Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe Red Devil can

> enlighten me on that one.


I read an article over the weekend that said Spurs hadn't beaten Utd in 21 PL games, 22 if you count todays game, so I make that 11 seasons ago, the scoreline was 3-1.

I remember very clearly Spurs' last win at OT as I went with a Spurs' supporting friend who was visiting Mcr.

We were standing in the corner of the Stretford End, yes it was that long ago, and despite telling him to keep schtum if Spurs scored, he let out a squeal of delight when Gary Lineker scored his only ever goal from outside the box...I like to think that lots of nervous throat clearing from yours truly prevented him from having his testicles 'surgically removed' and leaving OT with a permanent squeal.


Every team has a blip, I'm sure Spurs will come good and claim 3rd place, 4th place wouldn't be a disaster, just means a couple of extra preliminary CL games...

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even SAF said that talk of a manager leaving can

> be unsettling to a team. He experienced that. I

> suppose you know better though Parkdrive.



My experience is nowhere near as as in depth as yours seems to be professor.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even SAF said that talk of a manager leaving can

> be unsettling to a team. He experienced that. I

> suppose you know better though Parkdrive.



And the fact that the purple nosed one is infamous for his mind games, and that this might yet another example of same didn't occur to you no?

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh bugger! Thought Spurs played quite well today

> and then Man U get three chances and stick them

> all away. That's football. I can't remember the

> last time we beat Man Utd. Maybe Red Devil can

> enlighten me on that one. I knew we'd lose today

> by the way.

>

> PS: I've never ever ever seen an Arsenal player

> dive or cheat in anyway whatsoever. They are so

> honest those Gooners. They are beyond reproach.

> And Arsene Wenger's eyesight is the best in the

> world and he's never ever been known to winge.

> EVER!


For an hour you WERE the better team, but you did an Arsenal, played the better football and got beaten. Thanks for the compliment re our boys. For all of the EDFers that have taken to exception to my my dig at Bale and Suarez, can you honestly tell me you've not had similar digs at players that performed in the same way against your sides. Hypocritical, you lot? Never.

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

I hate to say it, especially as a supporter of a lower profile club myself, but the main reason one doesn't think 'diver' for Osman, or 'divers' for everton is because people don't really think about Osman or Everton.

Everton doesn't get scrutinised in the same way as Chelsea, Man U et al so it isn't talking point enough to get those dubious sobriquets.


We get things like plucky because we're underdogs. You may not like it but when most people hear 'everton' they think 'liverpool's second team'.

Sorry :-/

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate to say it, especially as a supporter of a

> lower profile club myself, but the main reason one

> doesn't think 'diver' for Osman, or 'divers' for

> everton is because people don't really think about

> Osman or Everton.

> Everton doesn't get scrutinised in the same way as

> Chelsea, Man U et al so it isn't talking point

> enough to get those dubious sobriquets.

>

> We get things like plucky because we're underdogs.

> You may not like it but when most people hear

> 'everton' they think 'liverpool's second team'.

> Sorry :-/



Absolutely spot on. I couldn't make that point because it would have been taken as a dig, but it's basically true.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pablogrande Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Viera dive

>

>

> Get a grip man, he hasn't kick a ball for us since

> he won the 2005 FA cup for us. Get up to date eh?


Yeah, get a grip pablo, don't you know only Parkdrive is allowed to cite ancient evidence...


Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > Not sure about fans of other clubs but I'd

> > rather

> > > none of our players took part in a futile,

> > > meaningless friendly in case of injury. Not

> the

> > > greatest idea to play such a game between

> > normal

> > > league games. Utterly pointless.

> >

> > Perhaps, tomorrow's game England - Holland game

> > was originally scheduled for last summer but

> was

> > postsponed because of the riots. Anyway PD

> nothing

> > to worry about. It's not as if Arsenal

> contribute

> > much to the England side in recent years.

