Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I had 3 Council enforcement officers approach me in Dulwich Park last week to explain about some new dog control order that is due to come in to force in a few months. They showed me a map of some local cemeteries which I would never walk a dog in out of respect and point in the general direction of some areas of the park where it will be ?illegal? to have your dog off the lead. I express my astonishment that you can?t let a well controlled dog off its lead to exercise it in a public park as has been the case since the park opened over 100 years ago! They explained about police involvement, fines and criminal records should dog owners let their dogs off the lead once the new rules are enforced. They were both aggressive, arrogant and dismissive in their attitude. I?m relatively new to the areas so I know I missed the consultantion. I?d be very intersected to see the response but cant seem to find them online. I agree with dogs not being allowed in children?s play areas, picnic areas, cemeteries, fouling etc.... Given the recent tragic attacks and deaths in London along with the terror threat I?d be interested to see if the police are actually going to get involved with this nonsense.

I think the enforecement would be interesting.


Perhaps they'll look at having dogs chipped so all 'off-lead-in wrong-place-dogs' can be scanned and a fine sent to the registered owners.


Rather efficient, but also extremely extreme and I think they would do better to stop uncontrolled dog ownership/ dog fighting/ cruelty to animals etc.

It was made compulsory for all dogs to be microchipped a couple of years back so in theory they can already do that, J&B.


More info on the new order, which is already in force, here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/parks-and-open-spaces/public-space-protection-orders-pspos-regulations


I find this blurb from the Govt website interesting as perception of danger seems to be as important as whether your dog is actually out of control:


'Your dog is considered dangerously out of control if it:

- injures someone

- makes someone worried that it might injure them


A court could also decide that your dog is dangerously out of control if either of the following apply:

- it attacks someone?s animal

- the owner of an animal thinks they could be injured if they tried to stop your dog attacking their animal'

There have been notices for years about keeping dogs on short lead in Dulwich park. Dogs can go free on the dog walk around the perimeter of the park. Most people don?t keep their dogs on leads where they should. I saw a dog rummage through a large quantity of rubbish which had been dumped but the owners were totally oblivious. The dog would have eaten all sorts of nasty things.
I've had a couple of picnics in the park interrupted by dogs stealing food and / or knocking everything over. I've also had dogs jumping up and barking at me as I jog. The truth is that there are a lot of people who have their dogs off the lead and out of control (not a majority, but still a lot) and it's pretty unreasonable. It's a shame that people aren't all considerate and responsible, but they're not and it should be possible for others to go out their 'park business' unharassed.

Walking my dog twice a day in the park on weekdays come rain or shine I cannot remember seeing any of what you state happening.


I am sure it must happen at the weekend when the park is jammed but weekdays is a different matter.


Most owners are responsible and keep their dogs under control when off the lead. I for one would not dream of going into Dulwich Park with my dog at the weekend when it gets taken over.


I remember seeing these wardens on their bikes full of self importance. The did seem very full of themselves.

Rupert, you sound like a responsible owner, so good for you, but not everyone is unfortunately. I do Nordic walking and almost every time I'm out at least one loose dog will run up barking, I guess because they're not sure what the poles are about, and I often get friendlier dogs jumping up - none of which is a problem for me as I love dogs, but for someone who didn't it could be intimidating. A couple of weeks ago a big dog off the lead in the nature reserve got quite aggressive and as the owner wasn't in sight I got a bit worried. Several times dogs have grabbed the poles, which is quite funny for me, but wouldn't be if I were an older person using them for stability.

Hurah. At last! Positive action being taken. There are signs uk which owners ignore, and there is dog exercising track which some owners ignore. So all in all I am really pleased about this. Those who are responsible will take note of the rules and exercise their dogs within those rules. Those who don?t will get a fine.


Some dogs off the lead are a danger to children and park users.

rupert james Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Walking my dog twice a day in the park on weekdays

> come rain or shine I cannot remember seeing any of

> what you state happening.


Oh well, it can't of happened then.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do Nordic walking and almost every time I'm out at

> least one loose dog will run up barking


Not unless Rupert has seen it. If he hasn't seen it, it hasn't happened.

