Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see contents insurance as a necessity, not a

> luxury, particularly in London or any big city,

> where there are likely to be more thieves than in

> the country.

>

> iPhones and iMacs, however - they are what I

> would class as luxuries, unless they've dropped in

> price considerably since the last time I looked

> :))

>

> Also - how did they slip the latch? Does your door

> not have a mortice lock? My house insurer insists

> on that, and I would have thought your landlord's

> would. If it does, and he hasn't provided one,

> then surely he is the one to blame here? Though I

> wouldn't have thought his insurance would cover

> your personal possessions anyway, though I may be

> wrong.


Well I guess maybe that's where we differ then! In my experience, even after having to fork out for all the rising uni-fees and material costs, iMacs and MacBooks etc unfortunately do become more of a necessity than a luxury.


The landlords insurance only covers the property in case of a "forced" entry, which apparently isn't this. The landlords insurance doesn't cover his lodgers property anyway.


Thanks for your advice, he's taking it all on the chin and knows how to better prepare in the future!

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm really sorry to hear about what happened and

> it's maddening to hear that the police can't even

> be arsed to do anything about it, or are unable to

> due to lack of funding or maybe their rules state

> they aren't to pursue this kind of thing, I have

> no idea, I get the feeling that most police would

> like to help and do more but are unable to do so

> due to how they are governed. Either way, it sucks

> : (


I know, it's very frustrating- but I have to keep reminding myself (and him) that it must be even more frustrating for the police in some ways who aren't even able to pursue their jobs properly and prevent crime due to flaws and loopholes in the system!!!


> Regarding archives and backups, when choosing an

> option, I highly recommend your boyfriend takes a

> look into the following sub on reddit. He might

> also want to build a NAS for your home, and

> another identical one for his parents or trusted

> friend or relation that he can also send backups

> to. If the company he has a plan with doesn't have

> adequate emergency planing, or indeed, simply goes

> bust, taking all the data with them, it's good to

> have that always recommended third copy of

> everything in place.


Oh wow, thanks for this! Quite interesting, i'll definitely get him to do some research and check out the sub on reddit.


> I know it's an extra expense, but, sadly I guess

> he's unfortunately learnt first hand that without

> an offiste backup, your data is about as safe as a

> biscuit at a tea party.


Great analogy- Yes he has, onwards and upwards!

Robert Poste's Child - my thoughts exactly. The crime has now been assigned to a specific officer 'dealing with the case' who he is yet to hear from. In the meantime, we feel that with the knowledge that we believe we have with regards to the tracker, this only encourages people to take matters into their own hands, and in some ways encourages further crime?!


ianr- luckily (or unluckily depending on how you look at it), one of the few things they didn't steal was his mobile so standing outside and ringing would not help in this case. As Robert Poste's Child and Kid Kruger have said, we are very close to making a move and knocking and asking to buy it back!!!

This happened- not in this area -but fairly recently.

A relative was spat at and she chased the spitter and found her getting into a car. The reg was passed to the cops and they tried to follow it up but did not find the spitter at home (where the car was registered)on 2 occasions so they visited my relative and told her and left a piece of paper with details on it.....

p.s for the benefit of rh it is the absolute truth

theron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

In

> my experience, even after having to fork out for

> all the rising uni-fees and material costs, iMacs

> and MacBooks etc unfortunately do become more of a

> necessity than a luxury.

>



Of course as a student you need a laptop and mobile.


I wouldn't have thought, however, you needed the most expensive kind, and Macs and iPhones are top end aka luxury end, no?

> one of the few things they didn't steal was his mobile so

> standing outside and ringing would not help in this case.


My mistake. I haven't got my head fully round the differences between iThingies yet. It's only fairly recently I got William and Henry^WHarry sorted.


In Dock Green, PC Dixon would of course have been having a knock on their door anyway, for a quiet chat. I don't think there's any law preventing the Met from doing that. I can imagine it possibly having some benefits, but also being seen as otherwise -- ie v. unlikely to lead to a charge, and would put the possible perps more on their guard.


Checking the local full electoral register for the names of the occupiers might be productive. Have there been any more recent sightings of the goods?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> theron Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> In

> > my experience, even after having to fork out

> for

> > all the rising uni-fees and material costs,

> iMacs

> > and MacBooks etc unfortunately do become more of

> a

> > necessity than a luxury.

> >

>

>

> Of course as a student you need a laptop and

> mobile.

>

> I wouldn't have thought, however, you needed the

> most expensive kind, and Macs and iPhones are top

> end aka luxury end, no?


In my opinion Art degrees are slightly different I'm afraid!

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Checking the local full electoral register for the

> names of the occupiers might be productive. Have

> there been any more recent sightings of the goods?


Good idea! I walked past the house in question a few times this morning to suss it out. I managed to speak to the next door neighbours who said they rarely saw the people who lived their. Chickened out of knocking on the door or anything like that but checked the surrounding areas for the hard drive- wishful thinking right!

  • 1 year later...

Kleeeniks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's why there are insurances for the houses.

> It's not only for the house but also for all the

> goods that are inside the house. I want to take

> soon an insurance so I was reading about them.

> After a Google search, I end up on this site

> (https://homeownersinsurancecover.net/virginia/)

> where they talk about house insurances. So I found

> out that a good insurance will cover all your

> goods that are inside the property from theft or

> damage. It's bad that you didn't have one. Now if

> the police won't find them, say bye-bye.



Insurance can't return your data - only a backup can do that.


I haven't heard of many final PhD theses being lost recently (you used to in the 90s).

The moral of this whole tale is ?crime does pay?

The police are not interested in crime as they are unable to cope do so it seems

Criminals have a free hand. Consequently insurers will take your money

But in many (most) cases will not pay out.


It seems outrageous when a bit of investigation could resolve things but

It wont happen.

Bit of a blanket statement to say that the police aren't interested in crime. Now I am not a fan of the filth, many of the rozzers that I have come across are racist, narrow minded, little Englanders, worse still living in West Wickham, but I am sure that most are interested in nabbing crims.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd reread what you posted and try to summarise.  It just comes across as a rant.
    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me       Totally off topic, before anyone jumps down my throat.. I just do not get how anyone is proud to be British at this point in time. Whoever is in power, seems to be able to help themselves to the public purse with no redress at all - Covid is a great example of lining of pockets.. Millions  given to Rowanda, so one is led to believe, to help with refugee problem and one can’t get a plane load off!  I simply do not get it at all. Use of food banks in UK growing yearly, homeless as well, nhs, police, fire service etc all on their knees..        
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...