Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Call me picky but I think you mis represented him - he did not maim another player as your original post suggested.


Your most recent post is correct. Your original one is not. A lot of people believe Keane ended Haaland's career, but he did not, so I get annoyed if people continue to state it as if it is fact.

He certainly didn't help though did he?


Keane was a very talented player, that is undeniable. However, in my book, he was not a "great" player, because he was a thug.


I am with Atila on this, you can't put Viera in the same league as Keane when it comes to aggression. Viera was/is a hard player, Keane was a nasty player.

I know exactl where atila is coming from, but in the first place you eiher got it wrong about Haaland, which is a genuine mistake, but refused to acknowledge it. Or you knew to begin with and that's plain dsingenuous, so also understand MM's frustration. It is naughty and helps perpetuate these falsehoods.


It's like the climategate email. By using misfirection it undermines the message that Keane is a thug and a bit of a nasty piece of work, which is true.

Viera was just as nasty a piece of work I'm afraid Keef. And football history is littered with players who were great AND thuggish. I think your distinction doesn't hold up.


Fair enough, but I disagree with you.


There have been players who are were thuggish, some wore the red of Liverpool, but IMO, Keane was something else, just a nasty man, who probably would have been banged up for GBH or worse, had he not been a good footballer.


Now, wait for the tirade of abuse.


Not necessary SP, for someone who claims to "ignore" Atila, you seem to try and wind him up more than anyone else on here. Surely better to just genuinely ignore him if he riles you, and then if he is abusive, you'll have more of a leg to stand on if you want to complain.


Just my opinion of course.

Changing the subject then...


I still ahven't seen the Lampard pen from yesterday. The Beeb say that Upson won tha ball, is that a fiar assessment? I don't remember ever seeing a penalty having to be taken three times.


I'd agree that Upson won the ball, but fair play to Lampard keeping his nerve 3 times, that can't have been an easy thing to do!

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I won't descend to your level or be baited by your

> response, just tell me when Viera went out of his

> way to maim a player like Keane, and then have the

> neck to admit to it. Keane was nasty, end of.


Now you have changed your wording - but of course I agree and accept that Keane did intend to hurt Haaland and hurt him badly (but in fact did not end his career).


Its difficult to be that type of ball winning player and not have an element of thuggery about you - it used to be a tough business in the middle of the park (not so much now). Greame Souness or Steve McMahon would be Liverpool equivalents.


Viera was more stylish but I'd much rather have Keane in my team than Viera. Keane's performance for Man United in the 1999 Champions League semi final against Juventus is as good am all round midfield performance as you are ever likely to see. He had everything.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I don't remember ever

> seeing a penalty having to be taken three times.



Yakubu for Pompey Vs Norwich in the Prem in about 2004. Same goalie - ironically - Robert Green!


Yak scored all three too!


Oh - and Roy Keane is a coont! ;)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cmon Matt.....say something....


Record as Rangers Manager 2001?2006


Scottish Premier League winners (2): 2002?03, 2004?05

Scottish Cup winners (2): 2002, 2003

Scottish League Cup winners (3): 2002, 2003, 2005


Martin O'Neil


SPL Championship (3) ? 2000/01, 2001/02, 2003/04

Scottish Cup (3) ? 2001, 2004, 2005

Scottish League Cup (1) ? 2000/01


I make that a double and a treble for McCleish versus one double for Martin O'Neil. I quite like McCleish as unlike other ex-Fergie players he seems a genuine good guy.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I make that a double and a treble for McCleish

> versus one double for Martin O'Neil. I quite like

> McCleish as unlike other ex-Fergie players he

> seems a genuine good guy.


Matt - Domestic trophies don't really give the answer - noone in Scotland thought Rangers were a better team than Celtic during this period. Celtic were unbeaten at home in 3 years under oneill including in Champions League.

In 2003 for example Celtic beat many good teams incl. Liverpool in their UEFA cup run and lost 3-2 to Mourinhos Porto team in the final - they lost the league and cup to Rangers that year, but were streets ahead of Rangers - just did not have a big enough squad to compete on all fronts. Even McLeish would admit that his team that won the treble was well short of Celtic.


But having seen your statistics I am slightly surprised - I did not think McLeish won as much as he did.


O Neill won the league 3 times in his first 4 years and in the other year reached the uefa cup final allowing rangers to nip in and win the league on goal difference - it should really have been 4 in a row. Don't forget that Celtic were playing the top teams in europe mid week over this period.


Martin O'Neill oversaw a record SEVEN consecutive wins over Rangers home and away. McLeish could not handle him.


No contest.


As for your original statement of McLeish getting to a CL Quarter final - thats incorrect - only Celtic have gotten out of the group stages in recent history (under gordon strachan).

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It wasn't a penalty, but then they had a

> legitimate handball penalty shout turned down

> earlier, so I'm not going to get upset.

>

> Would love to have seen him sky the last one

> though, that would have been very funny.


Don't fret too long I am sure he will oblige at the World Cup >:D<

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mockney piers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It wasn't a penalty, but then they had a

> > legitimate handball penalty shout turned down

> > earlier, so I'm not going to get upset.

> >

> > Would love to have seen him sky the last one

> > though, that would have been very funny.

>

> Don't fret too long I am sure he will oblige at

> the World Cup >:D<


How true!!

Quoted for Matt


> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > I make that a double and a treble for McCleish

> > versus one double for Martin O'Neil. I quite

> like

> > McCleish as unlike other ex-Fergie players he

> > seems a genuine good guy.






> Matt - Domestic trophies don't really give the

> answer - noone in Scotland thought Rangers were a

> better team than Celtic during this period. Celtic

> were unbeaten at home in 3 years under oneill

> including in Champions League.

> In 2003 for example Celtic beat many good teams

> incl. Liverpool in their UEFA cup run and lost 3-2

> to Mourinhos Porto team in the final - they lost

> the league and cup to Rangers that year, but were

> streets ahead of Rangers - just did not have a big

> enough squad to compete on all fronts. Even

> McLeish would admit that his team that won the

> treble was well short of Celtic.

>

> But having seen your statistics I am slightly

> surprised - I did not think McLeish won as much as

> he did.

>

> O Neill won the league 3 times in his first 4

> years and in the other year reached the uefa cup

> final allowing rangers to nip in and win the

> league on goal difference - it should really have

> been 4 in a row. Don't forget that Celtic were

> playing the top teams in europe mid week over this

> period.

>

> Martin O'Neill oversaw a record SEVEN consecutive

> wins over Rangers home and away. McLeish could not

> handle him.

>

> No contest.

>

> As for your original statement of McLeish getting

> to a CL Quarter final - thats incorrect - only

> Celtic have gotten out of the group stages in

> recent history (under gordon strachan).

Actually Mick, Rangers reached the last 16 in 2006 going out on away goals rule to Villareal


I'm not an expert on Scottish football, and not even sure that McCleish was in charge at the time, but the best Scottish team I've seen in recent years for actual football played was the Rangers that had Arteta and Barry Ferguson in midfield. Think it was an Old Firm match and remember thinking Arteta is the kind of player who'd do well at Liverpool. Sorry Mick not really a fan of up 'em and at 'em kinda football.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...