Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Week 17 scores...


AM - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts

RC - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts


OT - 4 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 10 pts


JL - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

PD - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

SC - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


EP - Played a Maxxi = 5pts


?? - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

DR - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

MM - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

Mx - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

RD - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


LG - 0 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 0 pts



Note: If two teams are tied on the same number of points in the league, the team with the highest participation % will finish higher, eg JL & AM.


I will make a decision about the FA Cup competition and it's format this afternoon...

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

AM - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts

RC - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts


OT - 4 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 10 pts


JL - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

PD - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

SC - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


EP - Played a Maxxi = 5pts


?? - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

DR - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

MM - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

Mx - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

RD - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


LG - 0 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 0 pts



What this week shows perfectly, reading the right hand column, is that it is the correct results that mean everything. It's good fun though, am not complaining. (just didn't happen to get any correct scores this week :( )

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

The FA Cup Predictor Cup:


Ok, there wasn't a massive amount of feedback on what format it should take, but the majority consensus was that it should be kept separate from the League. So we will.

As some have indicated that they might not even participate, I think we need to be flexible. I'm therefore proposing an initial league which will eventually become a straight knock-out competition. It will depend on how many participate as to when this happens, hence the need for flexibility. The aim is to have the top 8 teams go into the knock-out stage at the QF stage of the FA Cup. I will draw teams out to play each other...Fluffy and Hardface, next door's cats, will act as independent assessors (Woodrot permitting). If turnout is below 8, the competition will be binned.

To encourage turnout I've picked out the 10 most 'interesting' ties, keeping with the spirit of the competition of potential cup shocks...yes I know, Arsenal to beat Swansea is a bit far fetched, but stranger things happen at sea.


So, here goes...


Brighton V Newcastle

Bolton V Sunderland

Crawley V Reading

Crystal Palace V Stoke

Luton V Wolves

Macclesfield V Cardiff

Peterborough V Norwich


Swansea V Arsenal

Mansfield V Liverpool


Cheltenham V Everton

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:


>

> Note: If two teams are tied on the same number of

> points in the league, the team with the highest

> participation % will finish higher, eg JL & AM.

>

Surely as the initial rule stated a minimum of 75% participation was required for it to count, then if two 'teams' are tied, the one with the lower number of entries has the better average and thus should finish higher?

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good work RD I think that's a great idea and will

> have a shot. I think you were wise to keep the

> Third Round bankers like West Ham at home out of

> the mix :)


It'll be a cracking atmosphere with a big away support, but I think you'll nick it...

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Not many home bankers there RD - or ARE there?


Brighton 1 V Newcastle 1

Bolton 1 V Sunderland 2

Crawley 0 V Reading 2

Crystal Palace 0 V Stoke 1

Luton 1 V Wolves 2

Macclesfield 0 V Cardiff 3

Peterborough 0 V Norwich 2


Swansea 2 V Arsenal 2

Mansfield 1 V Liverpool 4


Cheltenham 0 V Everton 3



@AM - the one with the lower participation %age has benefitted from more 'maxxi's which, as form has shown, are on the generous side at 5pts ea. so I think RD's right.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good work RD I think that's a great idea and

> will

> > have a shot. I think you were wise to keep the

> > Third Round bankers like West Ham at home out

> of

> > the mix :)

>

> It'll be a cracking atmosphere with a big away

> support, but I think you'll nick it...



Oh great - now you've really gone and nixed it - unless that was your intention in which case as you were B).

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

>

> >

> > Note: If two teams are tied on the same number

> of

> > points in the league, the team with the highest

> > participation % will finish higher, eg JL & AM.

> >

> Surely as the initial rule stated a minimum of 75%

> participation was required for it to count, then

> if two 'teams' are tied, the one with the lower

> number of entries has the better average and thus

> should finish higher?


Average scores can be misleading, I therefore think credit should be given to those who have participated more.

I was surprised that LadyGooner went for only 4 predictions last week, because unless she got a a correct score she was never going to beat a maxxi. So if she finished level with someone who had played more maxxi's, I think she deserves to finish higher on that basis alone...


ETA typo

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Oh great - now you've really gone and nixed it -

> unless that was your intention in which case as

> you were B).


I'm being serious, honest!

History says Fergie will rest a lot of players and play younger/inexperienced, whereas because of injuries and relative mid-table security, Big Sam can afford to go for it with a strong team...I'm happy to be proved wrong though ;-)

????

????

Posted
Posted
History says BFS don't hold much of a torch to this competition...the cynical bit in me thinks that he'd be ok if we go out to Utd, as that's excusable, and concentrate on mid-table safety. Will be a decent old school atmosphere as always tho and probably a decent game. 1-3 :(
Rhinestone Cowboy

Rhinestone Cowboy

Posted
Posted

First off many thanks again for sorting this out week in week out

and then what a cracking week I had lovely....


Brighton 1 V Newcastle 1

Bolton 1 V Sunderland 0

Crawley 0 V Reading 0

Crystal Palace 0 V Stoke 1

Luton 3 V Wolves 2

Macclesfield 0 V Cardiff 1

Peterborough 1 V Norwich 0


Swansea 1 V Arsenal 0


Mansfield 0 V Liverpool 2


Cheltenham 0 V Everton 2

Ladygooner

Ladygooner

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Congratulations to LadyGooner, our second winner

> of the Coup de Mis?re...

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=74315


Thank you so much - I am delighted to receive it!

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

My lungs of phlegm are draining, my pleurisy is easing; I might try this prediction thing again without the cloudy head I've 'enjoyed' the whole bloody christmas break.


Brighton 1 V Newcastle 1

Bolton 0 V Sunderland 2

Crawley 1 V Reading 4

Crystal Palace 1 V Stoke 1

Luton 2 V Wolves 1

Macclesfield 0 V Cardiff 1

Peterborough 0 V Norwich 3


Swansea 2 V Arsenal 1


Mansfield 2 V Liverpool 5


Cheltenham 0 V Everton 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Anyone else love Dulwich...

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      All the parents looking after their kids instead of skiving from their meaningless desk jobs might mean it's quieter on here. Still, at least it gives free rein to the bad-tempered, long-winded pensioners that begin their posts "having resided in Dulwich for a not inconsiderable number of decades, may I be so bold as to suggest..." 😉
    • Molly26
      Anyone else love Dulwich...

      By Molly26 · Posted

      I miss that cyclist chap that comments on everything 
    • EastDulwicher
      Sternhall Lane Surgery

      By EastDulwicher · Posted

      We have been patients at Sternhall Lane for years. Our experience has generally been incredibly positive with speedy responses and very helpful staff. We are generally fortunate to get a same day appointment should we really need one either at Sternhall Lane or at Tessa Jowell and any necessary referalls have been swift. 
    • mgdms
      Set of keys found in Peckham Rye

      By mgdms · Posted

      @Alice if left might have been stolen/taken by someone (peed on by a dog or fox), also there are some little things attached of - I assume - sentimental value. I hope the owner can claim them. Will leave a note indeed with info how to retrieve them, though not with a private phone number in a public space 😅 Maybe a friend of a friend will come across this post on EDF.  @embob97 They do have a ring, sorry. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...