Jump to content

Recommended Posts

edresi - I don't think Brendan was seriously engaging with those previous posts. For good reason.


Anyway, I have just heard news on the radio and apparently some council has decided to evict tenants as their son was convicted of taking part in the riots/looting. Don't know any more than that.

So when you stop immigrants coming in, presumably you will stop indigenous people leaving the country too? Fairs fair and all that


But oops.. That means more people to find jobs for again! Damn. Still, at least they will be British people right?' that's the main thing... Once we achieve that we can be satisfied?


Twats

There's definitely a gap in the available labour force and jobs.....and yes, opened ended immigration doesn't help that situation to improve. The result is of course competition for jobs and sadly too many people can not compete. The unemployment figures are disproportionate for those under 24 and those over 45-50. It is easy to say these people won't take jobs but that's not my experience of most of the unemployed I know in those groups. They want jobs, apprenticeships, something that gives them prospects. It's not true to say they are all too fussy either. The fact is that employers do employ prejudice because of age, experience, cost, time unemployed and so on.


Another problem that I think has impacted greatly on younger generations is the lack of manual skilled jobs. Everything today requires some level of academic qualification and not all youngsters are cut out for that. When we still had skilled manual jobs, made things etc, a kid could start an apprenticeship aged 14. He learned on the job and wasn't required to go to college and pass exams. He could work his way up into a good job in time and he could see that he could achieve that with time and hard work. A lot of the young people that are so called 'un-employable' fall into that catagory, and our economy has no answers for them.

Such an odd conversation, its like a little cabal of white pure born brits making sense to only themselves. No wonder the windows went in, as they just probed your lines, it will definitely be gooks in the wire next time.
Its not rocket science, its really simple. Some 'immigrants' take all the jobs, the others take all the benefits. What we want is British jobs for British people, any 'immigrant' rioters we can just revoke their citizenship,I mean,...er.... their immigrations status..... after all, dog stable etc etc etc...
I blame Europe. They can just walk in over the border and get a house and now the workplace smells of potcheen and baklava. Consequently an entire generation are only ever going to get to commit the type of theft that isn?t legitimised though institutional corruption or industry practices.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway, I have just heard news on the radio and

> apparently some council has decided to evict

> tenants as their son was convicted of taking part

> in the riots/looting. Don't know any more than

> that.


Will be interested to see what grounds they use for pursuing that, and if there is already a prior history of ASB. Can't see it succeeding if there are no previous ASB orders in place though.

Immigration is a red herring. What we need is a higher proportion of jobs to the available labour force than we have at the moment. And more importantly we need good jobs, that people might want to do for more than a few months.

"Immigration is a red herring. What we need is a higher proportion of jobs to the available labour force than we have at the moment. And more importantly we need good jobs, that people might want to do for"


This. Times 100


Oh and noodle hats? I'm not Brits bs, I'm an immigrant. And I'm calling you out as suspiciously familiar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...