I saw a warden speaking to some people outside the caf? one day earlier this week as some owners had their dogs off lead, which could be a problem with people eating outside. He seemed perfectly polite and friendly and took the time to explain why he was asking them to put their dogs on lead.


Rupert, check out the area outside the caf? and around the lake most weekdays between nine and eleven, there are plenty of off lead dogs in an area clearly signposted as on lead. Not saying that any of these dogs are causing problems, but the potential is there with other people's food and/or waterfowl nearby.

cazfay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hurah. At last! Positive action being taken. There

> are signs uk which owners ignore, and there is dog

> exercising track which some owners ignore. So all

> in all I am really pleased about this. Those who

> are responsible will take note of the rules and

> exercise their dogs within those rules. Those who

> don?t will get a fine.

>

> Some dogs off the lead are a danger to children

> and park users.


Those who are likely to heed these, IMO ridiculous, rules are the least likely to own untrained dogs in the first place

I?m totally confused - what are the new regulations? I walk my dog daily on the path in the morning - she is meek and follows at my heel. I always clean up after her. I don?t want to walk the overgrown path in the winter because it?s wet, muddy and honestly as a woman on my own it doesn?t feel safe to walk through undergrowth where you?re not visible to the general public. Honestly I?ve run through some sections realising it can be quite dark even in daytime.


So are we saying that I risk getting a fine for walking the path or risk getting robbed \ raped \ muddy for taking the overgrown path?


This is a public space. If I have understood this correctly, it?s very sad news indeed.

Have you clicked the link above and read the details of the order, ali2007? For our local parks the main points amount to clearing up after your dog, putting it on a lead when asked by an authorised person and keeping it out of the children's play area, plus obeying any existing signs about keeping your dog on a lead in specific areas. Seems reasonsble to me.


I'd love to see more enforcement in Dulwich Woods. Yesterday between 12 and 1 I counted about ten dogs off the lead in the nature reserve, several chasing birds despite the notices about breeding season, There was also a woman on a bike so they could deal with all the other antisocial behaviour as well.

ali2007 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> So are we saying that I risk getting a fine for

> walking the path or risk getting robbed \ raped \

> muddy for taking the overgrown path?


Rather overdramatic, but anyway, no. As noted on another heated thread on here, the road and horse track are not dog-free or on-lead areas so as long as you keep him/her out of the clearly marked no dog or onlead areas you won't be fined.


> This is a public space. If I have understood this

> correctly, it?s very sad news indeed.


Public places need rules, indeed more so than most places. Just because it's a public place doesn't imply the public can do what they want in it. That road in Dulwich Park would be ideal for me to practice timetrialling on, I don't because there are speed rules in place and it would be selfish and stupid to do so. These new dog rules, or rather mainly the enforcement of extant rules, seem a perfectly sensible and proportionate way of balancing the rights and needs of all park users.

ali2007 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ahhhh if it?s just an enforcement of the existing

> signs that indicate where dogs need to be on a

> lead, I?ve no issue with that.


Or if your dog is, or is thought to be, out of control - which sounds very unlikely in your case! Most decent dog owners wouldn't need to be asked as when you see your dog misbehaving or someone looking worried about them, the first thing you do is call your dog away and/or put it back on the lead. I think the new order is more for the small minority who aren't responsible.

As someone who regularly walks her dogs in Dulwich Park, I wouldn't mind a bit of clarification. Are the areas in the middle of the park, where it's quite confusing in terms of where dogs can and can't be off lead, now going to be policed? There are several paths with 'dogs should be on lead signs' which cross over paths where dogs seem to be allowed off lead. It's very hard for dogs and owners to negotiate open areas since obviously, dogs can't read, and most quite innocently follow their noses when they're out at play. The pond area, children's play areas, and other sorts of enclosures are very easy to avoid with a well-behaved dog. I should say that I keep one of my dogs on lead everywhere in the park as she's quite mischievous, but my other one is very well-behaved, so when we get into the main part of the park, I generally let her off, and have never had any issues with her.

There are signs near each entrance stating 5mph max for bicycles. This is very slow - only 1.5 x walking pace. Do any cyclists adhere to this...? Almost none - some belt round at 25mph doing their training sessions.


Will the council be enforcing this rule as well..?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...