Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi - has anyone received a final bill yet for the major works completed in 2016? Also is anyone aware of any one raising a legal challenge to the amounts paid? The works to my property included painting and some pointing and I've so far been charged an estimated cost of ?18,000! Thanks
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/191360-southwark-major-works/
Share on other sites

As well as work directly on your flat you might expect to share the costs of (a) scaffolding to work on the property (b) work on common parts shared by different establishments © work on electrical or plumbing services from which you take a shared benefit and (d) work on roofs even where you are not on the top floor - so more than just work on the fabric that you lease. However you should get what itemisation you can - if you are being asked to share costs on work which was exclusively undertaken on other properties (i.e. not common or shared elements) you may have a case, as you would if works charged for weren't in fact undertaken, of if charges for specific works were disproportionate as regards the scale, scope or quality of the work undertaken. Even now that the council and councillors are all of the same party you should still expect support from your local councillor if you feel that the charges are unfair or wrong.

Council tenants have no financial 'interest' in the property (i.e. cannot benefit from increases in value - putting aside the whole 'right to buy' issue) - that interest (in preserving the value of the property through repair and refurbishment) sits with the council (or housing association) for tenanted properties - they will need to demonstrate that the overall cost of the works is being shared equitably between leaseholders and the landlord for non-leasehold properties. There should be no cross-subsidy - although clearly council tenants, who can take no fiscal benefit from the works, cannot be expected either to pay for them. Any possible cross subsidy would be between leaseholders and the council for non-leasehold properties. How the council recoups their costs for non-leasehold properties is up to them - either through rents or local taxes (or through selling some capital assets to pay for the upkeep of others).


Capital works (repair or refurbishment) either preserve or improve the value of property - those without a stake in that value (i.e. council tenants) are, it seems to me, more reasonably excused the costs of these, even where they benefit from living in a 'better' environment. The same would be true of private tenants benefiting from such works undertaken by a private landlord.

Hi


I can't help but I do remember a number of threads on the forum about this over the years, many in the same position as yourself. As an example (with some potentially helpful contact details) see here: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1555979,page=1


I do remember another thread about someone who had asked for an itemized invoice and through this was able to show she was being charged for communal works which were never carried out.

Hi lordship girl,

Do challenge. Perhaps worth joining seeking advice from http://www.las2000.org Leaseholders Associate of southwark who are well versed in fighting such bills.


Also perhaps worth noting. Around 30 houses in East Dulwich the council own the freehold but both flats are leasehold. I'm always amazed those leaseholders have followed the leaseholder enfranchisement and bought the freehold form the council - as i the leaseholders right. If this is you then you can calculate what the cost of doing this would be via one of many online calculators - https://www.freeholdcalculator.com/freehold_choose.php this is the first ot pop up in a Google search.

We are also still awaiting our final bill from 2016.

I had so many issues with saltash, but got their attention pretty quickly when I emailed Southwark council CEO and cc?d in Helen Hayes together with saltash contact and any council contacts we had met along the way.


3 lots of scaffolding on same area where pointing was missed, I?ve really put them through the ringer, not let them get away with anything, workmanship is shoddy to say the least.


I?m paying on DD so I?m not yet at a point that I have paid them more than I assume the work should have cost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
    • I look to the future and clearly see that the law of unintended consequences will apply with a vengeance and come 2029 Labour will voted out of office. As someone once said 'The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...