Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There?s trouble at mill, maybe a good time to resurrect the camera stellata, or do we call it star chamber.


A little smoke and mirrors, called debt ceiling problem, then.

Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to present to you the new star chamber, please give it up for the super congress.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why are you talking to suburban English people

> about setting up a medieval tribunal in a foreign

> political institution?

>

> What relevance has the debt ceiling to the

> criminal prosecution of scapegoats?

>

> Is this a copy and paste gone wrong?


If you are unable to see the comparison or the implication, I am sorry but I cannot help you.


Your obsession with copy and pasting is somewhat worrying.

I cannot believe I have to repeat this.

But if you take information from your brain, then type said information in to your keyboard and thus place that information on to this forum, that is a form of copy and pasting.

From the brain (copy) to the forum (paste).

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it far more likely NN that you can't

> explain yourself because you don't know what

> you're talking about.


As ever, you are entitled to your opinion.

Now, as this subject has been done to death.


Can we have a new one?


How about:


The Hypocrisy of the Catholic Church ( country by country of course )


If not that, can we do:


Fluid Engineering " The wonder of the one-way Catheter valve "



Many thanks



Nette(tu)

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now, as this subject has been done to death.

>

> Can we have a new one?

>

> How about:

>

> The Hypocrisy of the Catholic Church ( country by

> country of course )

>

> If not that, can we do:

>

> Fluid Engineering " The wonder of the one-way

> Catheters valve "

>

>

> Many thanks

>

>

> Nette(tu)



you are funny

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How quick could you spend $400 billion?

> 100 years

> 1000 years

>

> US can spend it in just over a month, looks like

> IOU?s until November.



i can live for today too..an easy trap really. i was never taught to live in a careful manner..we'll apart from getting a good job.. but i see all sorts spending spending spending without much thought for conserving. its a bit addictive spending and having and feeding on things. not surprised the USA is addicted to having, yet is unsympathetic to those that dont have.. as i said live for today way of living

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mockney piers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > no YOU'RE a smelly poo. Touched you last.

>

>

> I?m glad my pot and kettle comment found resonance

> with you,

> Might be time for you to adopt the fetal position,

> and have a little nap.



Just had to say that this was particularly amusing!

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > New Nexus Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Does anyone here know what the (Prompt

> > Corrective Action Act) is?

> >

> > Is the pope Catholic?!

> >

> > Well, put (in laymans terms - for those of a

> > lesser mind) the Prompt Corrective Action is a

> US

> > federal law mandating progressive penalties

> > against banks that exhibit progressively

> > deteriorating capital ratios. At the lower

> > extreme, a critically undercapitalized Federal

> > Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-regulated

> > institution (i.e., one with a ratio of total

> > capital / assets below 2%) is required to be

> taken

> > into receivership by the FDIC in order to

> minimize

> > long-term losses to the FDIC.[1] The motivation

> > behind the law is to provide incentives for

> banks

> > to address problems while they are still small

> > enough to be manageable.

> >

> > Ask me another - go on. Ask me.

>

>

> At last.

> Can you tell me why (Prompt Corrective Action Act)

> was not implemented by Paulson nor Geithner,

> regarding the banks involvement in subprime, given

> that it was their duty to implement said Act



I really don't care


The End.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always stay for the closing credits...

> http://www.newgre.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/F

> in.jpg



always needing to be the last in the spotlight?

Scylla100 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Woah, stock market is diving.

>

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/sep/02/mar

> ket-falls-us-jobs-barack-obama-george-osborne

>

> Where's that bloody Keynes when ya need 'im?

>

> Scylla


On a Sukhoi Su-7 jet between Chicago and Austria with a return ticket.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have your conspirancy theories plumbed new depths

> with the claim that Keynesian Economics was a

> communist attack on the USA?


http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/28/609733-587627_bear_traps_super_large.jpg " Tum tee tum..."

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have your conspirancy theories plumbed new depths

> with the claim that Keynesian Economics was a

> communist attack on the USA?


You may think that,

but I could not possibly comment.


Comrade

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone like the Keiser Report from Russia

> Today?


Yes, have followed his and Stacy Herbert?s work for a few years. If you go to www.rt.com you can watch past episodes.


He has another program called On the Edge with Max Keiser.


If you find this stuff interesting you may also want to take a look at,

http://www.corbettreport.com/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...