Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just saw the promo for Chelski players being spattered and splattered in blue paint.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2304607/Chelseas-stars-splattered-blue-paint-adidas-kit-advert.html


JT remained true to his 'colours' after he was painted by immediately calling the photographer a "Pink Bastard!"

Part 2 of the Champions League QF's.

A reminder of the 'Half-time' scores...


AM 3 RC 2

JL 7 SC 3

MM 2 OT 5

LG 2 Mx 6


PM me your predictions and I'll post them once I've received them all...



Tuesday 9th April 2013


Bor Dortmund V Malaga

(agg 0-0)


Galatasaray V Real Madrid

(agg 0-3)



Wednesday 10th April 2013


Barcelona V Paris SG

(agg 2-2)


Juventus V Bayern Munich

(agg 0-2)

I'll take the James article with a pinch of salt.

For one the man is a complete knob. Err, actually that's more or less it, but it's obviosu he has a personal axe to grind.


Shaka Hislop wrote a similar article for the beeb saying he considered and still considers PDC to be his friend, though he could be difficult, supporting James' assertion that the man was spikey but countering his implication that he was universally disliked.


I guess, as usual, media storms will blow over once we have some real news to worry about, like you know, the decimation of the welfare state and selling off the NHS and petty stuff like that.


Ultimately he'll be judged on results, I'm sure he'll inject some fight into the team, but yesterday show's that probably won't be enough.

Aah, he's alright I guess, it's just every time I've seen him interviewed he's so self important and pompous it winds me up.


Doesn't necessarily make him wrong, but in this he definitely more or less begged the question with his opening statements.


I'm not some apologist for facism, but I think rather too much has been made of it. He's still a working class boy with a difficult background who found solace amidst dubious types whom he still has fond memories of and a sense of belonging, whilst having grown significantly as a human being.


We might as well be demanding explicit repudiation of things quids once held dear before all huffing and saying we shouldn't tolerate this sort of thing on the forum until he has done so, perhaps Tudor Touch will withdraw advertising revenue until such a time.


All very silly if you ask me, but not so very different.

Given who can actually OWN a club and what they get up to (allegedly), the leanings of a manager seem small beer in comparison


But the fact is a manager is high profile whilst owners get to be shadowy characters in the background. There are probably loads of managers with worse views than PdC but have the sense to keep schtum. Not sure who that makes better or worse but there it is


So ? a lot of heat and noise around the appointment. It?ll fade away. Fans seemed vocal in support yesterday (compared with Chelsea fans and Benitez) and if results go their way I doubt many people will care either way


Edited to add:


I do think his appointment will end badly however. What can work wonders in a lower league can wilt dramatically with a more moneyed and self-regarding group of players in the Premiership

I sspect short to medium term he will have a positive impact but as soon as the first sustained dip happens?

Week 28 results...


OT - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts


LG - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


Mx - 3 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 6 pts


DR - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

MM - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

PD - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

SC - Played a maxxi = 5 pts


?? - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts

AM - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts

JL - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts

RD - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts


RC - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts


EP - 1 Correct Result + 0 Correct Scores = 1 pt

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Week 28 results...

>

> OT - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts

>

>

> LG - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

>

> Mx - 3 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 6 pts

>

> DR - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

> MM - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

> PD - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

> SC - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

>

> ?? - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts

> AM - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts

> JL - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts

> RD - 1 Correct Result + 1 Correct Score = 4 pts

>

> RC - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts

>

> EP - 1 Correct Result + 0 Correct Scores = 1 pt


How did RC get 3 RD? You haven't given him Newcastle have you?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> How did RC get 3 RD? You haven't given him

> Newcastle have you?


Yes I have. 10 was obviously a typo, so he was either predicting a 2-1 or 2-0 result. So I have no problems giving him a point for correctly predicting a home win. There must have been about 3500+ predictions made since the game started, and in that time only 2 obvious typos. If I thought players were deliberately swinging it I would dismiss their prediction, but to me this was an honest mistake. In my mind there was no doubt he was predicting a home win.

Had the actual score been 2-1 or 2-0 there would've been some doubt, so I would still have only given him 1pt for a correct result, not 3pts for a correct result. Had it been an away win I wouldn't have given him 1pt for predicting an away win, because to me it was obvious he was predicting a home win. Had I seen the typo beforehand, I would've asked for clarfication, like I did with Otta recently...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would disagree that the tables outside the Blue Brick bothered nobody. They were not within the cafe's curtilage (one table was even placed on the other side of the road!) but on a narrow public footpath where pedestrians have a "public right of way". Added to that, some customers rearranged the tables so the footpath was blocked completely. 
    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...