Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have mirrors on my bicycle handlebars and recommend them. You can hear emergency vehicles through headphones, just as you can hear emergency vehicles over a car or motorcycle engine or through a crash helmet. Sirens are designed to be louder than most noise.


At the end of the day it's up to the individual to do what makes them feel safest. Some people are more easily distracted than others just as some are more able to be focused on more things than others. Speaking from experince, I am more likely to have an accident on my cycle because a car driver isn't looking for me than as a result of wearing headphones.

As a cyclist, I have the view that the most steps I can personally take to reduce the risk of an accident is in MY interest for the simple reason that I will be the one most likely to suffer greater injury.


So its all very well for me to say "I wanna wear headphones, those car drivers are more far distracted than me blah blah". Wearing headphones whilst cycling, in my view, greatly inhibits my awareness of what's going on around me. No matter if other road users are either a) driving perfectly or b) driving like maniacs. If there's an accident, for whatever reason, I will come off worst.


I can understand why some road users despair of cyclists, and I can sympathise after reading some of the posts on here. Harry, you wonder why we don't smile and wave to other cyclists in London? :))

Like I said, it's different for different people. Headphones inhibit your awareness but they don't mine....it is not fair to call all cyclists who do use headphones 'stupid' and I can't see anything in this thread from anyone that would make a driver dispair of cyclists either.
Headphones inhibit your awareness but they don't mine


I have the same opinion on beer and yet Her Majesty's constabularly still insist on limiting me to a single pint of nut-brown ale before getting behind the wheel of my motor vehicle.


Ridiculous nanny-state moddycoddling.


Tell you what DJKQ - try cycling blindfolded. Makes the journey much more fun and you can rely on your other senses for guidance - like smell. You'll know you've hit a bus when you can smell the diesel fumes from the engine on your own face.

But not to an extent that it interefers with my ability to cycle safely...that's the point of the discussion. I can hear less from inside in a car without the radio on....so eyes and mirrors are everything, just as they are on a motorbike. Why would a cyclist be deemed to need more use of hearing than drivers? Deaf and hard of hearing people cycle, do they not? Are they stupid for even daring to get on a cycle?

Ah the Boris Johnson excuse - having been caught cycling whilst talking on a mobile he said that one-armed people are allowed to ride bikes.


And yours is as ridiculous. You are intentionally impairing your faculties rather than battling against a physical disability. To compare the two is distasteful.


You're being disingenuous here just for the sake of proving a point. Just admit you don't really care if you're unsafe and people will shrug their shoulders at your attitude. But to try and maintain a defence of reason and logic whilst all those around you (including cyclists) disagree and point out the glaring flaws is utterly absurd.

psml......you are just trying to provoke now. I'm not rising to it....


I've been cycling in London for 25 years....I've had three accidents. Two were the faults of drivers turning left and driving over me. One was the result of mechanical failure on my bicycle. I'd say I'm a very safe cyclist on that record...

Headphones obviously inhibit your awareness - the issue is whether they materially inhibit i.e. are you less safe as a result. In my view (and that of everybody else, probably in the world) they inevitably do. DJKQ, equally inevitably, disagrees. And thus the debate reaches the usual EDF conclusion.

zeban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> (slow) cyclists, please don't cycle right in front

> of buses, buses move slow enough as it is!


Sorry, zeban - not sure you're ever going to stop that one since there's no way you're going to get any cyclist to sit behind a bus in its fumes while it stops at bus stops. We'll overtake the bus and then it will either catch us up and pass us or it will sit behind us if the next bus stop isn't that far ahead. There are so many bus stops and passengers in rush hour that it's pretty unusual for a most cyclist to pass a bus and then have it overtake them again.


One exception to that though is when the bus catches up on a hill (like DKH) or going over the Thames (like Vauxhall where cyclists are encouraged to go via the bus station); then yes, most cyclists will slow down the bus slightly if it can't get out to overtake.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have mirrors on my bicycle handlebars and

> recommend them. You can hear emergency vehicles

> through headphones, just as you can hear emergency

> vehicles over a car or motorcycle engine or

> through a crash helmet. Sirens are designed to be

> louder than most noise.

>

> At the end of the day it's up to the individual to

> do what makes them feel safest. Some people are

> more easily distracted than others just as some

> are more able to be focused on more things than

> others. Speaking from experince, I am more likely

> to have an accident on my cycle because a car

> driver isn't looking for me than as a result of

> wearing headphones.




Yes, you can hear a siren aboveyour headphones- but without the headphones you can hear it sooner

Cyclist has to be aware of each other and pedestrians, I find this not always the case unfortunately Harry in London not all people are friendly there are some people in the morning that look like they have been smacked by a Baboon hello anyway Harry happy cycling.

Thomas Micklewright Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i always give other cyclists a nod.

>

> why are there so many people not wearing helmets

> cycling, perplexes me?


cos it gets in the way of their giant funky headphones that gives them super powers of invincibilty on the road. Next?

now there's a valid debate right there- does wearing a helmet really give a cyclist any more safety on the road?


i guess the only protection it offers is to a head that's going to hit the ground- how often does that happen in a cycling accident? ever?


for the record, i do wear one for my commute, bit often not for a short local ride.

although I agree and I dont put a helmet on for local 5 minute cycle rides; when I have cycled into town in the rush hour I have seen several cycling accidents and some of them involve the cyclist being thrown off their bike and their helmet inpacting the ground or a vehicle.

ps I dont wear headphones,

Only up to 12mph though. They offer little protection beyond that.


The two serious accidents where cyclists were knocked over by a bus and a lorry in London yesterday (Aldwych and Vauxhall respectively) incurred more injury to the cyclists legs and torso than a head.


(gah, I've entered a helmet thread!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our current councillors follow a rather opposite course, in my view. They certainly don't respect the views of their electorate. 
    • The planters would be lovely if only the plants had been maintained once they had been planted. I think it would have been better not to have had them at all than to just leave them with plants in very poor condition. Were whoever installed them hoping that  residents in the relevant streets would look after them? 
    • I spoke at the council meeting last night to object. 400 people objected to the development. I, and I suspect everyone else, is not against development, BUT the size of this too BIG to accept. The council is held hostage by the developer who is promising 53 affordable homes. And in return they get to build 360 bedrooms for students. The original plan was all student accommodation. 8 stories is completely out of sync. It’s sets a precedent for future development. They have been taking to the council since 2022.  What did not help our cause whatsoever was Counsellors McAsh and Mwangangye speaking as ward counsellors at the meeting. As the Chair of the committee said, it’s not often ward counsellors attend such meetings. The counsellors will say they didn’t speak for or against the development. However, they did speak up for the benefits of the site bringing more affordable housing to the borough. They asked for a window to have frosted glass to protect privacy. They asked for residents to be consulted during the building phase. So let’s be really clear, they did not say anything about the “optimisation” of the site. They did not ask for the site to be scaled down. Now I know why James would not be drawn into discussing the development before now….   Make no mistake, this development is optimised for profit and the trade off is the developer profits at scale and the council have 53 affordable homes. The Southwark Plan says they should respect the character of East Dulwich. How can an 8 story building be ever respectful to the character of East Dulwich. It’s a hugely imposing building.  Unless we stand up together as a community, then we shall be stuck with it, although I suspect we won’t be stuck with our Labour counsellors for much longer… Feeling let down and disappointed this morning.   
    • Another glowing review for Niko the plumber. I found his details on the forum after we had a water leak. He was able to come round same day and fixed our problem. He was very reasonable and did a great job.    His number is 07818 607583.   Matt 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...