Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes my two lovely daughters have both had chicken pox recently.

No neither of them are infectious anymore.

Yes the youngest in particular is very gruesome looking with her incredibly scabby appearance following her severe bout of the pox which is only recently come to its conclusion.

BUT i am going to be venturing to local play areas with them this week following a 3 week forced house imprisonment with them both.

Please do not think i am stupid or uncaring enough to take them out if there is any, any, any! possibility of them infecting other children or adults or pregnant women.

THEY ARE NOT INFECTIOUS

so to the mums/carers/dads etc that saw my eldest daughter recently when we ventured out between their bouts of said virus and criticized me for carelessly taking an infectious child to a public area and pulled their off spring away from her as if we were ringing a bell and declaring 'the plague, the plague' .....


SHE WAS NOT INFECTIOUS - chicken pox is not infectious once the blisters have scabbed and dried

THE YOUNGEST IS NOT NOW INFECTIOUS -

I AM NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO TAKE AN INFECTIOUS CHILD TO A CHILDRENS PLAY AREA !!!


They just look scabby!!!!! bless them....


thank you.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19085-im-going-to-warn-dulwich/
Share on other sites

Poor you Louloulabelle. I remember how my daughter looked when she had the chickenpox. Having had 30 spots on her forehead alone I remember looking at her one night and thinking she looked like she had some sort of medevil plague. I can understand why some misinformed people do get anxious about the look of it but my daughter did find people staring at her very upsetting.I found a bit of bio oil a baseball cap and long sleeves seemed to do the trick. Although the scabs are sometimes nasty it did seem to fade really quickly once the blisters had burst.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Genuine question- are wild flowers/weeds better for wildlife than cultivated flowers? My cultivated flowers and their seeds attract birds, bees and all kinds of insects, maybe more so than wild flowers.
    • Sue. It's a long journey trying to change the long established mindset that many of us grew up with, namely cultivated flowers are good and wild flowers anywhere other than in the wild are bad. My job as a child was to go round pulling up all the dandelions that dared to invade my Dad's pride and joy of a garden. I still battle with my Mum, trying in vain to convince her of the benefits of so called weeds in her garden. Her neighbours, all of a certain age, are the same. Anyone who doesn't attack any weed with gusto is the subject of Mum's disapproving neighbours. We can only keep trying to convince others of the benefits of these much maligned flowers.  
    • You might leave copies of this post on the windscreens of any cars that you think may have been issued with parking tickets before you saw the suspension notices being put up.  Include some contact details -- at least your forum username -- so that the owners can contact you if they wish to dispute the tickets on the ground of unlawfulness. Eventual feedback here -- presumably this would be evidence of a cancellation of any such tickets  -- would be very welcome.  
    • I've got more problems with people paving over their gardens, plastic grass and the like.  Perhaps see what Southwark say on line about managing their pavements.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...