Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just don't get Coyle's decision? I mean he may be getting offered more money and a bigger transfer kitty, but it can't be by that much. His reputation whilst at Burnley was very good and he looked like he could be going places. He's taken quite a big risk with this move.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My eldest son has a mate who is Jamie O'hara's

> cousin...

>

> Meanwhile my milkman's cat's uncle's

> brother-in-law reckons Man Utd are going to buy

> Messi in the transfer window.



What a card you are, did you stay up all night writing this, or was it written for you? Hilarious, give up your day job and become a script writer, you clearly have a huge talent for it.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Get off Bentley's back. I've seen many players who

> have revitalized their careers under different

> managers. Let's face it, he doesn't get many

> opportunities under Harry and when he does he

> can't afford to have any slip ups or else he'll

> get dropped. I though Harry was a master of man

> management and the arm round the shoulder. Seems

> it doesn't extend to Bentley. You ve soon forgot

> about the great goal he scored against Old Vinegar

> face's bunch of foreigners last season. Call

> yourself a Spurs fan.


Sorry, really can't let this one go. Bentley has been living off that goal against Arsenal ever since and it was way back in October of 2008. What's he done since then? Fack all!


Who would you take out of the current Spurs midfield to accomodate him? That's Lennon, Huddlestone, Palacious and Kranjcar who are all playing really well at the moment and deserve their place in the team that's also bearing in mind you've still got Modric and Jenas waiting in the wings trying to get in there too. And we've not conceded a goal in five games either.

I didn't say I'd take anyone out of the team to accomodate him. I simply pointed out that he's a good player. His main problem is he lacks motivation. You've just pointed out what a task he'd have to displace some of those players. He knows he'll never get the chance with Harry so I guess his attitude may be why bother. It's a shame as it's not like Huddlestone and Jenas have always pulled up trees over last two seasons yet they always know they'll get opportunities evern if they play badly. Enough Bentley bashing.

jimmy two times Wrote:


"He knows he'll never get the chance with Harry so I guess his attitude may be why bother."


*

*

*

*


Come on isn't that a very poor attitude to have. He should be busting a gut to get into the team. Unfortunately, he isn't. You know as well as I do no one has a divine right to play. You have to earn your place.


Anyway, I think we've got a really good chance of winning at Anfield this weekend. Come on you Spurs!

I agree that players should bust a gut and I also agree about Jamie O'Hara. I was sad to see Harry let him go on loan as he certainly always did a job for us in a number of positions. I just think that sometimes a player can get branded as arrogant or hard to handle and they find it difficult to rebuild their reputation no matter how hard they try. He really does not get many opportunities under Harry to put anything right. Anyway, enough about Bentley..I agree about the game at Anfield., weather permitting.

COME ON YOU LILYWHITES !!!

The news coming out of Angola regarding the attack on the Togolese team bus is shocking and saddening. The driver has been killed a couple of the players injured. How, and who made the decision to Angola. Will the African cup of nations be cancelled. Well ask yourself this, what happened after Israeli athletes were murdered at the 1972 Munich games, what happened after Heysel, & Hillsbrough, were the relevant events cancelled? For the love of Pete.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm surprised at how relaxed everyone appears to be about the works. They've been designed for: “capturing about 6 Olympic-sized swimming pools worth of surface water and releasing it very slowly” in the park.  This has been done at taxpayer expense, to mitigate an increased risk of houses flooding, caused in no small part by the failure of Thames Water to invest in a drainage and sewage system in dire need of upgrading / modernising, and unable to cope. Thames Water have paid out millions in bonuses and dividends since privatisation, run up huge debts, and are now on the brink of bankruptcy. Meanwhile we are paying for their under investment in the drainage and sewage system.  The park will likely be waterlogged more frequently and for longer.
    • I started a new topic and would love to see you all pop over to help me- I think some excellent ideas are here. I'm keen to get in touch with the lease owners.   
    • Hey all, Does anyone know how best to contact The Dulwich Estate or Stonegate? I'm a local entrepreneur with an idea for redeveloping the Derelict Grove Tavern.  Thanks,  Dean
    • If they have altered the state of at least part of Peckham Rye with their anti-flooding measures then perhaps they should alter the planting in that area to take account of the more marshy ground. I am sure that the horticulturalists in The Horniman Park (who do create different habitats) could advise - I assume for a price as consultants - for appropriate new planting to take account of any habitat changes. If it is to be water-logged for considerable periods then it's use as playing fields would need to be re-examined. Perhaps water polo? Actually this is quite a serious issue - I used to play sport in an area of water meadow where a boy drowned in the mud under a collapsed scrum.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...