Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

????

????

Posted
Posted

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there a Bolton player on the ground for

> several minutes about 10 minutes after that

> incident, with Bolton in possession and they never

> once kicked it out of play? Seems a bit

> hypocritical of them to shout "unfair"


that maybe. But the fact that they should hsve had a freekick and Gallas off with a red rather thsn a goal against is mainly what they are moaning about. Can you imagine what Wegner would be saying?

Atila Reincarnate

Atila Reincarnate

Posted
Posted
The ref on the night was awful. Every decision seemed to go to Bolton. Over the course of a season refs make some shocking decisions last night was no exception.A team is under no obligation to kick the ball out when a man is down especially if the player down is one of the team in possession. We've been on the receiving end of some shocking tackles, Adebayors kick on Van Persies head for example. Bolton chose to play on and we won the ball and scored. Stop crying Coyle, 2 nil and you fcuked it up.
Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Nice of the Arsenal fans to cheer when Mark Davies was carried off after Gallas's horrendous tackle. That's really sporting of them don't you think? Cunts!


Spurs had a perfectly good goal disallowed and two possible penalty appeals turned down last night which for me changed the course of the game. I thought Howard Webb had a bit of a shocker and showed himself to be a homer. That's the way it goes sometimes.

Atila Reincarnate

Atila Reincarnate

Posted
Posted

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bad week for refs. What do you expect from Gooners

> Jah? I can imagine who was leading the chorus. :))


I thought you were determined to ignore me? I know you can,t bless you. Try not to let the green eyed monster take over your deluded thinking. Rags fans have cheered when opposition players have injured as have scum fans so it's a case of pot calling the kettle black. As if I give a shit about what Rags or a scum fan thinks. The holier than thou mantle is not one either of you can adopt with any credability. Rags losing against citeh, scum losing us winning, it doesn't get any better. Bring it on.

ruffers

ruffers

Posted
Posted

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So the FA will do

> nothing about the Gallas tackle. It shows they are

> consistent if nothing else. They did sod all about

> the leg breaker on Eduardo, so they've shown some

> sort of consistency.


It's a different situation, completely. The ref saw the Eduardo tackle and sent the guy off, action was taken therefore the FA can't act retrospectively. Gallas foul the referee didn't see it, and the rule is if that's the case then the FA can act. This is the bit I don't get.


So there's no consistency - in one case the rules were followed, the other not.

jimmy two times

jimmy two times

Posted
Posted
What irks me about the Gallas foul was the thought of how he reacted to the Eduardo injury. Wasn't that the game when he sat on the pitch afterwards and wouldn't come off? A fine example for a captain to set. You would think that he would try not to do to another player what he saw done to his teammate if it upset him so much.
ruffers

ruffers

Posted
Posted

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They can taunt each other as much as they like, G.

> Neville has achieved more in the English league

> than Tevez ever will. Ruffers, are you a Gooner?



Not sure how you came to that conclusion, City fan here. CTID.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Nigello
      Noticeboard on Northcross Road

      By Nigello · Posted

      The boards are for services provided by the council and/or non-profit groups or state agencies. Private micro businesses are to be congratulated and supported but they are able to advertise their services elsewhere, now more than ever, as part of their business plan. (This also applies to those who insist on plastering lampposts and bus shelters with their advertising, complete with protruding plastic ties at eye height!) 
    • alice
      Noticeboard on Northcross Road

      By alice · Posted

      ‘All and sundry’ is just another phrase for ‘the community’ isn’t it?
    • MattO
      Niko the Plumber.

      By MattO · Posted

      Another strong endorsement for Niko here. Super professional, did a great job fixing a pipe and bottle trap in our bathroom, with no fuss or drama. He's also a thoroughly nice fella, so deserves all the good words being said about him here. 100% recommended. Give him a call 07818 607583.  
    • Nigello
      Noticeboard on Northcross Road

      By Nigello · Posted

      They’re not there to be used by all and sundry for their private businesses (which earn money) — social media, postcards in shop windows, ads on the EDF and free newspapers are the right methods for that. I agree though that these notice boards should be kept in better nick and used as planned, namely to advertise council services etc. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...