Jump to content

Recommended Posts

petercain0110 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Times move on .. Maybe the Victorians lamented the

> passing of straw huts .. Maybe the Victorians

> would envy the new builds .. I live in a 1902

> building .. I like it .. Never-the-less, a new

> build is undoubtedly better ..



Unless it's this one!

chazzle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For the latest impact (the fifth) the lorry turned

> in at speed and drive about one metre onto the

> pavement. Just bad driving. A bollard should help.



Bad driving! No consolation if you're a member of library staff, a shopper or a pedestrian at that moment!

  • 4 weeks later...

Children going to the library, cars parked up on his work area, vehicles cutting the corner, single lane traffic up to the builders yard. More pedestrian safe space needed as people cannot look.


Before this development there was plenty of room for all.


I hope they do not find reasons to close it.

I tend to agree on your statement quote 'They look quite smart, but don't be fooled!' ....


Modern , a snazzy/trendy way of saying cheap and quick to grab-in the idiotic/foolish young yuppies .


It seems we are 'assimilating' Turkish building designs and standards ....


... new home buyers are doomed !


I agree with some other folk on here saying that proper bricks , really do make our houses homely and inject a certain interesting character :-)

Why would real bricks be better here? They'd be more expensive to repair and will be less thermally efficient than modern construction methods.


My principal complaints about those flats are:

1. No effort to colour match the brick tiles to the attached station building

2. Building a balcony without accompanying protection on the pavement to stop trucks cutting the corner

Alex_b ,


I will keep this short , but I do want to reply before I got to work and forget :-)


BOTH your points are SPOT ON and accurate , but as for the REAL BRICK houses being 'inefficient' well , honestly that is a 'half truth' in my opinion .


Yes , I will agree that modern building designs are 'better' [ noticeable - but not by much - just MY opinion] in keeping noise down (sound-proofing) , insulation (energy efficiency) ....


.... However , I used to live in these old houses , ( and I love it ! ) I know they get damp , mouldy and filled with wood lice etc , but if your tech-savvy and with a good combination of knowing YOUR HISTORY , you can avoid massive heating bills , expensive building repairs and aggravation from your neighbours over noise (except dinner parties !) .


All I can say is , please dont ruin (disapprove) good old stuff for us , there are adults - like myself , kids grown up from the 90's that actually remember what it was like in ED in the old houses , before they 'absorbed' by the rich and affluent . :-)


Anyway that is enough for me on this topic , and I am the kind of guy that could go on for many days , but I am out !


P.S. Southwark Council have lost the plot , and it seems to me they dramatically have lost their 'foresight' intelligence when approving/disapproving building applications ....

...Are they taking bribes ? You never know - maybe .

Just to clarify I'm not against old houses, I grew up in a Victorian house and live in a Victorian house now. Of course they can be improved and you can make them much more thermally efficient.


What I was saying is that if you are building new buildings now, using "real brick" in place of more modern construction methods isn't sensible either from an environmental or cost point of view.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unfortunately Nissan was a disaster of a company when it created your car and still is, and most recently created another combined disaster alliance with Renault. Be aware, the trade value on your car is really low as no one wants to do the work & it's often only when it reaches near scrap value that someone (else) is willing to invest (their money) to try and fix. So if you're willing to front the money and fix your car that (you know) then that is most likely your best option (also understanding that it is outrageous that you should have to replace a CVT gearbox after 50K). If that isn't appealing consider a new Skoda Fabia 1.0 (Auto) on finance if you can't afford cash, it will last 20yrs.... (and avoid cars from the Stellantis group)
    • If you are referring to me, I was using my mobile. Just quoting the post I was replying to would have made no sense without showing my original post as well. I wouldn't have been able to do that on a "real PC" either, assuming I carried one around with me everywhere. It's nothing to do with what I'm using, it's the way the forum is set up to quote posts. I did insert a screenshot showing the keyboard by mistake.
    • You have to book for the Sunday roasts in advance. I have bad memories of once going for a circular  walk around Downe and then trying to eat. The Queens Head staff (and customers)  looked at us as if we were mad for attempting to get a meal without booking. The other pub in the village  reeked of bleach.  We had to  drive around in search of a meal, and ended up at some large pub whose name and location  I have thankfully forgotten. All I remember is the food, which was truly awful. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...