Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Administrator


It's because in your previous incarnation as the

skin-crawling misogynist casual-racist Tony London

Suburbs you were banned for making the forum an

unpleasant place to be. Now you've come back the

admin team have allowed you a second chance

because we're nice like that.


In that case. Thank You.


Don't worry I would not dream of being put on the defensive to justify my views based on living in London since The Mid-1950's because I have noticed that while people outside a Forum might enjoy a vigorous Debate on various contentious and unspoken issues I fully realise that The Lounge is not a place where people state their views unless they are going to be endorsed and supported whole-heartedly so I respect that.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quia Differt Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I used exactly the same E-Mail address on

> returning

>

> Untruth .


At the end of the day this is your Forum and you have taken on the , sometimes, thankless , task of being The Administrator but I have always used my name in any E-Mail so while, I empthasize I have no desire at all to labour the point and continue this dialogue, that can not be true.

You are , genuinely, telling me I used another name ? That, simply, can not be true as I am the only one with access to any computer I own and that always been the case.


Just to edit the above the only thing I can think of is that one was my full name with ".co.uk" after it and the current one has ".com". but that is not, presumably, what you meant as the name is exactly the same .

  • Administrator

Quia Differt Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You are , genuinely, telling me I used another

> name ? That, simply, can not be true ...


No, I said you did not "use exactly the same E-Mail address on returning" as *shudders and feels queasy*, as Tony London Suburbs

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quia Differt Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > You are , genuinely, telling me I used another

> > name ? That, simply, can not be true ...

>

> No, I said you did not "use exactly the same

> E-Mail address on returning" as *shudders and

> feels queasy*, as Tony London Suburbs


So imagine my name is "SebastianTarquinFarquharson" and I used that name followed by ".co.uk" the first time and used exactly the same name again but this time with ".com" the second time :).


.It's just Edcam said I got " caught out " and its obvious from the above similar example that I was not trying to catch anyone out and yet you simply sad "Untruth" which would lead anyone to intrepret that as thinking I was lying and being deceitful ( hence being " caught out" ) so as the character " George" used to say in Black Adder " Clever ! " " Clever! ".


What did Malcolm Tucker say about " Semantics" in The Thick Of It ? :)

Yes and you're digressing from the name of this thread, so can we get back to that and if you wish to play semantics, I suggest you either play tit for tat with Admin via private message or or on a separate thread. And don't forget, Admin is the Darth Vader of the Forum, it can giveth and taketh away at the swipe of a keyboard key.

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes and you're digressing from the name of this

> thread, so can we get back to that and if you wish

> to play semantics, I suggest you either play tit

> for tat with Admin via private message or or on a

> separate thread. And don't forget, Admin is the

> Darth Vader of the Forum, it can giveth and taketh

> away at the swipe of a keyboard key.


Yes you are and Admin are right so I will say no more but the word "Untruth" was said publicly hence my Public riposte.


Anyway I had no desire AT ALL to deflect away from this thread about Louisa but when Edcam publicly says "caught out" again I would say that the rejoinder has, also, to be in Public.

NewWave Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quia Differt Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Bland leading The Bland :)

>

>

> That sums up the way ED is becoming...not just the

> forum but the area generally.

> Bland with s*** transport


I always just assumed I wasn't invited to all the raucous parties :)

Louisa always majors on the fact that she is a "working class voice" on a very dull EDF. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that she is really an upper middle class woman who was expensively educated and who feels so guilty about her background that she posts incessantly about the virtues of working class culture.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa was a nightmare always negative and rude

> and only wanted to argue with people.EDF is better

> place without her


What's your contribution to the EDF that makes you more worthy than Louisa?

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa was a nightmare always negative and rude

> and only wanted to argue with people.EDF is better

> place without her


I disagree. Although she often expresses herself very directly, I can't recall her descending to the personal and sometimes abusive, level that seem to be the tone of some of your posts. She's not a bully, in other words.


Most genuine newcomers join in gently. You seem to have come in in stirrer mode and I'm wondering if perhaps you're a new ID of a previous forumite?

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa was a nightmare always negative and rude

> and only wanted to argue with people.EDF is better

> place without her



disagree...variety is the spice of life and quite frankly makes for an interesting forum.

So what if not everyone shares Louisa's views.

so what if she likes to bang her particular 'drum' talking about class.

you can chose to share her views or not.

personally I can't abide smug middle class attitudes-I grew up on a council estate yet as a homeowner I would suppose I am now 'middle class' but god forbid I ever become a boring NIMBY like some of the plonkers on here!

NewWave Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ollieloudon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa was a nightmare always negative and

> rude

> > and only wanted to argue with people.EDF is

> better

> > place without her

>

>

> disagree...variety is the spice of life and quite

> frankly makes for an interesting forum.

> So what if not everyone shares Louisa's views.

> so what if she likes to bang her particular 'drum'

> talking about class.

> you can chose to share her views or not.

> personally I can't abide smug middle class

> attitudes-I grew up on a council estate yet as a

> homeowner I would suppose I am now 'middle class'

> but god forbid I ever become a boring NIMBY like

> some of the plonkers on here!



Well said

?but god forbid I ever become a boring NIMBY like some of the plonkers on here!?


Louisa was (and will be again?) one of the biggest NIMBYs on the Forum. So many things she didn?t want in her back yard including music festivals in Peckham Rye Park, designer hamburgers and pizza, Marks and Spencer ... the list goes on. Nimbyism cuts across all classes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...