Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there. We are about 2 weeks away from embarking on the exciting adventure that is weaning and will need to buy a high chair for our daughter. Any recommendations on what to look out for? I've seen a huge range in price, materials (e.g. wood, plastic, fabric) and functionality (swivel, tilt, travel). Many thanks, Heidi
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18984-high-chair-recommendation/
Share on other sites

Tripp Trapp chairs are brilliant. We started out with a Chicco highchair that had won all sorts of awards, and did just about everything (except make the baby eat!) and it was a nightmare - hard to keep clean, an absolutely monstrosity that took up half the kitchen etc.


Having switched to a Tripp Trapp when our son was about 15 months old, we then bought another one to use right from the start with our daughter, and they still use them now (4.5 and 3) - I imagine we'll still be using them for many years.

I went for a basic Antilop from IKEA. It's been a great buy - inexpensive, very easy to clean (we do baby-led weaning so needed something easy to wipe down), easy to transport and it's also the model used in quite a few restaurants and pubs so my son is already used to the chair when we take him out.

I, too, am confused by the huge range out there! I am tempted by the Tripp Trapp but my hubbie did raise an eyebrow when I mentioned the price!


Bonfire2010 - assuming that most tables are of a similar height, does the Antilop fit comfortably under the dining table?


What do people use once their child becomes too big for a standard high chair (i.e if you didn't get something like a Tripp Trapp that lasts for several years)? Sorry to hijack your thread, Heidi!

Another vote for the ikea antilop. That and the trip trap (opposite ends of the price spectrum!) seem to consistently get mentioned as the two best. What I love about the antilop is that it's soooo easy to clean, and you can whip the tray off and stick it in the dishwasher. it is portable but we have a booster seat we tend to take if going away, and we use that if we're all eating at the table (plastic mothercare one). My son is fairly average height 2.5 yrold and still comfortable in the antilop.

Tripp Trapp all the way (but then I am Scandinavian) :)


Worth the money....my 5 year old still sits on his!


I think they are fantastic! You can take of the baby attachements which allows your toddler (who no longer likes to be strapped in a high chair!!) to climb up and sit at the table by themselves rather than having to get them onto a chair where they can't reach their food ;)


I have loved it and thought it was money well spent.


Actually have a brand new one still in the box - never managed to give my little boy a sibling :( probably should just sell it actually...

Another vote for the Tripp Trapp - definitely don't regret spending the money, and will be buying a matching one for the other end of the table when baby number two comes along. I particularly like the way it obviously supports their posture, even from when they're first in it.
We have a Tripp Trapp at home and antilop at grandparents' houses for visits. We love the Tripp Trapp - Baby Knomester sits up at the right height at the table with us and it's great for his posture. I personally wouldn't want to use the antilop all of the time for long periods because it's not as good for posture.
Tripp trapp definitely. It really is an investment. My sister and I used them as kids and now our eldest children (5 and 3.5) are using the same ones more than 30 years later. We've both bought new ones for their younger siblings and they are identical as it is such a classic design.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...