Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And let us add, zero tolerance of 'high' level crime i.e. that committed by those who are continuing to 'loot' public money e.g. using taxpayers' bail out money to award themselves huge bonuses and gold-plate their pensions whilst saying that public sector is too profligate. The elite seem to think that everyone should accept their largesse is a divine right.

Magpie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Couple of points to touch on here - water cannons,

> rubber bullets etc are not authorised for use on

> mainland Britain


Not sure about water cannons. Baton rounds are used regularly by UK police, and would be entirely appropriate in a situation where a large mob is charging at police and throwing bricks/bottles.

First off, it is NOT entirely unreasonable to call in the Army. Unless things have changed since my days, they are trained in crowd control, and can be used as first defense working aloneside and under the command of the Police. Pure numbers of men themselves can have a calming effect.


Training for deployment to places like Iraq and Afghanistan nowadays includes crowd control elements, and training for deployment to NI contains loads.


@Twinkaloo - yep. I'll be alongside you.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Magpie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Couple of points to touch on here - water

> cannons,

> > rubber bullets etc are not authorised for use

> on

> > mainland Britain

>

> Not sure about water cannons. Baton rounds are

> used regularly by UK police, and would be entirely

> appropriate in a situation where a large mob is

> charging at police and throwing bricks/bottles.


Correct, baton rounds are available to the police in England, since 2001/2, I believe, and have been used operationally.

From the Guardian - a French point of view


"Globalisation engenders an excess of individualism and nowhere more so than in Anglo-Saxon countries," wrote Jean-Marc Creau on the site. Joelle Koenig added: "Since the Reagan and Thatcher years, deregulation has grown faster. They reduced taxes for billionaires ... and now they want to work the people of Tottenham and elsewhere to death to pay off the debt."


Jean Baptiste Clamence wrote: "There exists in England an underclass that does not exist anywhere else in Europe. White, little educated, without any means of social evolution, they are a perfect example of the results of Anglo-Saxon capitalism and its dehumanising program. The English perversion is to make this population proud of their misery and their ignorance. The situation is hopeless. I've more hope for the youth of our banlieues."

DinkyToy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> First off, it is NOT entirely unreasonable to call

> in the Army. Unless things have changed since my

> days, they are trained in crowd control, and can

> be used as first defense working aloneside and

> under the command of the Police. Pure numbers of

> men themselves can have a calming effect.

>

> Training for deployment to places like Iraq and

> Afghanistan nowadays includes crowd control

> elements, and training for deployment to NI

> contains loads.

>

> @Twinkaloo - yep. I'll be alongside you.


I left in 2006 and yes training in riot control is still practised.


However, soldiers on the streets is not the answer.

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God, The Guardian is spouting artcile after

> article of utter rubbish. These 'poor

> unfortunates' have had ?millions if not ?billions

> shoved at them over the decades.


Fuck me I was just transported back to South Africa in the 80s for a moment there.

"There exists in England an underclass that does not exist anywhere else in Europe. White, little educated, without any means of social evolution, they are a perfect example of the results of Anglo-Saxon capitalism and its dehumanising program. The English perversion is to make this population proud of their misery and their ignorance. The situation is hopeless. I've more hope for the youth of our banlieues."


has this bloke not been watching the TV?

Magpie, I see you didn't add Duggans' parents to your list. Turning up at a police station with a very large group of people was the core reason why this kicked off. Why didn't they just go alone? If it was my son I would be ashamed that he was even on a police wanted list.

Josiehendrick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot you are a Tory I presume? if you really

> think having Playstations and Blackberrys means

> people aren't poor you are quite frankly deluded.

> Britain is one of the most socially unequal

> societies and like countries like the US,

> experiences peasants revolts.


Sorry Josie, but you are trying to redefine the word 'poor'. Inequality is not the same as poverty and being poor.


Why do social commentators do that? Did they all sit down and decide that 'inequality' was not a strong enough concept and so they felt they had to hijack the word 'poverty'. Sudan has poverty. India has poverty.

Here's the real reason: Lib Dem MP Stephen Williams blogs about the reasons for the violence: "Everyone wants to be rich and famous, without wanting to work hard to reach those otherwise acceptable ambitions. So I think the prime motivators behind the looting are greed and jealousy, rather than sorrow and anger. Basic human failings that have been around forever. Not contemporary political gripes but certainly contemporary social malaise."

Short term


Magpie

>> 1) Immediate and robust police prescence to stamp out the rioting


Absolutely


>> 2) Zero tolerance of low level crime (by all)


I like the sound of that, its one of those things that always plays well to the gallery, the corollary of course being what do you do with them. Our prisons are already full, we can't afford lots more of them, and the culture responsible for the looting actually deems time inside as a badge of honour, so that ship has sailed.


>> 3) Investment in schools/training/etc with a focus on discipline, and it sounds glibs but also extra-curricular activities - sport and music keep teenagers focused.


Why glib? I quite agree, but there's years of effort to be done to erode a culture that belittles education and believes there are no prospects anyway. This is spot on, but its for the long haul and must be a genuine policy of real investment, not papering over the cracks or appearing to be fulfil a manifesto promise whilst spending the least amount possible to do so.


>> 4) Benefit overhaul - need to break benefit dependency culture


And we've heard this time after time for 30 years too and I'm still not sure what it's supposed to mean. In practice it means tinkering with the system at little gain but often high cost, doing nothing to decrease dependence but making damn sure there is little dignity left in anyone stick in the situation.

I suspect what you mean is wholesale benefit removal, this will certainly break dependence. Hell it may just break the gordian knot, but I doubt it. Noones found an answer to this, I'd be interested to hear if you have suggestions rather than repeating an electoral soundbite.


BUt hell, at least you're suggesting things Magpie, better than sherwick's knee-jerk tedium.

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> From the Guardian - a French point of view

>

> "Globalisation engenders an excess of

> individualism and nowhere more so than in

> Anglo-Saxon countries," wrote Jean-Marc Creau on

> the site. Joelle Koenig added: "Since the Reagan

> and Thatcher years, deregulation has grown faster.

> They reduced taxes for billionaires ... and now

> they want to work the people of Tottenham and

> elsewhere to death to pay off the debt."

>

> Jean Baptiste Clamence wrote: "There exists in

> England an underclass that does not exist anywhere

> else in Europe. White, little educated, without

> any means of social evolution, they are a perfect

> example of the results of Anglo-Saxon capitalism

> and its dehumanising program. The English

> perversion is to make this population proud of

> their misery and their ignorance. The situation is

> hopeless. I've more hope for the youth of our

> banlieues."


Errm, clearly doesn't know what's been happening in France's ghettoes recently, then - riots aplenty. Ah yes, I see - he's only interested in the whites. How quaintly French...

'Here's the real reason: Lib Dem MP Stephen Williams blogs about the reasons for the violence: "Everyone wants to be rich and famous, without wanting to work hard to reach those otherwise acceptable ambitions'


so it's the X factor's fault then. haha. Simon will be pleased.

Magpie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On the rich - how about revitalising the victorian

> culture of philanthropy - where are the Horniman's

> of today? ;-)


Philanthropy happened in a world of very low taxation. Yes, I know the rich avoid much of their tax these days, but 150 years ago only a small minority of the population paid tax, and then only at a rate of less than 10%.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Dulwich Gails
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...