Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southwark Council has said it's carrying out a borough-wide public consultation into whether residents want a long term policy that will mean the parks get turned into burial grounds - or not. Understand that a quesionnaire was supposed to be sent to households in the borough. Has anyone had one?


The Council gets a lot of short term income from turning parks into cemeteries. And a huge long term maintenance bill. But it doesn't have to offer land for burial plots at all. It could save the parks. The only duty is to provide cremation.


They've been eating away at Honor Oak Rec since 1991 - the last time they took a chunk they said it would last for 50 years, but they've come back again after just 9 years to take what's left of the park. When they took the last chunk, they were asked if they were thinking about taking other parks, and one of the senior managers said that Peckham Rye could be used.


First they came for Honor Oak Rec....

i filled out the petition online against the Honor Oak plan - it was on both Lewisham and Southwark council sites but I never saw it come through the door.


the problem with councils providing burial space is that it means no space then for the living to exercise and enjoy greenery. (outside of cemeteries!)


Look at a map and it's amazing how much space in a very small radius goes to Camberwell Old Cemetery, Camberwell New Cemetery, Nunhead Cemetery, Honor Oak, Ladywell and I'm probably forgetting others. Together they must be larger than all of the parks in the same area.

But it is worth recalling that the land was originally purchased and planned as a burial ground - it only became a recreation ground for the interim until demand required its use. In some ways an excellent example of long term planning on the part of the council back in the 50s (or perhaps earlier/later?).

Mick Mac - sure things have changed - but death remains inevitable and while fewer people are being buried demand remains high and I see no reason why land purchased for that purpose shouldn't be used for that purpose.


Personally I'm going to be burnt with the waste disposed of at sea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The person behind the till won't know about whether or not an assignment of their lease has been purchased by a company like Tesco.  Poundland was sold for a nominal fee so it's unsurprising that the location may close soon. As well, for what it's worth, someone working in the shop is likely to have their job impacted by the shop closing, so having loads of people going and asking them about the potential closing of their shop isn't really nice. "Hey, hear you'll be out of a job soon. Know much about that?" The best resource you all should be using for queries about planning details of new shops is the council's website. As was stated on the first page of this post, there's an application lodged for multiple changes at 29-35 Lordship Lane with the client as Tesco. They wouldn't lodge these plans unless it was happening, or at least extremely likely to happen.    The application is on the council's website here: https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=SVW246KBKF500&activeTab=summary 
    • It's a notice about a licence, but the only name on it is Poundland.
    • What did the notice on the front door say? The planning applications currently being considered clearly refer to Tesco Stores Ltd.  The signage for above the entrance says "Tesco Express". I can't imagine the two companies combining in the same space 😉  
    • I will find out. Haven't been up there yet!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...