Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Birmingham 2 v 1 West Ham

Bolton 2 v 3 Man City

Burnley 1 v 1 Fulham

Chelsea 3 v 0 Everton

Hull 2 v 1 Blackburn

Man Utd 3 v 0 Aston Villa

Stoke 2 v 0 Wigan

Sunderland 2 v 0 Portsmouth

Tottenham 4 v 0 Wolverhampton

Liverpool 1 v 2 Arsenal


My first trip to Anfield this weekend - lets hope we win!

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks kpc kind of what the view on West Ham

> forums is...priority is to stay up and we need

> some cash for that so short term looks possible.

> May not happen anyway


Quids this is a link to the most reasonable BCFC message board.


West Ham, Gold & Sullivan

Using the bbc sport football predictor


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/predictor/default.stm



up to games ending 30th December


I have

Chelsea 49

Man Utd 47

Arsenal 41

Man city 38

Spurs 36

Liverpool 35


West ham 15th on 19 points


and at the bottom

Bolton 16

Wolves 14

Portsmouth 10


So the bottom 3 at Christmas go down off to the bookies I go


sorry if I have upset anyone but they are just my predictions and being an iron probably wrong.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Next Friday...some good teams finished as

> runners-up in their group so Utd and L'Arse could

> get a very tricky draw.

>

> Portsmouth have just denied they are going into

> Administration...Ratty, stop listening to gossip

> from your cleaner contact...;-)



Well, I did post straight after that Administration had been averted. Beginning to have suspicions about the person feeding me stuff and "cleaner" may not be far wrong. Lucklily I have a more reliable one who is definitely at the club, but who has been known to tell Storries now and again.


FWIW I think the club will go bust before the end of the season.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ted Max Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You'll have been more times than Keef, then.

>

>

> Oi! True since 2001 I'll grant you, but I used to

> be a regular. :(


More times than most Man U fans then. Mind you it is a trek from Hampshire to Salford!!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Daily Mash has got Liverpool covered.

>

> Liverpool turning the corner


Excellent read jah.

Think liverpool fans have to agree now that rafa has lost his way and it would be a good idea for the club to consider looking at a successor. Martin o neill or gus would sort things out pdq i reckon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...