Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think e-dealer that perhaps abuse was resorted to out of sheer amazement at you taking pics of a "no dogs" sign and a lab trotting about, seemingly doing no harm whatsoever.


I entirely agree that dogs should not be allowed to damage that area in any way; the planting is really beautiful and well done, and so it makes sense to have the sign there. But lets not go overboard - the dogs weren't harming any of the displays were they?


Also, the chap that you pulled up for having his dog on his lead, am I right in thinking that he was walking his dog, on a very dog-friendly, dog-centric day, on a path, next to a flowerbed with a no dogs sign, and you thought it necessary to give him a lecture?

No ON a flower bed with a no dog sign. Pictures supplied as some doubted the sign existed. And I didn't lecture anyone. Just pointed out that there was a sign saying no dogs. And he left the bed so all in all a happy encounter with a dog owner.
I am a dog owner and regularly walk my dog in peckham rye park. There are areas that simply say dogs must remain on a lead. The oval garden refered to hear is out of bounds for humans as well otherwise thare would not be a fence. Some people have no respect, its that simple. Dogs can't read and its owners resposibility to manage their own dog.

I was there too on Sat opp. the garden and the group with my dogs letting them into the pond to get cool. Them having been pulled away from sausages/floating dalmations/getting told off for knocking over beer/not winning prizes/in and out of dog-ring in 25 degree heat and not allowed to eat their and others' goodies.


Aforementioned group had a really over-friendly dog who kept knicking our ball, and humping my little dog. But hey! They're dogs. When the sun is out, let play commence!! No-one was hurt. After a while, 2 more black labs came to join in. Loads of fun and laughter. Not sure when anti-dog 'investigative' photographer turned up. Thankfully, we'd gone.

mrfish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Some people have no respect, its that simple. Dogs

> can't read and its owners resposibility to manage

> their own dog.



mine can..


http://www.teacupoflove.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dog_Reading.jpg

So there we have it. Just proves that some dog owners are in that elite group who think that rules and laws dont apply to them.Just to everyone else. Like Looting Rioters, Speeding Offenders and Drink Drivers. I guess we have to get used to the elite!

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So there we have it. Just proves that some dog

> owners are in that elite group who think that

> rules and laws dont apply to them.Just to everyone

> else. Like Looting Rioters, Speeding Offenders

> and Drink Drivers. I guess we have to get used to

> the elite!


Looting Rioters, Speeding Offenders and Drink Drivers injure people and can cause death...Joey the Jack Russell running about and trampling on the dandelions does not..

Er I think some Dogs do cause death. Like Rioters and Drinkers and Speeders they often don't cause death. But thats not why the the Rules / Lawa are there. A lot of Money was spent on tidying up the Park and we should just respect the parts that are 'protected' by signs

Ok what about people who illegally park , Pee in the Street, Blow their horns at 4 am. All antisocial all breaking rules and NOT killing anyone. Not paying fares on trains no TV license? are they ok 'just having a bit of fun'? exempt' Which rules/ laws is it ok to break? I'd just like the Dog owners who think it IS ok to break laws to tell me which ones it is ok to break.

I used to Like to Smoke with my Pint in the Pub - Can I do that? (Should I restart smoking!)

Id like to say Funnily enough - but I wont its not fully just found this - Dogs DO attack kids in Parks

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263932/Girl-4-attacked-police-dog-plays-park.html

But I don't believe in banning dogs. But I'd like dog owners to show some respect for the park and other people by sticking to the rules - its not that hard is it?

Maybe the Dog License should be brought back so there was some sort of sanction of anti social dog owners.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It took the Tories 14 years to dig that 20bn blackhole. It's taken Labour 14 months to double it.  You cant get rid of Reeves though because the next person will actually be totally incompetent. There are no MPs in Labour capable of performing better than the current shower.
    • Thanks P. That sounds like a bargain compared to other horror stories I've heard! 
    • DD, "Rejoice rejoice. It's a pity he and his fellow clowns were completely annihilated at the ballot box. I mean they were doing so well after all 🙃🙃" At least the economy and unemployment weren't in the mess they are now. What is it, give the public sector a whopping pay increase with no strings attached, double the black hole and then blame it on the last Govt. Give me strength. Rachel from accounts shouldn't be anywhere near the economy. The final straw was increasing employer NI contributions and look how that's worked out. Month on month both inflation and unemployment have risen. Won't be long before inflation and u/e are exceeding 5%, but guess what, They'll blame Sunak and go.  Lets have a snap election right NOW, then see how poorly Starmer, Reeves and Rainer do. They're already plotting to get rid of Starmer, and if you think its bad now, you ain't seen nothing yet. Oh and did I mention Starmer wanting to stop Freedom of Speech............................................Normal people can see right through what him and co are doing, great at spending other peoples money, him and co don't have = bankruptcy. We'll just repeat the economic collapse that happened in Greece and wasn't it in Italy as well?
    • One of the best of Shakespeare 's plays.  I did Othello for A level. Also seen a number of stage and film versions. Is there any specific aspects of the play that is difficult for your daughter to understand?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...