Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm....Manchester Utd can get to the final

> without meeting either Arsenal, Barcelona or

> Inter? Sir Alex must be laughing!


I don't see why he should be laughing (a little smile maybe;-))...Man. U are more than capable of giving those teams a run for their money (in my most biased opinion).

It's a bit of a shame really that Inter and Barcelona are in the same half of the draw, surely it is time for UEFA to mess about with the CL one more time and seed teams from QF to Final (e.g. such as in Tennis). It's almost like a dead rubber now having a French team in the semi final whilst the only real semi final of interest is likely to be Barca v Inter.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saturday

> Arsenal 2 West Ham 2

> Aston Villa 2 Wolves 0

> Everton 2 Bolton 1

> Portsmouth 3 Hull City 0

> Stoke City 0 Tottenham 0

> Sunderland 1 Birmingham 1

> Wigan Athletic 1 Burnley 2

>

> Sunday

> Blackburn 3 Chelsea 2

> Fulham 0 Man City 2

> Man Utd 4 Liverpool 1


This wouldn't surprise me. And judging from Fergie's comments about Rafa today he has clearly bumped his head.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a bit of a shame really that Inter and

> Barcelona are in the same half of the draw, surely

> it is time for UEFA to mess about with the CL one

> more time and seed teams from QF to Final (e.g.

> such as in Tennis). It's almost like a dead rubber

> now having a French team in the semi final whilst

> the only real semi final of interest is likely to

> be Barca v Inter.


Disagree, I'd like to see all seeding, avoidance of country clashes etc removed. The magic of the Cup and all that!

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Saturday

> > Arsenal 2 West Ham 2

> > Aston Villa 2 Wolves 0

> > Everton 2 Bolton 1

> > Portsmouth 3 Hull City 0

> > Stoke City 0 Tottenham 0

> > Sunderland 1 Birmingham 1

> > Wigan Athletic 1 Burnley 2

> >

> > Sunday

> > Blackburn 3 Chelsea 2

> > Fulham 0 Man City 2

> > Man Utd 4 Liverpool 1

>

> This wouldn't surprise me. And judging from

> Fergie's comments about Rafa today he has clearly

> bumped his head.



I'm not going to the game Anna (LUHG and all that) but have read stories that Utd and 'pool fans might have some sort of joint protest about their respective American 'owners', personally can't see it happening but any news about this from the other end of the East Lancs Road?

SOS have been in discussions with the FSF about joint protests with several clubs, but never with just United and Liverpool. One comment about Munich or Hillsborough and there would be carnage.


We did a joint protest with Pompey the other night though, but it seemed to be missed in the press.Some pics here

We tend to get shouted down by some of our fans when we protest as they seem to be blinkered to our financial problems. I imagine that when Torres is sold to fund our debt they may well open their eyes.


That said SOS has only been around for a couple of years, so to have as many members as we do, we are doing quite well.

The only way United and Liverpool fans will march shoulder to shoulder is if the country is invaded by alien forces ;-)


Agree about Ferguson throwing his toys out of the pram. Yes Gerrard should have got a ban but the Ref dealt with it on the pitch (if wrongly) which means the FA cannot then act. I doubt any of the hacks who cover the press conference would have the bottle to mention that but there we are.


As for the game, Liverpool have built up enough confidence this week to give United a very good game Sunday even if they did play last night so may be a little tired. My only real concern as is usual with a trip to OT is who is the Ref...

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love you ladygooner.

> Even when you're prediciting west ham a decent

> beating you're nice enough to say we'll score

> twice. You MUST have a west ham soft spot in there

> somewhere :)


I have lots of soft spots Mr Mockney!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You say that this post should be considered as a complaint. I am afraid that it won't be. You need to write directly to the council and sign the communication with your own name.
    • More power to them. I very much hope they win and it would be fantastic if a precedent is set to stop exploitation of park land by councils. I would also like to see Gala moved to the Common.
    • I would disagree that the tables outside the Blue Brick bothered nobody. They were not within the cafe's curtilage (one table was even placed on the other side of the road!) but on a narrow public footpath where pedestrians have a "public right of way". Added to that, some customers rearranged the tables so the footpath was blocked completely. 
    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...