Jump to content

Recommended Posts

15 or so pupils from Harris were gathered in the street near me on Friday afternoon for some sort of (apparently) pre-arranged fight between 2 of them. They proceeded to get into a fairly brutal fight in the middle of the road while the others cheered them from the side-lines. I am planning on reporting this to staff at Harris and was wondering whether anyone had any experience of contacting the school on something like this and could suggest who might be best to speak to (i.e. someone who might take it reasonably seriously). Thanks


Update - I thought I would post something by way of update to say that the School did indeed take this seriously and not only responded very quickly to my contacting them, but dealt with the matter in a timely and efficient manner. The HT and safer schools liaison also helpfully explained to me what they had/were doing to address the issue with the individuals concerned). I thought it only fair to mention this by way of update, so that any parents of children at the school can be assured that it was dealt with effectively and in a very professional manner.

Sounds like you did all the right things. The reason I asked the question is, would the police not automatically contact the school?



dulwichbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, of course I did. By the time the van and car

> load of police arrived they had moved on - the

> Police went off looking for them (but I suspect

> not for long, as it was a busy time of day).

bodsier Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What would the consequences be for under 18s

> fighting? Would they get a criminal record?


They would likely, at worst, for fighting without knives, get a youth rehabilitation order, which is regarded as "spent" six months after the end of the order. And unless anyone was seriously hurt they're most likely to get a youth caution, which is "spent" as soon as issued.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this just your classic school scrap then with

> everybody clustering round to watch (and once

> someone goes down it's over) or is it worse.


Yes - initially looked a bit heavy handed to get the police involved, to me. But then with knife crime so prevalent, best to do so.


Assuming it was just a fight, suggestions of a criminal record are laughable.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes - initially looked a bit heavy handed to get

> the police involved, to me. But then with knife

> crime so prevalent, best to do so.

>

> Assuming it was just a fight, suggestions of a

> criminal record are laughable.


The Police were only called because one boy was knocked over twice by punches in the space of about a minute, the second time hitting his head (loudly) on the kerb. It wasn't stopping, so I was concerned someone might get properly injured if it carried on.


As for criminal convictions/records, I never raised that as a possibility (and I don't think it is). I would have thought it is now a School matter (together with the Safer Schools PC liaison). Now it's over, what I am hoping is that those concerned are discouraged from having serious punch-ups in my street. While some might like to describe it (almost sentimentally) as "just your classic school scrap", my young children don't need to be frightened by seeing violence like that on their doorstep, nor do they need to witness 15 (to them, very big) kids shouting, swearing and being aggressive towards each other. Indeed, several passing school kids (who were not involved) looked positively terrified by it.


So, no, it was a rather nasty fight and very unpleasant to see, but nothing like as serious as a street robbery or GBH.

"Just a fight" at a school I briefly taught at resulted in one boy hitting his head on a wall after being punched, ending up in a long coma with permanent cognitive damage, and with his assailant going into youth custody. So my advice would be, if you don't feel qualified to break it up yourself (and in most cases, especially nowadays, it's probably inadvisable), do call the police, you might stop several lives being ruined. Pre-arranged fights outside school aren't the same as schoolyard larks and scraps, they're a serious business and need to be taken seriously by the public, the police and, if needs be, the courts. If nothing else, if kids don't learn this is a serious business now, they'll carry this behaviour into adulthood, only with higher stakes and heavier weapons.


Sorry, pompous I know but I do feel quite strongly it shouldn't be seen as "just kids" - I've seen firsthand how this stuff can quickly escalate into very serious shit indeed.

dulwichbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes - initially looked a bit heavy handed to

> get

> > the police involved, to me. But then with knife

> > crime so prevalent, best to do so.

> >

> > Assuming it was just a fight, suggestions of a

> > criminal record are laughable.

>

> The Police were only called because one boy was

> knocked over twice by punches in the space of

> about a minute, the second time hitting his head

> (loudly) on the kerb. It wasn't stopping, so I was

> concerned someone might get properly injured if it

> carried on.

>

> As for criminal convictions/records, I never

> raised that as a possibility (and I don't think it

> is). I would have thought it is now a School

> matter (together with the Safer Schools PC

> liaison). Now it's over, what I am hoping is that

> those concerned are discouraged from having

> serious punch-ups in my street. While some might

> like to describe it (almost sentimentally) as

> "just your classic school scrap", my young

> children don't need to be frightened by seeing

> violence like that on their doorstep, nor do they

> need to witness 15 (to them, very big) kids

> shouting, swearing and being aggressive towards

> each other. Indeed, several passing school kids

> (who were not involved) looked positively

> terrified by it.

>

> So, no, it was a rather nasty fight and very

> unpleasant to see, but nothing like as serious as

> a street robbery or GBH.


School scraps stopped when one went down in my memory (and others would stop it if it didn't) - and they were normally at the back of a school field (so softer landing)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Just a fight" at a school I briefly taught at

> resulted in one boy hitting his head on a wall

> after being punched, ending up in a long coma with

> permanent cognitive damage, and with his assailant

> going into youth custody. So my advice would be,

> if you don't feel qualified to break it up

> yourself (and in most cases, especially nowadays,

> it's probably inadvisable), do call the police,

> you might stop several lives being ruined.

> Pre-arranged fights outside school aren't the same

> as schoolyard larks and scraps, they're a serious

> business and need to be taken seriously by the

> public, the police and, if needs be, the courts.

> If nothing else, if kids don't learn this is a

> serious business now, they'll carry this behaviour

> into adulthood, only with higher stakes and

> heavier weapons.

>

> Sorry, pompous I know but I do feel quite strongly

> it shouldn't be seen as "just kids" - I've seen

> firsthand how this stuff can quickly escalate into

> very serious shit indeed.





That's why I asked the question Mic mac, and didn't assume anything........the OP Described it as 'brutal' not at all laughable is it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...