>

>

> Really? Seaman, Dixon, Keown, Adams, Walcott,

> Wright, Wishere,how recent we talking? And as for

> Holland RVP? Perhaps give a definition of "recent"

> before making sweeping and ludicrous statements

> eh? Club v Country? The Arsenal every day of the

> week.

Atticus

Atticus

Posted
Posted

I whole-heartedly agree with you El Pibe regarding scrutiny. With the increased scrutiny for the higher profile cubs comes a counter-balance, they get more favourable decisions from referees. Thus, as fan of a lower profile club, I will lose no sleep over pointing the finger at serial cheats, Suarez for example.

> I hate to say it, especially as a supporter of a

> lower profile club myself, but the main reason one

> doesn't think 'diver' for Osman, or 'divers' for

> everton is because people don't really think about

> Osman or Everton.

> Everton doesn't get scrutinised in the same way as

> Chelsea, Man U et al so it isn't talking point

> enough to get those dubious sobriquets.

>

> We get things like plucky because we're underdogs.

> You may not like it but when most people hear

> 'everton' they think 'liverpool's second team'.

> Sorry :-/



Absolutely spot on. I couldn't make that point because it would have been taken as a dig, but it's basically true.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ''My Dad is bigger than your Dad, na na na na

> na

> > nah...''

>

>

> Oh the irony



Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Hypocritical, you lot? Never.


Indeed...

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Even SAF said that talk of a manager leaving

> can

> > be unsettling to a team. He experienced that. I

> > suppose you know better though Parkdrive.

>

>

> And the fact that the purple nosed one is infamous

> for his mind games, and that this might yet

> another example of same didn't occur to you no?


I'm sure your sentence is equally valid Parkdrive (as a sentence) without the 'no' at the end. It's content is another thing though.SAF spoke about this effect years ago when he witnessed it firsthand.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Dunno, but don't think it would necessarily be a bad thing. England can't lose, because they have no chance of winning really, so a caretaker coach can go with low expectation and see what happens.


By the way, why does the BBC website continue to give a platform for Terry Butcher to spout his out dated drivel?

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are we really heading for the euros with a

> temporary manager in place.......did I just hear

> right on the radio?


Pearcey is probably the only one with experience in getting an England team to the final. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jun/29/england-under-21s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Jenijenjen
      Section 20

      By Jenijenjen · Posted

      They are serving the section 20 on you as a leaseholder, bypassing your role as a joint freeholder. This needs to be addressed with them, if necessary via a solicitor's letter, that any works that need to be done have to be jointly agreed.  Also, whose lease does the front yard cover and what are the works that need to be carried out. For example, in my house the front yard is included in the lease of the ground floor flat and it is difficult to think of any works to the front yard that would fall within the responsibility of the freeholder.   
    • CPR Dave
      Baby-Friendly Screenings at East Dulwich Picturehouse – Too Restrictive?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      What kind of awful Mary Whitehouse worshipping sadsack would report this to the council ffs.  If you don't want ypur child to be in the cinema when there is an 18 movie on, just don't go.  There's no need to spoil everyone else's fun.
    • Dulwichlass
      Section 20

      By Dulwichlass · Posted

      The couple who I joint own the freehold tend to dictate on what work is needed. I usually just pay half but they usually decide the contractors to use. 
    • Sue
      Has anyone had food poisoning from icecream at a local cafe? (name removed)

      By Sue · Posted

      I am sorry to  continue this, but I found your previous  comment about me very personal,  disturbing and upsetting, which was why I responded at length. I'm sorry it bored you. I try to stick to facts. I have investigated. You (and anyone else) can go into the "search" settings on here and  do a search on an author's name. So you can (I presume) find all my posts, including any which were  replying  to you. I can't imagine that they are in greater numbers than my replies to anyone else, but you can see for yourself. I guess you can probably also find examples of what you call my "usual sarcasm". I wasn't aware that l had a tendency to sarcasm, though I do find a lot of things funny.  There is no need to reply to this unless you actually find evidence in support of what you said. Sorry everybody else. I had to get it off my chest as I was lying awake last night worrying about it 😭

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...