Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> clothes and closed - with a questionable business

> model?



The Mary Portas one, is it Living and Giving? Or the one near the station, Clothes for Causes, which I always thought was more of a lifestyle support system for someone who wanted to build a profile as some sort of sustainability vlogger.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> clothes and closed - with a questionable business

> model?


There was one called Give and Take next to EDT which became Question Air and has now changed its name to something else

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wasn't there one on LL that sold 'expensive'

> > clothes and closed - with a questionable

> business

> > model?

>


>

> The Mary Portas one, is it Living and Giving? Or

> the one near the station, Clothes for Causes,

> which I always thought was more of a lifestyle

> support system for someone who wanted to build a

> profile as some sort of sustainability vlogger.



The one with the questionable business model was Give and Take, now closed.


Though maybe Clothes for Causes did as well.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a lot of time of most of our local charity

> shops, but one in particular, is extremely rude

> and not very charitable at all. Hopefully the new

> one will be nice like most of the others.

>

> Louisa.




Would that be the smallest one, by any chance?

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The floor space isn?t huge inside, but some of the

> egos that help out are. One particular member of

> staff is incredibly rude and doesn?t even try to

> hide it.

>



Is this the shop which has been discussed on here before due to weird random exclusions of particular items from offers publicised in the shop?

Yes Sue it is. And I know people have suggested previously that some of the helpers may have certain health related issues, but there is no excuse for rummaging through a donated bag of goods in front of customers and the person kind enough to donate them, and suggesting said donated items are not wanted or they have too much already. It?s iust plain rude. If someone is kind enough to donate, these people should at least show some gratitude. The lovely people at St Christopher?s are always pleased with any donation, and always so thankful.


Louisa.

spark67 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's a shelter charity shop on Walworth road,

> and one near the post office site in camberwell

> (tho this could be the one from Walworth that has

> moved) Seemed reasonable to me.



I think the Walworth Road and Camberwell shops are in aid of Crisis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. Look how that's turning out - the squeezed middle or ALICE (Asset Limited Income Constrained Employed) voted Trump. We can't have it both ways. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...