Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is a petition on the HM Government website asking that any persons convicted of criminal acts during the current London riots should have all financial benefits removed. No tax payer should have to contribute to those who have destroyed property, stolen from their community and shown a disregard for the country that provides for them.


Here's the link in case anyone on the forum is interested in signing it: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/7337

Surely they should be given community order sentences and forced to make good the damage they've done? Might even learn a useful skill and become, shock horror, a useful member of society. Punishment should fit the crime.


Withdrawing benefits will, as Rosie and Jaybee point out, just make matters worse.

Community service sounds like an excellent idea - as long as the number of hours is up in the thousands.


We can't start preventing child criminals from receiving benefits in the future, the repercussions could be disastrous. But in answer to the question "how are they going to eat with no legal source of income"... one radical idea might be to get something called a "job", which can provide an income to cover essentials such as fried chicken, trainers, and xbox games. In order to prepare for this, they might want to consider occasionally attending something known as a "school".

Well there's that. But I'm talking in the immediate. Those who are already on benefits, how do they eat until such time as they've improved themselves? And how do you factor in for unemployment levels?


And as a matter of fact, what these kids (& adults) did, while awful, for the most part wasn't murder, rape, paedophilia. But we're ok with people convicted of those crimes getting benefits right?


This petition is idiotic. It's knee-jerk, and I don't mind that so much, I think we're all pretty fucking angry right now, but that's why I'm glad I don't get to pass sentence, because if I did I'd have them all in leg irons breaking rocks.

"Most of them looked very young, and I don't believe in writing individuals off."


And right there that's the problem - given whatever circumstances have got them to where they are (family? drugs? peers? whatever) are unlikely to change, it takes money and time to turn that around (youth centres, programmes etc) - all in the face of hostility ("you love those punks more than you love law-abiding citizens" etc) from the choir


I'm not making excuses for anyone - a plague on every participant in the riots - but riots like this weeks don't happen all the time for a bunch of reasons. And one of those reasons is that a small band of commited people recognise that many kids are broken 9for whatever reason) and try and grub around for funding to keep them busy. If it stops rioting, it's cheap at twice the price, even if it appears to be "soft"

Sure there is a lack of opportunity for these children, and this should be made available - but there is also a lack of responsibility; from the kids, from their parents, schools, and authority for failing to "civilise" them. Put simply in my view noone has ever said no to them in any meaningful way, but simply endulged them - this ultimately harms both the child and society. Billions have been pumped into inner cities, to what effect? Its time to review our approach to urban youth, sure make opportunity available, but take a much stricter approach to wrong doing and anti-social behaviour.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And how are they going to eat with no legal source

> of income?



Who gives a sh1t. How are the people who lost their businesses and homes going to eat?!


I also think their belongings should be sold at auction to pay for the damage. Like what the Criminal Assets Bureau do to drug barons in Ireland.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy, would you employ the little bastards?

>

> Chances of their getting a job are slim - whether

> by dint of their own fecklessness, criminal

> record, or unemployment. I'm not being bleeding

> heart about this, I'm being entirely pragmatic.



In some States in America they force you to take a job. I'm sure something like that could be implemented here. Something like street cleaning or government run factories making goods.

yay - several posts outlining the problem with the OP's petition and they come back with "Who gives a sh1t. "


wise....


(emotionally it's most of our gut reaction, I admit that. But you don't have to think for much longer to start to see the flaws) But it seems even 2 seconds more thought is beyond you

Can we take away their human rights...? After all this is what this is about. They riot, loot, burn and deprive innocent people of their basic human rights purely because they can. The police have no jurisdiction over what they do, their hands are tied by the plasticuffs of human rights. Having been involved in the judicial system for far too many years and been asked by rapists, paedophiles, murderers and generally the cream of England?s shyte to be given respect, all I could do was shake my head and walk away. Respect is earned, it is a perspective of how you feel about someone or something else not what you demand of others. There is no answer to this, no quick fix. The human rights act, the nanny nation and the, politically correct crazies have caused this. Human rights?????.. Who the hell for eh?

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yay - several posts outlining the problem with the

> OP's petition and they come back with "Who gives a

> sh1t. "

>

> wise....

>

> (emotionally it's most of our gut reaction, I

> admit that. But you don't have to think for much

> longer to start to see the flaws) But it seems

> even 2 seconds more thought is beyond you


Read what I just wrote about people who lost their homes and jobs. How are they going to eat?

Yep - repercussions should be meaningful and strong - that I agree with


I'm siding with the long community sentence thing, as well as the restoration of any groups which have recentlly had their funding cut to deal with people like this. primarily because it's more sucessful AND cheaper than employing more police and just hoping it doesn't happen again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • On what basis do you object to the economy spend numbers in the report and describe it as "extremely unlikely"? Is that objection based on data or is it vibes-based? Where does this estimate of "50-100 vehicles" come from? The objectors:supporters ratio doesn't speak volumes. Planning applications of this sort always receive objections from various curtain twitches and NIMBYs. It doesn't mean those objections are well-founded or sensible. The planning officers and councillors need to consider the issue objectively, not just count the letters. It's not a public vote. Saying the building is "out of character" is meaningless out of context. It's an unusual building on an unusual infill site. It's not supposed to be a model for future development across Dulwich as a whole.  We are in the middle of a housing crisis. London desperately needs more housing units. This is an opportunity to get a whole bunch of them on a small, unloved industrial site on top of a transit hub. Not building it because people like the Dulwich Society complains it's "visible" is crazy.
    • Not if someone wheels over it with a pram or a heavy footed person steps on it and it hasn't been tied up or is tied but explodes everywhere. Yuk! Agree we definitely need dog poo bins back again, particularly near Peckham Rye park, along Crystal Palace Road, and by Goose Green.
    • I would also like to thank James Barber for his full outline. Given what seem to be clear mistakes in interpretation of the plans by Southwark Council planning officers, there seems to have been a lack of due diligence. 
    • Many charity shops still take and sell CDs! Many people buy them! Locally, both the Mind shop and the Vision shop sell CDs. Possibly others who I've forgotten.  If memory serves, the Oxfam shop in Herne Hill does as well, though it sells them at a higher price than most charity shops. My partner is constantly looking through charity shop CDs, and delighted when he finds music he likes! Please don't bin them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...