Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I?ve just spoken to my neighbour, a woman in her eighties who lives on her own in Kirkdale. A gardening company had put a business card through her letterbox, so she called them and asked them to visit and quote to trim a tree in her garden. 2 guys arrived and told her that the tree needed to be cut down (which it didn?t) and refused to tell her how much it would cost. Despite her protestations, they became aggressive and cut a few branches off the tree then asked her for ?2100. She was terrified - they made her go to the bank and withdraw the cash and give it to them. Now we all can see that there were opportunities for her to call the police, but she was too afraid and just wanted them to go. Obviously she called the police once they had gone, but they are not confident that there will be much they can do.

So be warned. Ignore business cards that come through your letterbox. And watch out for these scumbag thieves.....

Taking money out of a bank with menaces is the same as robbery (effectively once I was forced to give my pin up once - the police can't do anything but the bank can). It's a crime and the bank WILL reimburse surely.


Edit: What I mean is there was no way she authorised the transaction - she let it happen because they were with her threatening her.

Please alert the bank to what looks like a failure in their procedures: most (all?) now say they are aware of these issues and check carefully before authorising the withdrawal of large amounts of cash by older customers, checking with relatives etc if suspicious. Hope the lady's recovering from such an unpleasant experience and that they catch these [redacted] soon.
  • 2 weeks later...

Dis, are you able to give us the name or phone number on the flyer? My mum is looking for someone to do some work on the tree in her garden and recently had a (very genuine looking) flyer through the door from someone claiming to be a tree surgeon. I don't want her to suffer the same horrible treatment as your neighbour.


Also I found this news story which doesn't encourage me but at least these ones were caught.

http://www.bromley.gov.uk/press/article/1252/rogue_traders_sentenced_following_gardening_and_tree_work


Thanks

David

Gosh how dreadful. There were some blokes hanging out in a van outside my house a while back - seemed dodgy so I went out to ask them if they needed some help. They said they were tree surgeons and as it happened we needed a tree taking out so i asked for a price and he gave a price I was ok with. Then he pressed me to get the cash out on the spot, i said no it wasn't a good time but could do the next week. Then he refused to give me his number and said he'd put a card through the door which he never did... I thought it was odd at the time as I'd have been happy to pay, and had them down for fraudsters. Wonder if it's the same chaps.

Ive replied via private message, because it may be possible that these cowboys are printing flyers that use a legitimate company's name, but they are changing the phone numbers for their own. This way, if you go to the website you see a perfectly good company, who may be professional and completely honest.. But of you call the mobile number you get through to a scumbag who has nothing to do with the real company.

I don't want to publicly accuse a company of malpractice, because it may actually have nothing to do with them.

What i will say is that the mobile number on the flyer ended with 8864..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...