Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And on that happy note, I am off to bed, not

> before counting All those gold nuggets under my

> goose-feathered pillow.


Nighty night Frankito on that very happy note where the taxpayers have secured your job and wealth...


For others, I shall start imparting my knowledge:


Super Rich: The Greed game a programme from the BBC.

Why do people have to get so nasty and personal?


If your argument is sound you don't need to resort to personal attacks.


Everyone has different opinions based primarily on their differing life experiences and instead of pointing fingers and blaming individuals for a system that is rotten, wouldn't it be better to try to explain your position and try to pursuade with your argument?

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And on that happy note, I am off to bed, not

> before counting All those gold nuggets under my

> goose-feathered pillow.


Yes you need to be up bright and early to do all that front running trades, plus high volume skimming. And lets not forget about drowning a Bag of kittens.

The Price of Fear


A new study shows people with brain damage that impaired their ability to experience emotions such as fear outperformed other people in an investment game.


The brain-damaged participants were more willing to take risks that yielded high payoffs.

They were less likely to react emotionally to losses.

They finished the game with 13% more money than other players.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remember seeing something about that on TV.

>

> I wonder if they would get similar results from

> politicians or corporate bosses.


http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/cartoons/2003/07/08/bell512.jpg

So, fresh on the heels of calling these people liars, cheats, and fraudsters, you're now calling them brain damaged?


Then iamhere comes on and complains about name-calling?


What do you call hypocrites who have absolutely no sense of proportion, demonstrate delusional messiah complexes, make sweeping generalizations about groups of people, use fabricated quotes, deny evidence, indulge in self-reinforcing hysteria about the 'end times', and resolutely refuse to engage in meaningful debate?


Nutters? ;-)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, fresh on the heels of calling these people

> liars, cheats, and fraudsters, you're now calling

> them brain damaged?

>

> Then iamhere comes on and complains about

> name-calling?

>

> What do you call hypocrites who have absolutely no

> sense of proportion, demonstrate delusional

> messiah complexes, make sweeping generalizations

> about groups of people, use fabricated quotes,

> deny evidence, indulge in self-reinforcing

> hysteria about the 'end times', and resolutely

> refuse to engage in meaningful debate?

>

> Nutters? ;-)


Oppps, wrong again, Mr blah, Blah.

I have not called anyone brain damaged merely point to an article in the The Wall Street Journal.


Now, I do believe your captain has told you not to indulge me, naughty, naughty.

Now go stand in the corner, or sit on the naughty step.


http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB112190164023291519,00.html

Only someone with the petulance and egotism of a child could imagine they could get away with claiming that drawing attention to an article such as that one is not the same thing as calling bankers brain-damaged.


You sound like a twattish schoolboy trying to get away with an offence on a 'technicality'.


Regarding being 'told you not to indulge me', do you really you have a carte blanche to carry on behaving like a prat?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only someone with the petulance and egotism of a

> child could imagine they could get away with

> claiming that drawing attention to an article such

> as that one is not the same thing as calling

> bankers brain-damaged.

>

> You sound like a twattish schoolboy trying to get

> away with an offence on a 'technicality'.

>

> Regarding being 'told you not to indulge me', do

> you really you have a carte blanche to carry on

> behaving like a prat?


And here you go again talking with that potty mouth,

If you are going to talk down to people, then please expect the same in return.


Now go and have your juice-box and calm down.

To be fair Hugo, he was pointing out a piece of research that suggests top level bankers may have different brain make-ups than others.


There are many different types of personalties that are linked to many different brain compositions and it would seem to be self-evident that different types of people are attracted to or excel in different spheres.


I am not sure why you need to shoot the messenger when he was simply drawing attention to an interesting article which looks at research in this area.

Ha ha - if you really believe that LD, I'd be staggered.


To be fair - he intended nothing of the sort.


He used 'brain damage', not 'make-up'. He used the word 'brain damage' twice. What you're indulging in is called 'revisionism'. It's like getting caught stealing and claiming you were only 'borrowing'. ;-)

I'm fed up with this thread - I've not been able to summon enough enthusiasm to point out the very obvious failings in NNs and his / her supporter's arguments. Loz and Hugenot have held the line but it's time to close off this thread.


One final quotation from a recognised and reputable source - this thread was created by "a poor player - That struts and frets his hour upon the stage - And then is heard no more: it is a tale - Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, - Signifying nothing."

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha ha - if you really believe that LD, I'd be

> staggered.

>

> To be fair - he intended nothing of the sort.

>

> He used 'brain damage', not 'make-up'. He used the

> word 'brain damage' twice. What you're indulging

> in is called 'revisionism'. It's like getting

> caught stealing and claiming you were only

> 'borrowing'. ;-)


The great wizard knows my intent now ?he intended nothing of the sort.?


I did not say ?brain damaged?, I pointed to an article that spoke of brain damage. You really must pay attention. Please try and take time to go to said article and check for yourself.

Maybe an afternoon nap.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm fed up with this thread - I've not been able

> to summon enough enthusiasm to point out the very

> obvious failings in NNs and his / her supporter's

> arguments. Loz and Hugenot have held the line but

> it's time to close off this thread.

>

> One final quotation from a recognised and

> reputable source - this thread was created by "a

> poor player - That struts and frets his hour upon

> the stage - And then is heard no more: it is a

> tale - Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, -

> Signifying nothing."


Are we doing quotes now?

You cannot, sir, take from me any thing that I will more willingly part withal: except my life.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...