Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wasn't trying to tar all bankers with the same brush and well aware that many of the shenanigans weren't against the law even if they were, to those outside looking in, a tad shady (moving money around is one thing, some of the gambling in the futures markets seems reckless and only concerned with making money for funds without any consideration of the real world implications). I was more referring that at the point where the banks were bailed out, there was a lot of talk about limiting bonuses until the banks had paid back the taxpayer and yet, the country is still making cuts while there are some large bonuses around even in those banks bailed out. Now, while again that's legal so there's not much we can do about it, it doesn't entirely feel right.


Still... it's an entirely different conversation to what the thread is about. Two wrongs don't make a right so just because there are perceived injustices out there, it doesn't mean we shouldn't throw the book at those who took part in last week's lootings.

OK, I'll play devils advocate here.


What we saw last week was the complete break down of law and order. People looting felt the law was beyond them - why else would they have brazenly broke into shops knowing that press and cctv cameras were focussed on them. This is the law trying to reassert its authority. Not only is the crime being taken into account, but the circumstances around the crime - i.e. if you were out there, then your crime is considered as part of the general violence.


There are going to be anomalies - the woman getting 5 months for receiving the looted shorts being one - but I hope the appeals process will right those wrongs.


I can see people's arguments, but I am really, really struggling to have any sympathy to any punishment dealt to anyone who had an involvement with the looting.

" And the Judiciary do take note of guidance on sentencing, so if you have a Government line that says 'we will get you and there will be no leniancy', then some Judges will interpret that to mean maximun sentencing and no bail. "


Sentencing guidelines are not issued by the govt.


"Except that how the judiciary are seeing it is that even those who 'just' looted opportunistically are responsible 'art and part' for the bigger situation"


Public order offences (affray, violent disorder etc.) explicitly make each individual responsible in law for all the consequences of the associated behaviour, and I can't see any reason not to extend the logic to the 'passing looter'.


There is no conspiracy. Sentences are not, as far as I can see, generally out of step with what you would expect for offences committed in the context of serious widespread disorder, even if there is the odd particularly harsh one. Linking it to MPs and/or bankers is just nonsense.

Someone posted this up on the Guardian comment site, which I thought was interesting:


"I'm not a lawyer but have had it explained by a lawyer and I understand this to be the case: in riots, anyone convicted gets an automatically higher sentence because, in addition to the crime they were convicted for, they have ridden on the back of someone else's violence. Basically, a looter uses the violent crowd as a weapon (intimidation, distraction, actual physical violence) the same way that a getaway driver gets charged the same as those armed robbers who actually waved the guns."

I agree in a way. I've seen how pub fighters with minor gripes and feed themselves into an unreasonable fury if only one 'reasonable' person mentions in passing that their gripe may be justified.


It's not the crim's sense of injustice that feeds this social rage, it's the general public's (albeit muted) justifications of it.


I'm not saying that this justification is unfair either - multiple political scandals over the last decade have led the general public to distance themselves from normal social acquiesence, and they have unwittingly unleashed this turmoil upon themselves.


Incidentally, I don't think the answer is acquiesence, but I'm staggered at the actions of the public at the ballot box. They voted for more of the same.

It doesn't surprise me at all that they did.


There is a massive conceptual disconnect between our occasional tick at the ballot box and the nature of our politics.


I think this disconnect widens exponentially the farther you get from the local to the central, hence we might think we have a huge say about the residents association, some sort of say in whterh the bin men or speed humps in our ward are prioritised, and I think that noone believes they have any say about westminster, harldy surprising when party machines make the grassroots feel like that, leave alone your average relatively apolitical voter.


I've mused over how we can change this in the past but had all my proposals pooh-poohed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
    • Meson Don Felipe on The Cut was my go to place for many years. Though it's now many years since I was there. 10-15 minute walk from the Tate. If you go can you tell me what it's like nowadays?
    • Doubt you would have got much change out of £150.00 for battery and certainly having forked out for it, best to use your car. I recently sold  my car via webuyanycar.com - very pleasant experience & was roughly what I was expecting. Pop your bangers reg jnto their website to get an idea of price - they do send e mails once a fortnight/month just as an aid for you. Easy enough to delete - don’t even have to read valuation. They literally buy any car - if you can’t get it to them, they will charge you to get it there or recommend a co that will do it for you. Must say, mine was a 2014 reg and whilst a bit suspicious, paid extra to get money into my account as needed it for next car but was assured funds had I not gone down route I took would be in my account within 5 days. I now live in the country - every time I have been back to Dulwich and surrounding area, normally get a fine for driving at wrong time or parking at  wrong time so if I drive now, park in West or East Dulwich and do everything else by public transport and walking.  Were I still to be living in ED then before I left was pondering this very issue but since I have been back regularly for health reason I no longer drive but take the train and then buses, walk or Uber. Much cheaper than running a car and had I stayed, that would have been the course I would have taken. I don’t go out everyday, have an allotment or job to go to or family so in my case, would be cheaper not to have a car.  Was truely shocked   at the cost of second hand cars…..but where I now live only has a smattering of buses so no choice but to have wheels to get from A to B etc.          
    • If you don't use the car often then suggest disconnect the battery between use by undoing the earth (negative / minus sign) cable from the battery and the battery will then last longer between use. Remember, central locking, alarm, clock, etc won't work with battery disconnected and wit ours I have to lock the doors with central locking before disconnecting battery as only have key on one door (leave bonnet open before locking doors). Hope this helps  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...