Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I chatted to some of the neighbours... apparently the council removed the tree because it died and then a fox dug the hole. The residents don't think a new replacement tree will work out because the pavement is too narrow due to the wheelie bins, which can't go anywhere else because of the way the basement flats are laid out (sad face).


I'm in fairly regular contact with the council tree officers, so I'll let them know about the hole to see if it can be tarmacked over.

In the meantime, I took a photo of the fox hole pit and sent it to the council tree officer and he has now requested for the highways dept to "cap" the pit (which means to tarmac or cement it over) so that no one trips over it.


Can someone let me know when this happens??

I would love trees on the pavements of Ashbourne Grove at the Melbourne Grove end. Sadly the huge trees are going to be cut down when the building works start at 54. It will seem very bare at the bottom end of the road without anything at all.


RCH can you put in a request, how does it work? The wouldn't be able to be planted for a while as yet.

Hi 1921... is this the house on the corner of Ashbourne and Melbourne? I think the trees there are on private property and also have restrictions on chopping them down, but we'll have to see what the planning officers decide.


I think I've seen discussions about allocating funding for street trees along there to compensate, but it may be necessary to wait and see how it goes and then plan accordingly.


I'm just down the road, so let's stay in touch and I'll help you guys negotiate through the system as best I can!

Hi Sue... there are so many layers of complexity to tree replacements, that everything depends on the specifics of the location.


A lot of residents are opting to replace dead trees with smaller species in order to keep the green feel of a road, but without blocking sunlight.


This is actually one of the most fascinating aspects of street tree planting that I enjoy! Shame we didn't know each other back then...


But, depending on the type of tree, you may be able to ask the council to do a crown reduction (a lowering and thinning of the crown) on it, which will help... the only problem with this solution is that it will have to be repeated every few years as the tree grows back, which will incur regular internal budget expenditure...

Update to 1921... I walked round there again and realised that 54 isn't on the corner, but across the road.


I can see exactly what your concerns are... fortunately the pavement is wide enough to accommodate taller tree to replace the internal trees on the property, but the developer may object to the "obstruction".


Let's wait and see what happens as the site gets developed... I haven't seen the planning approval document, but I suspect that the developer will opt to keep at least one internal tree, which will indicate where pavement trees could possibly be planted.

I haven't seen the planning approval document, but I suspect that the developer will opt to keep at least one internal tree,


Depending on the state of the trees here it is quite possible for planners to require all the trees to be kept. It may well not be just up to the developer. Trees, even on private ground, are seen as a public amenity and may well, in some boroughs though not I fear ours, have automatic tree preservation orders on them dependent on their girth.

Hi Sue... Normally birches aren't crown reduced - usually bigger trees such as planes and chestnuts - but we can ask. Ironically, most neighbourhoods tend to chose birches as a "medium" tree specifically because it tends not to block light. But it depends on the angle of the sun and location of the tree.


The best thing is for you to put in a request to the council (I think you can do it via the Environment email link) and I can also try to ask the tree officer in tandem.


Can you PM me the location of the tree, as this could make a difference to the argument?

  • 2 weeks later...

Well.


As of this afternoon, I have been told that the cracks all over my front bay and down the sides of its windows are due to subsidence and are "100%" due to the Birch street tree outside my house.


Somebody will shortly be coming along and investigating re the roots.


So I imagine the tree will have to be removed.


So the blocking out of the sun is now the least of my problems :(


I gather similar cases are arising all over this area, following the heat wave :(

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, the heatwave makes it sound more like

> cracking in the subsoil and below due to the

> moisture content decreasing ? which is the cause

> of most London subsidence. And birch roots are

> very shallow. Further investigation need, I think.



The guy I spoke to on the phone was going on a video which somebody who came last week made, inside and outside, so they are coming to investigate further (digging down to the tree roots).


The video maker told me it was highly unlikely to be the tree because neither of the adjoining houses has similar cracks.


However today's person (can't remember whether he said he was a structural surveyor or a structural engineer) said that the tree roots would have drawn the moisture out of the soil. He said the person who made the video was a technician and implied that his own view was superior to the technician's opinion.


My main concern is that the cracks are getting wider and I'm worried the windows may fall out :( Because of the number of claims due to the heatwave, things are taking longer to investigate and resolve.


The guy said I may have to have the front of the house propped up temporarily, AAAAAAARRRRRGGGGGGHHHHH :(:( :(


ETA: Anyway, they are sending me a letter which may (or may not) shed more light.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is possible that the foundations of the bay are

> not so deep as to those of the house.

>

> May not be as serious as it looks. ???

> But the bay will still need to be rebuilt.



Yes the foundations of the bay are different. That's why only the bay is affected, presumably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Very sad to see H&B on LL. Will still go to Health Matters! 
    • H&B Is coming to Lordship Lane  It will be next to the Large St Christophers in Lordship Lane Also just to confirm that Oliver Bonas is taking over the 2 white stuff shops (i spoke to the builders yesterday and they confirmed they are breaking through to combine all three shops)
    • So here we go again, but with a proposal for a bigger and longer event. This despite the massive failings (again) last year with serious & long lasting damage to our park throughout the summer, lack of effective waste management, widespread public nuisance by the attendees, and of course the noise. Every year GALA are set conditions for their event licence, every year they fail to meet them, then every year they are granted a licence again - depressing. First impressions from the site plan - the proposed footprint has increased dramatically, sprawling further down & across our park (image attached with 2024 footprint in orange & 2025 extension in red). There  will be a music stage within 50m of our front room. The entrance area will be on a sports pitch. The trackway for heavy plant access will be across two sports fields. The entrance / exit for heavy plant will be opposite a school. The road at that point is regularly gridlocked due to parked & waiting cars. Increased trackway = increased damage to grass. I'm sure there's plenty more that is unacceptable... It's clear that we all need to comment on this consultation, but it's not clear how to actually add comments / participate. The email & consultation document both direct you to the GALA page on the council website - www.southwark.gov.uk/Gala2025 - but this only has details of the GALA PR sessions, not the official consultation. I've raised this with the council, I'll post if I get a response. I've also raised the issue that the council's Outdoor Event Policy states that "Applications for major events must be submitted a minimum of nine months prior to the event start date.", which would have been August 29th 2024 for this application. This is apparently necessary to give sufficient time for things like consultations...
    • I'm sorry to see another chain opening up in the form of Holland and Barratt a couple of doors up from SMBS.  That will be another unfair pressure on SMBS .  I really hope people continue to support SMBS and its relative shop The Cheese Block under huge pressure with the arrival of Mons and Bora.  These are two of the oldest surviving (30 years plus?) green grocers, deli and unusual ingredient food shops in Lordship Lane and made it an interesting high street long before the chains and  newbies moved in.  I would think Healthmatters is none too happy either 😕 Support your local independent store or Lordship Lane will get really dull 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...