Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This has always been the MO of the far right. They want class war, street brawls, anarchy. For a brief spell, Tommy Robinson deluded himself he could get elected to the EU Parliament, and then played the victim when it didn't happen. And all of them, from him to Hatey Hopkins, are now being funded by alt and far right American Islamaphobic organisations and lauded by the likes of nutjobs like Alex Jones and Ezra Levant, who wouldn't know honest journalism if it hit them in the face. Tommy has that defamation case to look forward to when he gets out as well. Costly business being a rabble rousing liar.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "his cause"....all he has done is highlight the

> activities of certain muslims


Yes but specifically focusing on Islam is problematic. I would be the first to admit that Islam has more than it's fair share of problems right now (and I am not a fan of religion at the best of times). BUT acting as though it is the only problem this country faces is highly disingenuous, and undoubtedly borne from prejudice. For instance, surely you can think of other institutions which have covered up, or failed to investigate child abuse in recent times? Or terrorist acts committed in the name of other ideologies or religions? I am not attempting to mount some sort of straw-man defence of radical Islam, but I am saying that some perspective is required.


As for the hooligan-inspired pseudonym - I am not sure why you bothered mentioning that. Tommy Robinson is still not his name. It just goes to show what an unpleasant character he really is.

After the authorities closed ranks and protected the vile Jimmy Saville then ALL the public 'protectors' should be following up abuse especially after this little gem

https://www.politicalite.com/corbyn/labour/labours-cover-up-gordon-browns-government-urged-police-not-to-investigate-muslim-grooming-gangs/

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> After the authorities closed ranks and protected

> the vile Jimmy Saville then ALL the public

> 'protectors' should be following up abuse

> especially after this little gem

> https://www.politicalite.com/corbyn/labour/labours

> -cover-up-gordon-browns-government-urged-police-no

> t-to-investigate-muslim-grooming-gangs/


you really don't know what you're talking about

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> After the authorities closed ranks and protected

> the vile Jimmy Saville then ALL the public

> 'protectors' should be following up abuse

> especially after this little gem

> https://www.politicalite.com/corbyn/labour/labours

> -cover-up-gordon-browns-government-urged-police-no

> t-to-investigate-muslim-grooming-gangs/


Out of all these sites many of which I don't like some left wing (Cnary) some right wing (Guido). Only one gets a red and UncG picks it :).


Newsguard rankings for UK newsbrands (so far):

BBC News: Green

Sky News: Green

ITV News: Green

LBC: Green

The Times: Green

The Sun: Green

Mail Online: Green

The Telegraph: Green

Financial Times: Green

The Guardian: Green

The Independent: Green

Buzzfeed News UK: Green

Huffpost UK: Green

Daily Express: Green

The i: Green

Daily Star: Green

Daily Mirror: Green

Metro: Green

Evening Standard: Green

Manchester Evening News: Green

The Canary: Green

Guido Fawkes: Green

The Economist: Green

New Statesman: Green

Spectator: Green

Politicalite UK: Red


https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/us-start-up-newsguard-rolls-out-rankings-for-major-uk-newsbrands/

Saw the gaggle of "Oh Tommy Robinson" followers. Disappointed as I thought it was the left wing gay activist, pop star and Six music activist Tom Robinson. I was hoping to have a rendition of Power in the Darkness, stand up and fight for your rights. (Or even some Beastie Boys).


I had a chat with the riot police that I found their attitude rather racist and not representative of our tolerant liberal society but the riot police didn't seem to understand (and I expect some may sympathize with Mr Y-L). Although I find it quite ironic that the extreme right then turn on the police - who they should really side with as they want a fascist state.


Not seeing any anti-fascist protestors I didn't really want to have a pop on myself, particularly as I had my work tablet in my hand. Thet would be great arriving at the meeting late to apologise as I'd had a brawl with some Nazis. Oh and sorry for the damage to my tablet IT department. One for the CV though!


So no battle of Cable Street I'm afraid

Apparently the battle of Cable Street was not a historic alignment between the left wing and Jews, as official representatives of both sides refused to support this.. This is all an urban myth as Europe turned towards communism after the war. https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/the-battle-of-cable-street-and-other-british-jewish-myths-1.5446805 However 20000 ordinary people, many East End Jews and many left wing, opposing the British Union of Fascists who were supported by 7000 police, is good enough for me to keep this description.

The chat with the police was about the mob, not the police's political leanings. I know a few coppers some of whom I count as friends s0 comments about sympathy are there to provoke views rather than a black or white impression. It would be great if some cops joined in, but I expect that we are too far away from West Wickham for them to be on this site.


Sadly I have now digressed into


Anti-fascists

Police sympathies

The history of the 1930s


But please do join in.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel privileged that you all feel you can use me to virtue signal at length about something most of you have NO first hand experience of- well, watch this if you dare....and watch 3 Girls....and it is all true.


>



And who broke the story on '3 girls'? It wasn't Tommy Robinson was it? It was a real investigative journalist called Andrew Norfolk. Stop swallowing the cool aid of the far right Uncleglen. And better still, stop posting it here.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I feel privileged that you all feel you can use

> me to virtue signal at length about something most

> of you have NO first hand experience of- well,

> watch this if you dare....and watch 3 Girls....and

> it is all true.

>

> >


>

> And who broke the story on '3 girls'? It wasn't

> Tommy Robinson was it? It was a real investigative

> journalist called Andrew Norfolk. Stop swallowing

> the cool aid of the far right Uncleglen. And

> better still, stop posting it here.



Well said.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But Thatcher is dead. Nobody since has brought the utilities back under public ownership (if that's the right term). So there are many people who could be blamed. Meanwhile the shareholders get richer and everyone else gets increasing bills and a poorer service. Plus as said above, a massive waste of a limited resource like water. Not to mention the polluted rivers and seas. At least the privatisation of the railways is being reversed. Hopefully water may be on the list somewhere.
    • That's really helpful. Do the Community Councils still exist? It sounds to me that whoever the contact is on the council who has sorted out the North Cross Road notice board and put the new list of councillors in it must at least have access to the key for that one? Unless it was one of the unlocked ones. And of course if somebody knows where the keys are, they may have no idea that people are looking for them or that this forum thread exists. Which are the notice boards which are not locked?  The very helpful locksmith near the station (?Callows?)  might be able to provide keys for them, or if not, new locks, in return for some local publicity? In fact, they may be able to advise in general, rather than keep trying unresponsive people at the council. But then of course there is still the question of who is going to take responsibility for putting appropriate East Dulwich community information into them and updating it as necessary.
    • Our residents' association used to have keys many moons ago, but when locks were changed, we tried everyone (including ward councillors) to get keys to no avail. A couple of boards are not locked. The Community Councils originally paid for all the notice boards in Dulwich. May have come under the Cleaner Greener budget.
    • Blame Margaret Thatcher - she started the privatization of public utilities.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...