Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I presume you're referring to the Guardian article at the weekend? Jon Moulton has a point although I think it could take some time to play out.


Mizuho and Bank of America provided 100% of the debt for BC Partners' acquisition in the expectation that they would be able to bring other banks in (i.e. syndicate) later to share the exposure. However, from news articles in August, it looks like they are struggling to interest other banks due to a combination of (a) the general turbulence in the markets (b) this deal looks particularly highly-leveraged and © the return on the loan now looks inadequate. The banks can attempt to fix © by offering some more money to prospective partner banks but only up to a certain point.


BC Partners probably has a few options - not least of which is to ignore it since it's legally the banks' problem.


However, coming back to Moulton's arguments, Foxtons is unlikely to come a cropper unless it trips a banking covenant. Under its current debt structure, it will not have to repay any of its debt for at least 7 years. It should be relatively protected from higher interest rates. It is also likely that its covenant package is pretty weak. All of this means that even if Foxtons doesn't perform as expected, which I would have thought is quite likely, it is likely to have a grace period before it gets serious.


Of course, if they've really stuffed up their business plans or documentation then it could come tumbling down much quicker e.g. the acquisition of Esporta gyms took only 6 months to go tits up!



 

Yes, so far as I can tell at the moment and without any inside information. However, it would not be unusual for interest cover to be tight at the start of a deal, increasing as growth provides additional cashflows. If this growth doesn't appear ...


Also, Mizuho and Bank of America might also be pushing for some more lender-friendly terms to enable them to sell down their debt (even though they might not have the legal right to get these terms from BC Partners). This could lead to the deal structure changing.


Finally, Foxtons is a relatively small deal compared to some that are in a similar position e.g. Boots, AA, Intelsat (where BC Partners paid $5bn for a majority stake).

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Financial journalists seem to have settled on ?290m for the price BC Partners paid for the 20 branches of Foxtons. At an average price of ?14.5m per branch commentators are saying that BC Partners overpaid and the Foxtons business model is now likely to collapse given the costs of re-financing the loans used to purchase Foxtons and the slump in the housing market.


Has anyone seen any glum faces in East Dulwich Foxtons recently?

Oooh mikeb, a man in the know. Where should I invest the hundred or so pounds I am gonna save by not being fleeced for buying ridiculously expensive bread (see other topic!)


I am walking past Foxtons later, I shall look in and smile at the staff and get a free cuppa out of them maybe as I pretend to be interested in ?300,000 ex council flats....!

I've seen ?390m as well, from Reuters. Total acquisition debt package was ?260m


According to the Telegraph today, Countrywide estate agents (Bairstow Eve, John D Wood, Mann Group) seems to be having some difficulties. Its financing structure is broadly similar to Foxtons, although probably has even fewer restrictions. So if the article is right, this could suggest that Foxtons could also be facing problems sooner rather than later.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Did anyone read the article about Foxtons and its founder in the FT this weekend? It pretty much explains the whole situation with the company at the minute, and also the hefty sum which jon hunt (founder) made upon selling the company last year to BC partners. Even though foxtons financial situation is other than stable, i very much doubt they will be closing down soon - despite them arriving in ED during uncertain economic times, they are very well established and are leaders in their market although only operating in London and the South West.

Good article in the FT Weekend - made interesting reading. I think one fact sums it up - that Foxtons annual interest payments on the BC partners loans are more than their 2006 profit (which was a good year). And they only have 8 years to pay it back. In a falling market. And they have no real assets other than the odd freehold, commercial leases on their 21 hideous branches. And 79 green mini coopers. Their founders sell out last summer was so perfectly timed, it makes me feel queasy.


B**%%&!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agree with @Sue the Dog is awful-nice building awful food. We like The Rossendale and Watsons
    • There are so many variables. Good chefs can having bad nights, post-Brexit staff shortages, your dish might be brilliant, your friend might order something that's inedible. In the end I think the best option is just to go to the restaurant which has the best overall reviews. If all the reviews are bad then avoid, but even if all the reviews are good that's not a cast iron gaurantee. 
    • The trouble is that pub management and chefs are constantly changing, so what might be fantastic on one occasion  becomes terrible a short time later, and vice versa. Two of the worst pub lunches I've had locally were at the Dog in the village and the Plough, but both those were some time ago. We had an absolutely appalling Christmas lunch on Christmas Day at The Cherry Tree, which was also exorbitantly expensive, so unless their chef (I use the term loosely) has changed, I wouldn't advise eating there. The menu looked amazing. We thought we would treat ourselves. Never again 😭
    • If you've seen the original longer post then you'll know that you've taken that out of context. I don't charge but didn't feel I even needed to say that – you've made it sound like I do charge and that's why I deleted this part of the post saying I don't charge. When I read back what I'd written it sounded like I was defending myself against criticisms that hadn't even been made so i cut it out. And now you've made that kind of criticism anyway I should've left it in.  What do you mean "not charging people to read your reviews of their local restaurants."?  You make it sound like i'm sneaking into SE22 from somewhere else. I live here - they are reviews of my local restaurants!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...