Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha ha, nah - that's too simple. :))

>

> The first thing boils down to 'have I got what I

> want'?

> The second thing boils down to 'has he got what I

> want'?



Lol

Mine would be: you're successful if you're doing what you enjoy, are truly happy and following your own "truth".

The number of those who claim what success is/means to them but whom are doing everything but those things to avoid getting there is staggering. The "I could have been a contender"...stuck in bad relationships, crap jobs, fear holding them back from doing what they really want. Whilst time ticks away and life is short. That is surely the real tragedy?

Success is sometimes what people achieve through fear of failure. This keeps them motivated. Its not necessarily what they really wanted from life, but a career cycle swallows them up.


I have always been envious of those who choose their own path and are happy with their vocation, irrespective of whether they are promoted or well paid. These people appear to have the level of success that they want.


Successful people are sometimes the most insecure of people, spending their lives playing the game and batting away any competition.


As someone already pointed out, the most "successful" people often pursue success to the detroment of their personal relationships. These people are generally selfish and put their personal career achievements above everything else.

But Mick, you're talking of success as equating to purely accumulation of wealth or career positioning again and as you also say, its surely much more than that?


Some successful people in that stereotype (ie success=career success or financial reward) have crap relationships but I'll wager its no more than the "unsuccessfull" or those frustated that they never fulfilled their true potential.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry to be dim. How are the Greens "peddling sectarianism"? I have googled a definition and I can see how this might apply to Reform 🤬 but I can't see how it applies to the Greens?
    • There  is a dance fit class at Harris girls on a Monday evening 630 pm which I have been going to for years . It is an inclusive class  with a wide range of ages.    The  teacher is Fi and she is amazing and  the classes are lots of fun.   look on the web justdanceuk .com. There are other dance classes  (flowetic )that Fi and the lovely Lizzie runs  at Harris girls too . They also have an event next week which is a bit further- near Penge  which is a day of dance to include  just dance fit, dancehall, line dancing, garage fit and flowetic . Which is also available to book on that website  ( look at the events section) .  
    • that’s just been misused first by Faraz and then Starmer. It’s evocative and negative.  But it’s flooding the news today.
    • I didn't realise that either! I thought it just meant division within communities - religious, racial or otherwise.  Yes, it is frightening. The days of the broad church political party are over. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...