted their name up here?


Also some others may have had similar experiences with this company, and could advise?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Houses subject to these taxes aren't the average house though either.    They are ordinary houses that just happen to be marginally more expensive than the ones the Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer each rent out. 
    • ??? Average London house prices in 1970 (from land registry) = £5190, £72,000 in today's money. London houses were getting on for 5 times the national average wage in 1970, if we used that as a formula that would be around £200k for an average London house today.    
    • The average house in London was nothing like £68k in the sixties.  I suspect our fictional hard done by ED pensioner probably paid something more like £6k.  Also your interest calculations are  abit dodgy.  Our pensioner did not buy the house for £2m so would not be paying anything like that interest.    As for more recent buyers, I doubt many purchasers of £2m houses are doing so with a 95% mortgage. @Ebenezer I agree with CGT on primary residences. There are a few ways to cut this bit the fact remains housing wealth has been  massively undertaxed and it is a growing source of intergenerational inequality.
    • Cost of Covid to government estimated at £400 billion Cost to the economy of leaving Europe estimated at  £32 billion a year  Cost  to UK due to Russia invading Ukraine £100 Billion plus Some analyses suggest that by 2018/19, austerity had suppressed the economy by nearly £100 billion, equivalent to over £3,600 per household, and led to a 2% reduction in GDP by 2015. The long-term effects include a weaker economy, lower wages, and a failure to reduce the fiscal deficit as effectively as intended, partly because lower growth reduced tax revenues You can do the maths yourself
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...