Jump to content

Being held to ransom (by a builder)


clarinet

Recommended Posts

Duplice thread is here http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1953077


Please can anybody help....We've had a loft conversion done and have been really unhappy with the way in which the builder has spoken to us and dealt with the project. Basically ran way over time. Although the builder did say they would fix a few things I put it all in writing as per the advice of the CAB. Now the builder refuses to remove the scaffolding until all money is paid upfront which is basically breaking our contract which clearly states I can keep up to 5% of the cost until three months after the build. Feel like we are being held to ransom. Anybody got any ideas. And yes, it is a local company so be warned. They put FMB logo on their paperwork but aren't actually members. Come across as being super friendly at the beginning but then just take the money as quickly as possible at the beginning and then just leave you hanging.....I've been to the CAB but just wondering if anybody else has had similar?....

I'm not sure if they are. Just need to know if it is illegal to demand full payment without a) finishing the job and b) removing the scaffolding. They've broken contract. Need some clear legal advice and/or hear from people who've had a similar experience.

Once you have paid the money, you are stuffed.


Make them stick to the contract, otherwise what was the point of having one?


Some solicitors used to give a free initial consultation, don't know if they still do.


The CAB should be able to give you names of local solicitors if that scheme still exists.


ETA: It would help others to avoid them if you posted their name up here?


Also some others may have had similar experiences with this company, and could advise?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...