Football Focus

[Annasfield]

Seems positive, but I won't hold my breath.

Liverpool FC Chairman Martin Broughton has spoken about why the Board believe that New England Sports Ventures are the perfect fit for LFC and why he's confident the sale decision could be completed by close of business next week.

In an exclusive interview with LFC TV, Broughton also thanked fans for their patience during the sales process and outlined the potential new owner's plans for the club.

Martin, it's been quite a dramatic 24 hours in terms of the sales process. Can you explain exactly what the situation is right now?

It certainly has been dramatic. The latest position is that we have a sale agreement in place, we've agreed the sale to New England Sports Ventures, that sale is subject to a number of conditions like Premier League approval and other normal conditions. The specific additional condition is that it's subject to confirmation that the Board acted validly in drawing up the sale documents.

Last night fans read a statement on the official website claiming that the owners had sought to remove Christian Purslow and Ian Ayre from the Board. What was the reasoning behind this and were the owners successful?

The court will ultimately decide whether the owners were successful. The reasoning behind it was that the owners felt we were reviewing two bids which they considered undervalued the club and therefore they wished to remove Christian and Ian and replace them with Mack Hicks, who is Tom's son, and Lori McCutcheon, who also works with him.

We don't think it was valid to do it. Essentially when I took the role they gave a couple of written undertakings to Royal Bank of Scotland. Those written undertakings included that I was the only person entitled to change the board and that was written into the articles of the covenants, and also that they would take no action to frustrate any reasonable sale. And I think they flagrantly abused both of those written undertakings.

You announced on Tuesday night that the club received two excellent offers. Why, in your opinion, is New England Sports Ventures the right new owner for Liverpool Football Club?

I think both of them would have been excellent new owners. New England have a lot of experience in developing, investing in and taking Boston Red Sox - as the closest parallel - from being a club with a wonderful history, a wonderful tradition that had lost the winning way, and bringing it back to being a winner. Their commitment to winning is what it's all about there and they've extended it from Boston Red Sox to Nascar and other things, but Red Sox is the main one.

I have been meeting them now for several weeks in Boston, in Liverpool, in London, and I feel they are totally committed to supporting and getting the winning mentality back into the team.

Is their winning mentality the thing which has impressed you most about them during this period?

Yes. Their commitment is to winning on the pitch and that helps you win off the pitch too. The two are mutually reinforcing.

Fans have already got lots of questions, with three of the main ones being:

a) Will the debt burden be removed completely?

To all intents and purposes, yes. All of the acquisition debt that was involved in the current owners acquisition will be removed completely. We'll still have what we call normal working capital debt and there's a facility there for the new stadium which will remain in place, but to all intents and purposes all the major debt that has been causing our problem has been paid off.

b) Have the proposed new owners committed to investing in the playing squad?

Yes. They don't want any hostages to fortune, very sensibly, so they're not going to make any comments about how much or anything like that. But this goes back to the winning mentality. I think the demonstration is: let's look at what they have done at Boston, what they said in Boston, what they have done in terms of investing in players - and I think you get a high degree of confidence of their willingness to do that.

c) Is there a commitment from them to progress the new stadium project?

Yes, there's definitely a commitment to invest in a stadium and we will finish up with a 60,000+ seater stadium. Where they haven't finalised their view is whether that should be the new stadium or whether there are still opportunities to build at Anfield itself. They have done both. The people involved have built the new stadium at Baltimore Orioles, for example, and at Fenway Park they looked at the two options and decided that actually redevelopment with all of the tradition was better than a new stadium. So they have done both, they are committed to looking at both very professionally and seeing which is the best option, but there will be stadium development.

Just to clarify, what needs to happen now for the sale to be finalised?

The key thing is the court case. We need to go to the court to get a declaratory judgement, which is for the court to declare that we did act validly in completing the sale agreement, and then the buyers can complete the sale. We have to get Premier League approval and I'm certain that's not going to be an issue. There are one or two minor things like that but the key issue is the court, which should meet I would think next week sometime. That is the most likely time, in short order.

Can the owners block the sale of LFC to New England Sports Ventures?

Well, we have to win the court case. So effectively yes, if they win the court case they can block the sale. But then we may have one or two other thoughts in mind as well.

Could the sale process be dragged through the courts for months before a resolution is reached?

No, I don't think so. We should get a declaratory judgement I would have thought probably by the end of next week, in short order. There is an appeal process but that is also very fast.

