Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James you said

"Lastly the idea and title of the event was bonkers - which strangely is what the press actually picked up on. I spoke to a number of reporters explaining our total position but they plucked out this point."


I have attached your press release which was sent to journod. The phrase "politically correct" is in the title, the first line and the first line of the quote so for you to claim that journos picked up on this theme by themselves is completely disingenous.


Also you said


"Instead of the traditional bonfire and fireworks" - there will be traditional fireworks. The last council-run bonfire was held in 2002 there hasnt been one since then because they kept leading to riots.


"they are blowing ?55,000 at the same time as cutting funds for our local youth groups. We have been eeking along down here in Dulwich with patchy youth provision leaving our young people in the lurch. This is why we balk when we see large sums being spent on something ephemeral. The bottom line is that the basic needs of our young people aren't being met, which is a situation that we must remedy." - clearly they never wanted any money to be spent on an event in dulwich preferring it to be spent on youth provision so you cant now start calling for the money to go to Dulwich Festival!

That's exactly where James got things so wrong this time...events funding is a borough wide scheme but he treated it like it was a local funding issue...that somehow the money would still be spent locally if it was cancelled! And he didn't exactly say 'no comment' when the wider press came calling to give him the opportunity to play career politician and knock Labour, and then wonders why the Labour controlled council won't be listening to any of his ideas on events funding anytime soon.


Of course money can always be spent on something else....half of the all the money spent by councils might be better spent in other departments....but for me that's a pointless discussion to have now. The time to argue the toss on what money is allocated where is when the council sets it's budget at the beginning of it's fiscal year. The fact is that there is

78k or whatever available for larger events and it's now not going to be spent in Dulwich.

Lastly the idea and title of the event was bonkers


The e-dealer coveref my point about political correctness, which, James, you have chosen not to answer. So I think we can just accept that that was arrant nonsense designed to get the press excited, and in fact there was nothing remotely politically correct (or incorrect for that matter) about the planned event.


My other question would be, do you know whether the planned event had some kind of narrative theme, did it tell a story about the loss of colour, or was it just a firework display? And did you bother to find out? If it told a story, stories have names. Ergo, the name is not remotely bonkers.

Blimey!


The final result appears to now be a traditional bonfire night in Southwark Park and ?30,000 leftover for an event in Dulwich at a later date.


The Colour Thief... was going to be a fusion of Firework night, Diwali, Christmas and Hanukkah on Friday 4 November this year. Hence the unusual title. As this event would involve fireworks and planned to always take place around 5 November http://moderngov.southwarksites.com/mgConvert2PDF.aspx?ID=22438

Frankly I didn't get mixing all those events up with bonfire night.


Hi DJKillaQueen, I gave one example of the many problems major events have caused in Dulwich Park. The council could take the view they should ignore Friends of Dulwich Park but thankfully they didn't.

Pretty much every 'friends of' organisation opposes big events in their parks James.....if the council listened to all of them there would be no large events. Like I said, any budget always includes the cost of the the clean up afterwards and with good planning measures can be taken to prevent most problems.

I agree with you in general DJKillaQueen. Absolutely that's how events should be run. It's just that Southwark Council events team haven't successfully run big events in Dulwich Park and didn't allow enough funds to rectify all the damage caused under their management. And then took each time a year to repair the damage they caused.

Risking Dulwich Park for 2,000 people event lasting 1 hour versus a year before the park is repaired. It feels a no brainer to me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...