Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't know how many ED residents use this route, but if you do, there are proposals to change the Nunhead end of the route. Some Nunhead residents has stated that they would like the route to be extended to New Cross Bus Garage via Queen's Rd. Is this what you would wish for?




78 bus route consultation


Renata

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19082-78-bus-consultation-now-closed/
Share on other sites

spanglysteve- from the consultation document it looks like the proposed change to the 78 is only to send it a slightly different way from the (current) stand to the first stop. So not really life changing then...

Whereas we would actually like the 63 extending by three whole, greedy stops. Entirely too much to ask, apparently.


I don't personally see the point of the 78 change- have they been having noise complaints since going double decker?

It remains to be seen what will happen with the 78 bus route as the consultation doesn't end until tomorrow. However in reply to previous posting, there has been a lot of local upset about double deckers going down very narrow roads - increased noise, pollution and speed.


Claire

The request for the route to be extended to New Cross has come from the Nunhead Voice (formerly the Nunhead Community Forum, they've changed their name to match their magazine).There were complaints from Ansdell Rd Residents as the road is very narrow, when the bus went double decker. TFL have proposed altering the route to go down Lausanne Rd instead. The residents group plus some users of the SouthEastforum, Nunhead section have raised this too. There have not been any suggestions to alter the current route from Nunhead Lane, by the Rye and up through Rye Lane.


In terms of the 63 extension, that all of the Peckham Rye Councillors (Myself, Victoria Mills and Gavin Edwards) plus Valerie Shawcross have been lobbying for, this was turned down by both TFL and Boris on economic grounds. TFL costed the 4 bus stop extension to Honor Oak Rise at 600k a year! They say there wouldn't be sufficient extra paid for journeys to warrant the additional cost. The also say that customers can use the P12 or P4 instead? (very different routes to the 63). The extension of the 484 to Sainsbury's at DKH was also looked into. I think it was dismissed on the grounds that there are more users wishing to go the Denmark Hill (train, hospitals etc) and Camberwell than to Sainsbury's and the looping into the car park would cause significant delays to the route. On altering the 343 route or making the buses single decker at the Nunhead end, this was also discounted.


Hi Nunhead Claire, in answer to your question, the 78 route does through part of my ward which includes the Eastern part of East Dulwich, west and south Nunhead (eg parts of Linden Grove, Nunhead Lane and Ivydale Rd)and the Southwark part of Honor Oak. Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Some Facebook groups I am in are, or  have become,  private groups, because there are  so many trolls on FB. Including a group set up to discuss birds 🙄 There are probably downsides to that as the admin has to approve all prospective members, who have to agree to certain rules I think, and I'm not sure it's failsafe. It's certainly time consuming for the admin. But probably less time consuming than having to pre approve all posts?
    • That rubbish is a health and safety issue. It could easily fall on someone walking underneath it.
    • A town square would be nice. Perhaps we could pedestrianise North cross Road and create a square at the junction of Lordship Lane. Can't imagine there would be any objections / controversy.  This is probably true, but the issue is not so much the level of the rent, but the degree to which it is sustainable in the context of the local market. The Landlords locally do seem to have squeezed rents to the point where places can no longer survive in many cases. Think the furore was largely manufactured tbf.
    • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14774205/Urgent-warning-opioid-deaths-Met-Police-pills-heroin-nightclubs.html?ito=email_share_article-top   I'm sharing this article to help to spread the word about these new deadly synthetic opioids called Nitazenes which are finding their way onto the drug scene.  Two more young lives lost last weekend in young people at a South London club.    Most people I talk to have never heard of Nitazenes which are being used as contaminants in a number of other drugs including sleeping pills like valium and Xanax, oxycodone but have also been found in vapes and sedative antihistamines and cocaine.  So people buying sleeping tablets and other substances have no idea of the risk they are taking.  This is a relatively new trend and the number of deaths is on the increase.  Do discuss it with your teenagers and young adult children and anyone you know tempted to purchase sleeping tablets online.  It really is a much more dangerous and potentially lethal time to buy tablets online or on the street and hopefully knowledge of Nitazenes can help people protect themselves.  This stuff is in London and no doubt, is already in Dulwich so do spread the word.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...