How confident are you that Liverpool Football Club will soon be officially under new ownership?

I am confident. I wouldn't have taken the Board through that process yesterday if I hadn't been confident. I wouldn't have exposed everybody to that risk if I hadn't been confident, but you can never be certain. These things are legal judgements. We have been properly advised and I am confident.

Looking back, how thorough has the process been to identify the best new owners for the Club and how pleased are you with the final outcome?

Ideally one would have had buyers who were not only the best buyers but also satisfied the owners. That's what we were looking for and we haven't managed to do that second piece of it. Has it been exhaustive? Absolutely. We have, first of all through BarCap, contacted every plausible buyer. The media coverage has meant that you would have to be living on Planet Zog not to know that Liverpool was for sale and so if you had any interest in it you had the opportunity. We've talked to lots of potential people. At the end of the day, with the deadline for debt repayment looming we had two bidders, both very viable bidders. I think they were competing, there was competitive tension there and I think that demonstrates that we have the market price.

Finally Martin, what is your message to the Liverpool fans?

Keep the faith. We said we would deliver the best buyers for the club and I think we have delivered exactly that. I know they've been frustrated by not getting a running commentary and I know a fan wants to know what's going on. I thank them for their patience because I do believe the only way you really get these things done is out of the media glare and it's difficult to do it out of the media glare, but we've found the right owners. I thank them for their patience, their support, keep the faith, this is going to work. They're with us.

[Mick Mac]

I can't read all that Anna.

What does it really mean to you (and me)?

Small sentences please.

[Emerson Crane]

Why is it that so called "successful" business men seem to lose grip of their nous when they become involved with football clubs. These guys have riches were are testament to their business acumen, but it seems to desert them when they become involved with sport. Why is that? Newcastle, Liverpool, and Man U proprietors are cases in point.

[mockney piers]

Plus it always seems to happen to PLCs. Short term gain for long term pain?

[Emerson Crane]

I know this subject has been done to death, so I'll leave it to professional footballer to sum up the whole aggressive tackling debate.

Managers must take responsibility for tackles - Murphy

Zamora faces missing much of the season after breaking his leg

Danny Murphy has urged managers to take responsibility for their players after what he termed a series of "ridiculous" and "brainless" tackles.

"They can say it's effective and they have got to win games," said the 33-year-old Fulham captain.

"But the fact is the managers are sending out their players so pumped up there are inevitably going to be problems [in games].

"Your manager dictates what your players do and how you behave."

On 11 September, Murphy's Fulham team-mate Bobby Zamora suffered a broken leg in a challenge by Wolves' Karl Henry, who was also fined two weeks' wages by his club following his tackle on Wigan's Jordi Gomez last Saturday.

Cottagers boss Mark Hughes criticised Stoke's Andy Wilkinson for a reckless tackle on Moussa Dembele in the Carling Cup.

And Newcastle's Hatem Ben Arfa will also miss most of the season after breaking his leg after a strong challenge from Nigel De Jong during Sunday's 2-1 defeat at Manchester City.

"Every ship has a captain and that's the manager who is in charge," added Murphy.

"You get managers who are sending their teams out to stop other teams playing, which is happening more and more - the Stokes, Blackburns, Wolves." (Suprise, Surprise)

Professional Footballers' Association chief executive Gordon Taylor has said that reckless tackles are endangering the careers of too many players and Murphy has stressed that there should be tougher sanctions for dangerous tackles - especially for repeat offenders.

Murphy continued: "The pace in which some players go into tackles now is ridiculous. There's no brains involved in the players who are doing that.

Well said Mr. Murphy, well said.

[Emerson Crane]

Birmingham midfielder Alexander Hleb says that moving to St Andrew's from Barcelona this summer was a backwards step and has criticised the team's long-ball style.

Full Story: Daily Star

I think he may be looking to move on already. He's only been there 2 minutes.

[????]

And he thought swapping Barcelona for Birmingham was going to be a forward step?

[Emerson Crane]

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And he thought swapping Barcelona for Birmingham

> was going to be a forward step?

Don't think he had a choice, still serves him right, should have stayed with the Arsenal, which he readily accepts himself. Burke!

[Emerson Crane]

Oh dear, Man U in a bit of financial bother.

http://blogs.bettor.com/Manchester-United-post-83-million-annual-loss-a32696

[kpc]

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And he thought swapping Barcelona for

> Birmingham

> > was going to be a forward step?

