Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well....I think the panel seem to be a lot better.....and liking Gary Barlow very much (he is way too good looking). They seem to be only putting through people who can on the whole sing though (which makes a change).


Will be interesting to see what they are like at the mentoring stage. I think Kelly Rowland is going to be really good. She'll make them work hard.

Nice post Nette; you nailed it, you made it your own, that's what this forum is all about, you owned the thread, when I first saw the thread title I thought oh-oh... but then you really delivered, and people wonder if this forum has any validity in the modern world - well I'd just tell them to read that post, you had this whole forum on its feet, I've read threads like this a million times but that was really something special, I'm looking forward to seeing more posts in the coming weeks - you're going through to Lond -oops!

That about sums up how I feel maxxi though I don't watch the show. Nette is a class act. Did I ever tell you someone once said they thought I was like Louis. I was somewhat confused until it was explained to me it wasn't Jungle Book Louis. LOL


Huh.....just checked up on what I'd written. Better avoid that in future.



lol It's original definition was "Laughing out loud" (also written occasionally as "Lots of Laughs"), used as a brief acronym to denote great amusement in chat conversations.


Now, it is overused to the point where nobody laughs out loud when they say it. In fact, they probably don't even give a shit about what you just wrote. More accurately, the acronym "lol" should be redefined as "Lack of laughter."


Depending on the chatter, its definition may vary. The list of its meanings includes, but is not limited to:

1) "I have nothing worthwhile to contribute to this conversation."

2) "I'm too lazy to read what you just wrote so I'm typing something useless in hopes that you'll think I'm still paying attention."

3) "Your statement lacks even the vaguest trace of humor but I'll pretend I'm amused."

4) "This is a pointless acronym I'm sticking in my sentence just because it's become so engraved into my mind that when chatting, I MUST use the meaningless sentence-filler 'lol.'"

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice post Nette; you nailed it, you made it your

> own, that's what this forum is all about, you

> owned the thread, when I first saw the thread

> title I thought oh-oh... but then you really

> delivered, and people wonder if this forum has any

> validity in the modern world - well I'd just tell

> them to read that post, you had this whole forum

> on its feet, I've read threads like this a million

> times but that was really something special, I'm

> looking forward to seeing more posts in the coming

> weeks - you're going through to Lond -oops!



I know, i'm brilliant.


But sorry to say ( as you're somewhat behind the curve ) I can't take you through to the next round.


So it's back to your day job fitting tyres and shock absorbers at Kwik-Fit.


Nette(tu)



p.s. I know you're watching really & if moos digs the show/thread, then the world is okay with me .

Dear northlondoner, if you're going to post snobbish comments about vulgar telly you really ought to spell paean correctly. Of course it's garish, hypocritical, sentimental, manipulative, totally fixed crap! That's its charm. If you eat a kebab, you can't complain it's not a fillet steak.


Love

Moos (oik)

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear northlondoner, if you're going to post

> snobbish comments about vulgar telly you really

> ought to spell paean correctly. Of course it's

> garish, hypocritical, sentimental, manipulative,

> totally fixed crap! That's its charm. If you eat


> a kebab, you can't complain it's not a fillet

> steak.



Ouch! Good point M. Back of the class for me. *slopes off shame faced*


>

> Love

> Moos (oik)

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't even know what paean means...! I am fik!



Not at all, here is the dictionary definition...


1. An unpleasant sensation occurring in varying degrees of severity to a geordie as a consequence of injury, disease, or emotional disorder.

2. Suffering or distress of a geordie.

3. paeans The pangs of geordie childbirth.

4. paeans Great care or effort on behalf of geordie: take paeans with one's work.

5. Informal A source of annoyance; a nuisance.

v. paeaned, paean?ing, paeans

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I know, i'm brilliant.

>

> But sorry to say ( as you're somewhat behind the

> curve ) I can't take you through to the next

> round.

>

> So it's back to your day job fitting tyres and

> shock absorbers at Kwik-Fit.

>

> Nette(tu)



Too late - turns out you CAN get better...



http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKT3b3tgzdJGCX5TE2TrPWHejjIbHE4DcW670RFvv4TGMIlTflnA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...