Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I presume you're referring to the Guardian article at the weekend? Jon Moulton has a point although I think it could take some time to play out.


Mizuho and Bank of America provided 100% of the debt for BC Partners' acquisition in the expectation that they would be able to bring other banks in (i.e. syndicate) later to share the exposure. However, from news articles in August, it looks like they are struggling to interest other banks due to a combination of (a) the general turbulence in the markets (b) this deal looks particularly highly-leveraged and © the return on the loan now looks inadequate. The banks can attempt to fix © by offering some more money to prospective partner banks but only up to a certain point.


BC Partners probably has a few options - not least of which is to ignore it since it's legally the banks' problem.


However, coming back to Moulton's arguments, Foxtons is unlikely to come a cropper unless it trips a banking covenant. Under its current debt structure, it will not have to repay any of its debt for at least 7 years. It should be relatively protected from higher interest rates. It is also likely that its covenant package is pretty weak. All of this means that even if Foxtons doesn't perform as expected, which I would have thought is quite likely, it is likely to have a grace period before it gets serious.


Of course, if they've really stuffed up their business plans or documentation then it could come tumbling down much quicker e.g. the acquisition of Esporta gyms took only 6 months to go tits up!



 

Yes, so far as I can tell at the moment and without any inside information. However, it would not be unusual for interest cover to be tight at the start of a deal, increasing as growth provides additional cashflows. If this growth doesn't appear ...


Also, Mizuho and Bank of America might also be pushing for some more lender-friendly terms to enable them to sell down their debt (even though they might not have the legal right to get these terms from BC Partners). This could lead to the deal structure changing.


Finally, Foxtons is a relatively small deal compared to some that are in a similar position e.g. Boots, AA, Intelsat (where BC Partners paid $5bn for a majority stake).

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Financial journalists seem to have settled on ?290m for the price BC Partners paid for the 20 branches of Foxtons. At an average price of ?14.5m per branch commentators are saying that BC Partners overpaid and the Foxtons business model is now likely to collapse given the costs of re-financing the loans used to purchase Foxtons and the slump in the housing market.


Has anyone seen any glum faces in East Dulwich Foxtons recently?

Oooh mikeb, a man in the know. Where should I invest the hundred or so pounds I am gonna save by not being fleeced for buying ridiculously expensive bread (see other topic!)


I am walking past Foxtons later, I shall look in and smile at the staff and get a free cuppa out of them maybe as I pretend to be interested in ?300,000 ex council flats....!

I've seen ?390m as well, from Reuters. Total acquisition debt package was ?260m


According to the Telegraph today, Countrywide estate agents (Bairstow Eve, John D Wood, Mann Group) seems to be having some difficulties. Its financing structure is broadly similar to Foxtons, although probably has even fewer restrictions. So if the article is right, this could suggest that Foxtons could also be facing problems sooner rather than later.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Did anyone read the article about Foxtons and its founder in the FT this weekend? It pretty much explains the whole situation with the company at the minute, and also the hefty sum which jon hunt (founder) made upon selling the company last year to BC partners. Even though foxtons financial situation is other than stable, i very much doubt they will be closing down soon - despite them arriving in ED during uncertain economic times, they are very well established and are leaders in their market although only operating in London and the South West.

Good article in the FT Weekend - made interesting reading. I think one fact sums it up - that Foxtons annual interest payments on the BC partners loans are more than their 2006 profit (which was a good year). And they only have 8 years to pay it back. In a falling market. And they have no real assets other than the odd freehold, commercial leases on their 21 hideous branches. And 79 green mini coopers. Their founders sell out last summer was so perfectly timed, it makes me feel queasy.


B**%%&!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...