>

>

> Don't think he had a choice, still serves him

> right, should have stayed with the Arsenal, which

> he readily accepts himself. Burke!

Depends on whether he wants to play football* or sit on a bench watching football. He doesn't look fully fit at the moment - no surprise as he hasn't played much in the past two years - so maybe he should make this his priority.

As for criticising the current long-ball style, the fans are ahead of him on this - hence the booing at recent games. Much of our success last year was playing neat passing football and retaining possession (Ferguson more passes in PL than anyone else).

Still, I'm sure he'll pull his socks up, buckle down and show Arsenal a thing or two a week tomorrow.

* or at least watch the ball sail over his head aimlessly in the vague direction of Cameron Jerome.

[Emerson Crane]

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Still, I'm sure he'll pull his socks up, buckle

> down and show Arsenal a thing or two a week

> tomorrow.

>

> * or at least watch the ball sail over his head

> aimlessly in the vague direction of Cameron

> Jerome.

Regrettably he won't be welcomed at Ashburton Grove tomorrow as this is an "international break" week, therfore the Prem returns next week.

[kpc]

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kpc Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> ... and show Arsenal a thing or two a week

> > tomorrow.

> >

> Regrettably he won't be welcomed at Ashburton

> Grove tomorrow as this is an "international break"

> week, therfore the Prem returns next week.

Just as I said!

[Mick Mac]

I think the footie returns next saturday.

[Emerson Crane]

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > kpc Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > ... and show Arsenal a thing or two a week

> > > tomorrow.

> > >

>

> > Regrettably he won't be welcomed at Ashburton

> > Grove tomorrow as this is an "international

> break"

> > week, therfore the Prem returns next week.

>

> Just as I said!

My mistake.

[Emerson Crane]

Liverpool facing the possibility of a 9 point deduction?? Can't see it myself.

[Mick Mac]

oh dear. Ireland losing to the ruskies. Northern ireland playing italy in an exciting nights footie.

[kpc]

And to make it a bit more interesting, a fiver on a sevenfold. Up in four so far, level in two (c'mon Greece and Serbia) and one yet to kick off.

[ruffers]

Not been in here for a while but on the physical tackle thing, seems to me tackles are no more physical than they've been before it's just that football has more lightweight skilful tippy tappy players in it. So the question is why should the rest of the game have to adapt to them, rather than the other way round?

And the de Jong witch hunt is ridiculous. It wasn't a foul. No one appealed at the time. Very very few ex players think it was a foul. And as for Newcastle writing to the FA that seems unbelievable to me.

http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1344873_de_jong_furore_stinks

Re Liverpool and 'Arry makes a good point - if Benitez had spent the money provided better... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1318433/Harry-Redknapp-Hicks-Gilletts-crime-giving-Rafa-Benitez-150m-squander-costly-flops.html so who's fault is it really?

[Sharon_H]

Oh deary me. I give up. He bought Torres, Reina, Alonso and a couple of duds, who doesn't.

Roy is looking good isn't he?

[ruffers]

I'm trying to find the link but Hodgson's first dozen or so games at Fulham had only 2 or 3 wins, then it all came together. Liverpool will be OK under him, then better than OK.

And 'a couple'? Brilliant.

[Mick Mac]

Sharon_H Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh deary me. I give up. He bought Torres, Reina,

> Alonso and a couple of duds, who doesn't.

>

> Roy is looking good isn't he?

No - they are both sh1t :)

A few duds you say....

[Sharon_H]

Ok, maybe more than a few, he had to make do with what money he available to him. No one has ever bought crap have?

Notice though in the press it's all the owner's fault now Roy is here, but before it was Rafa's. Ha!

[Mick Mac]

Poor Roy, he does not know where he is. Noone could blame him. Its sad when people work after 65.

[Annasfield]

Whenever a Liverpool supporter provides you with evidence as to whats happening at the club and/or things that have happened under Rafa, you say you can't be arsed to read it or don't comment at all. Instead, your prefer to read Harry Redknapp's derogatory comments about our former manager (who he is incidentally has a match against in the coming weeks (mind games?)) which was written in the Sun.

Good stuff. I couldn't actually give a flying fuck what anyone thinks of LFC anymore. We're fighting for survival having been royally fucked over by Hicks and Gillett, yet Redknapp thinks they deserve sympathy. The word I'm thinking of begins with a C.

[Sharon_H]

Hello Anna! :))