Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think e-dealer that perhaps abuse was resorted to out of sheer amazement at you taking pics of a "no dogs" sign and a lab trotting about, seemingly doing no harm whatsoever.


I entirely agree that dogs should not be allowed to damage that area in any way; the planting is really beautiful and well done, and so it makes sense to have the sign there. But lets not go overboard - the dogs weren't harming any of the displays were they?


Also, the chap that you pulled up for having his dog on his lead, am I right in thinking that he was walking his dog, on a very dog-friendly, dog-centric day, on a path, next to a flowerbed with a no dogs sign, and you thought it necessary to give him a lecture?

No ON a flower bed with a no dog sign. Pictures supplied as some doubted the sign existed. And I didn't lecture anyone. Just pointed out that there was a sign saying no dogs. And he left the bed so all in all a happy encounter with a dog owner.
I am a dog owner and regularly walk my dog in peckham rye park. There are areas that simply say dogs must remain on a lead. The oval garden refered to hear is out of bounds for humans as well otherwise thare would not be a fence. Some people have no respect, its that simple. Dogs can't read and its owners resposibility to manage their own dog.

I was there too on Sat opp. the garden and the group with my dogs letting them into the pond to get cool. Them having been pulled away from sausages/floating dalmations/getting told off for knocking over beer/not winning prizes/in and out of dog-ring in 25 degree heat and not allowed to eat their and others' goodies.


Aforementioned group had a really over-friendly dog who kept knicking our ball, and humping my little dog. But hey! They're dogs. When the sun is out, let play commence!! No-one was hurt. After a while, 2 more black labs came to join in. Loads of fun and laughter. Not sure when anti-dog 'investigative' photographer turned up. Thankfully, we'd gone.

mrfish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Some people have no respect, its that simple. Dogs

> can't read and its owners resposibility to manage

> their own dog.



mine can..


http://www.teacupoflove.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dog_Reading.jpg

So there we have it. Just proves that some dog owners are in that elite group who think that rules and laws dont apply to them.Just to everyone else. Like Looting Rioters, Speeding Offenders and Drink Drivers. I guess we have to get used to the elite!

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So there we have it. Just proves that some dog

> owners are in that elite group who think that

> rules and laws dont apply to them.Just to everyone

> else. Like Looting Rioters, Speeding Offenders

> and Drink Drivers. I guess we have to get used to

> the elite!


Looting Rioters, Speeding Offenders and Drink Drivers injure people and can cause death...Joey the Jack Russell running about and trampling on the dandelions does not..

Er I think some Dogs do cause death. Like Rioters and Drinkers and Speeders they often don't cause death. But thats not why the the Rules / Lawa are there. A lot of Money was spent on tidying up the Park and we should just respect the parts that are 'protected' by signs

Ok what about people who illegally park , Pee in the Street, Blow their horns at 4 am. All antisocial all breaking rules and NOT killing anyone. Not paying fares on trains no TV license? are they ok 'just having a bit of fun'? exempt' Which rules/ laws is it ok to break? I'd just like the Dog owners who think it IS ok to break laws to tell me which ones it is ok to break.

I used to Like to Smoke with my Pint in the Pub - Can I do that? (Should I restart smoking!)

Id like to say Funnily enough - but I wont its not fully just found this - Dogs DO attack kids in Parks

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263932/Girl-4-attacked-police-dog-plays-park.html

But I don't believe in banning dogs. But I'd like dog owners to show some respect for the park and other people by sticking to the rules - its not that hard is it?

Maybe the Dog License should be brought back so there was some sort of sanction of anti social dog owners.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...