Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A branch of Greggs the baker is to open in one of the vacant units in Dulwich Village I?m reliably informed. It wil be opposite Gail?s next to the new butchers or in the old Audi showroom. I?d be interested to know how some of the more well to do DV residents feel about a cheap Northern bakers opening up in the Village.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/194992-greggs-in-dulwich-village/
Share on other sites

I stopped going to Gail's after I formally requested that they covered the food on the central table as there are often flies crawling on the cakes and sandwiches.


Head office said they took my health concerns seriously.


Last time I went in to Gail's in Dulwich Village and Wimbledon there was no coverings and nothing had changed.


So, I will be happy to exchange my spinach and taleggio quiche for a Greggs sausage roll any day.


It's all about respecting your customers, folks!

PaulDV Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A branch of Greggs the baker is to open in one of

> the vacant units in Dulwich Village I?m reliably

> informed. It wil be opposite Gail?s next to the

> new butchers or in the old Audi showroom. I?d be

> interested to know how some of the more well to do

> DV residents feel about a cheap Northern bakers

> opening up in the Village.

bring it on!!!

Jacqui5254 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I stopped going to Gail's after I formally

> requested that they covered the food on the

> central table as there are often flies crawling on

> the cakes and sandwiches.

>

> Head office said they took my health concerns

> seriously.

>

> Last time I went in to Gail's in Dulwich Village

> and Wimbledon there was no coverings and nothing

> had changed.

>

> So, I will be happy to exchange my spinach and

> taleggio quiche for a Greggs sausage roll any day.

>

>

> It's all about respecting your customers, folks!



More than that, it?s a major EHO violation. You can get in serious trouble for that, I?m astonished they don?t cover them.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kings dream Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > rather snobish attitude to have

>

> If that was aimed at me, I was actually eating

> Frosties at the time...


Ordinary Cornflakes not good enough for you then!...

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it sends local snobs into fits of apoplexy at

> the sale of Tottenham slices then so much the better!


I'd never actually heard of Tottenham slices / Tottenham cake before. But it looks good... like something I need to eat.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Ordinary Cornflakes not good enough for you

> then!...


Too soggy! Also not sweet enough. Waitrose doesn't seem to sell them: how middle class is that?


PS - now having late lunch of Jamie Oliver Morroccan grains (Sainsbury's special offer) with baby leaf salad (Morrisons), avocado and soy sauce ( both Lidl). What class am I now?

Definitely but gluten doesn?t like me anymore but I still give in to the lure of bread now and again!



camberwell70 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Love the London cheesecake from Greggs.

>

> Dulwich born and bread?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...