Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Construction work has begun on the new health centre at the site of the old Dulwich hospital.


The local NHS is now looking at services that will be provided in the new health centre.


The 8 to 8 (Extended Primary Care) Service offers extra GP and nurse appointments from 8am to 8pm seven days week. The service is available at two locations in Southwark; Lister Primary Care Centre in Peckham and Spa Medical Centre in Bermondsey.


The NHS are proposing that from 2020, the service for the south of the borough, now based at the Lister Primary Care Centre, relocates to the planned new Dulwich Health Centre.


The NHS wants to hear what our patients and stakeholders views are about this proposed move. If you are registered at a GP practice in south Southwark (Camberwell, Peckham, Dulwich or Nunhead), please complete this short survey -


https://www.engage.england.nhs.uk/survey/28a33015/


The deadline for completing the survey is 22 June 2018. If you require a paper copy, please call 020 7525 7888.

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you, have filled it out.

>

> The idea of being seen by a nurse rather than a

> doctor as asked in the survey is of concern.


I was recently offered an emergency appointment with the nurse practitioner for an acute condition at my GPs surgery and was very happy with the consultation and outcome

Slight biased as I asked for this.

Providing a service for the south of Southwark from the south of Southwark - the Lister is located in the middle - makes good sense.


I hope others will welcome the improvement in local GP services this represents.

Presumably being co located with SELDOC will also mean both services can cross support each other.


Hi BicBasher,

Lister is on 6 bus routes and 6 bus routes are very nearby to Dulwich Hospital. Lister has controlled parking and no parking for visitors. The Dulwich Hospital is currently not located in controlled parking but will have car parking for visitors. Lister is not near a train station but thE Dulwich centre will be.


hi se22cat,

I think they mean a nurse practitioner rather than nurse. Some practices offer paramedics, pharmacists, nurse practitioners as well as doctors. Even A&E use nurses for triage before access to doctors.

For aome reason I had thought this centre would continue to offer some hospital services and this would be based on local need. Will people be able to get blood tests etc.. as has been the case? What about physiotherapy and rehab? It sounds as though the function has moved on considerably from what was being stated a few years ago? Can anyone say what services will be on offer here?

>

> Hi BicBasher,

> Lister is on 6 bus routes and 6 bus routes are

> very nearby to Dulwich Hospital. Lister has

> controlled parking and no parking for visitors.

> The Dulwich Hospital is currently not located in

> controlled parking but will have car parking for

> visitors. Lister is not near a train station but

> thE Dulwich centre will be.


Of which only two stop outside the current hospital, which serve Peckham and Camberwell. The other 4 involve a walk either from East Dulwich Grove/Lordship Lane or Grove Vale/Melbourne Grove which largely serve East Dulwich. Not as great as having six direct bus routes outside the centre. This leaves disabled or older patients either having to wait for a 37 or 42 or slowly walk up the road.


While car access is welcomed, there will be a certain percentage who use public transport.

This asks 2 questions only (really) - have you ever been referred to the Lister and would you mind being seen by a nurse instead of a doctor? There are some 'how was it for you' questions if you have been referred to The Lister, but no probing questions to steer answers into useful areas (waiting times, cleanliness, ease of access, effect and so on). Most of the questionnaire is taken by demographics, but whilst it asks race and sexuality it doesn't ask age or any disability - both of which are relevant, I would have thought, to access issues, nor does it use any form of postcode check to see comparative proximity to The Lister or Dulwich Hospital. Or, in other words, it's a pretty useless questionnaire, designed to show consultation has taken place without really undertaking any meaningful information collection. If the NHS has actually pad a consultant to derive useful information for them, then they've been robbed! This is, at best, a weak PR exercise.

I don?t think the questionnaire is that bad, the ?how was it for you? questions give greater scope for a more detailed, nuanced answer than a question such as ?On a scale of 1 to 10, how clean did you find the facility? which gives no scope for the ?yes but ...? answer. Had I ever attended at Lister, I would welcome the opportunity of answering the more open ended questions.


Anyway, regardless of whether it?s a well designed questionnaire or not, or whether it?s a mere PR stunt, we should not lose site of the fact that within a couple of years (or so!), at last, there will be a brand new health facility in the area.

I don?t think the questionnaire is that bad, the ?how was it for you? questions give greater scope for a more detailed, nuanced answer than a question such as ?On a scale of 1 to 10, how clean did you find the facility? which gives no scope for the ?yes but ...? answer. Had I ever attended at Lister, I would welcome the opportunity of answering the more open ended questions.


Agreed that open-ended questions can elucidate a richer response - but please note (I speak as a former member of the MRS) (1) This is normally done in the context of a framework of more directed questions, either using a Likert scale (i.e. 1-5) or simple binary questions or other analysis context, and (2) proper data analysis of open ended questions, which, for a piece of quantitative research requires post coding (rather than pre-coding, this isn't about postcodes!) is difficult and expensive. I'm willing to bet that this group have neither the skill nor the money to use this information in any sensible way.


Without demographic information on e.g. age (although apparently my response will be analysed on the basis of whether I'm a lesbian or not) and particularly, in this context, disability this 'research' isn't frankly, worth a candle.


Nor is the self selecting nature of the research sample capable of supplying information of any statistical significance.


Not that there are any opposition councillors anymore, but someone should challenge the 'local NHS' if they make any claims whatsoever as a 'result' of this exercise - which I suspect has the clear fingerprints of those wanting to make these changes in Southwark come what may - which is all about re-use of public property within our bit of SE London. That may actually be just the NHS - but I have my doubts.

I would much rather be seen by a nurse (and many of them are specialist practitioners) who will have more time to listen, be caring, and give advice than a Dr who has 6 mins allocated appt time and is tired and stressed and rushed off their feet. A nurse will refer and ask for advice from a Dr if she/he is concerned.
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No and Wes Streeting is heading in this direction because he knows the NHS is broken and was never built to cope with the demands currently being placed on it. A paid-for approach in some shape or form, and massive reforms, is the only way the NHS can survive - neither of which the left or unions will be pleased about.  
    • Labour talks about, and hopefully will do something about, the determinants of poor health.  They're picked up the early Sunak policy on smoking and vapes.  Let's see how far they tackle obesity and inactivity. I'd rather the money was spent on these any other interventions eg mental health, social care and SEN, rather than seeing the NHS as income generating.
    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...