Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And let us add, zero tolerance of 'high' level crime i.e. that committed by those who are continuing to 'loot' public money e.g. using taxpayers' bail out money to award themselves huge bonuses and gold-plate their pensions whilst saying that public sector is too profligate. The elite seem to think that everyone should accept their largesse is a divine right.

Magpie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Couple of points to touch on here - water cannons,

> rubber bullets etc are not authorised for use on

> mainland Britain


Not sure about water cannons. Baton rounds are used regularly by UK police, and would be entirely appropriate in a situation where a large mob is charging at police and throwing bricks/bottles.

First off, it is NOT entirely unreasonable to call in the Army. Unless things have changed since my days, they are trained in crowd control, and can be used as first defense working aloneside and under the command of the Police. Pure numbers of men themselves can have a calming effect.


Training for deployment to places like Iraq and Afghanistan nowadays includes crowd control elements, and training for deployment to NI contains loads.


@Twinkaloo - yep. I'll be alongside you.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Magpie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Couple of points to touch on here - water

> cannons,

> > rubber bullets etc are not authorised for use

> on

> > mainland Britain

>

> Not sure about water cannons. Baton rounds are

> used regularly by UK police, and would be entirely

> appropriate in a situation where a large mob is

> charging at police and throwing bricks/bottles.


Correct, baton rounds are available to the police in England, since 2001/2, I believe, and have been used operationally.

From the Guardian - a French point of view


"Globalisation engenders an excess of individualism and nowhere more so than in Anglo-Saxon countries," wrote Jean-Marc Creau on the site. Joelle Koenig added: "Since the Reagan and Thatcher years, deregulation has grown faster. They reduced taxes for billionaires ... and now they want to work the people of Tottenham and elsewhere to death to pay off the debt."


Jean Baptiste Clamence wrote: "There exists in England an underclass that does not exist anywhere else in Europe. White, little educated, without any means of social evolution, they are a perfect example of the results of Anglo-Saxon capitalism and its dehumanising program. The English perversion is to make this population proud of their misery and their ignorance. The situation is hopeless. I've more hope for the youth of our banlieues."

DinkyToy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> First off, it is NOT entirely unreasonable to call

> in the Army. Unless things have changed since my

> days, they are trained in crowd control, and can

> be used as first defense working aloneside and

> under the command of the Police. Pure numbers of

> men themselves can have a calming effect.

>

> Training for deployment to places like Iraq and

> Afghanistan nowadays includes crowd control

> elements, and training for deployment to NI

> contains loads.

>

> @Twinkaloo - yep. I'll be alongside you.


I left in 2006 and yes training in riot control is still practised.


However, soldiers on the streets is not the answer.

Sherwick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God, The Guardian is spouting artcile after

> article of utter rubbish. These 'poor

> unfortunates' have had ?millions if not ?billions

> shoved at them over the decades.


Fuck me I was just transported back to South Africa in the 80s for a moment there.

"There exists in England an underclass that does not exist anywhere else in Europe. White, little educated, without any means of social evolution, they are a perfect example of the results of Anglo-Saxon capitalism and its dehumanising program. The English perversion is to make this population proud of their misery and their ignorance. The situation is hopeless. I've more hope for the youth of our banlieues."


has this bloke not been watching the TV?

Magpie, I see you didn't add Duggans' parents to your list. Turning up at a police station with a very large group of people was the core reason why this kicked off. Why didn't they just go alone? If it was my son I would be ashamed that he was even on a police wanted list.

Josiehendrick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot you are a Tory I presume? if you really

> think having Playstations and Blackberrys means

> people aren't poor you are quite frankly deluded.

> Britain is one of the most socially unequal

> societies and like countries like the US,

> experiences peasants revolts.


Sorry Josie, but you are trying to redefine the word 'poor'. Inequality is not the same as poverty and being poor.


Why do social commentators do that? Did they all sit down and decide that 'inequality' was not a strong enough concept and so they felt they had to hijack the word 'poverty'. Sudan has poverty. India has poverty.

Here's the real reason: Lib Dem MP Stephen Williams blogs about the reasons for the violence: "Everyone wants to be rich and famous, without wanting to work hard to reach those otherwise acceptable ambitions. So I think the prime motivators behind the looting are greed and jealousy, rather than sorrow and anger. Basic human failings that have been around forever. Not contemporary political gripes but certainly contemporary social malaise."

Short term


Magpie

>> 1) Immediate and robust police prescence to stamp out the rioting


Absolutely


>> 2) Zero tolerance of low level crime (by all)


I like the sound of that, its one of those things that always plays well to the gallery, the corollary of course being what do you do with them. Our prisons are already full, we can't afford lots more of them, and the culture responsible for the looting actually deems time inside as a badge of honour, so that ship has sailed.


>> 3) Investment in schools/training/etc with a focus on discipline, and it sounds glibs but also extra-curricular activities - sport and music keep teenagers focused.


Why glib? I quite agree, but there's years of effort to be done to erode a culture that belittles education and believes there are no prospects anyway. This is spot on, but its for the long haul and must be a genuine policy of real investment, not papering over the cracks or appearing to be fulfil a manifesto promise whilst spending the least amount possible to do so.


>> 4) Benefit overhaul - need to break benefit dependency culture


And we've heard this time after time for 30 years too and I'm still not sure what it's supposed to mean. In practice it means tinkering with the system at little gain but often high cost, doing nothing to decrease dependence but making damn sure there is little dignity left in anyone stick in the situation.

I suspect what you mean is wholesale benefit removal, this will certainly break dependence. Hell it may just break the gordian knot, but I doubt it. Noones found an answer to this, I'd be interested to hear if you have suggestions rather than repeating an electoral soundbite.


BUt hell, at least you're suggesting things Magpie, better than sherwick's knee-jerk tedium.

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> From the Guardian - a French point of view

>

> "Globalisation engenders an excess of

> individualism and nowhere more so than in

> Anglo-Saxon countries," wrote Jean-Marc Creau on

> the site. Joelle Koenig added: "Since the Reagan

> and Thatcher years, deregulation has grown faster.

> They reduced taxes for billionaires ... and now

> they want to work the people of Tottenham and

> elsewhere to death to pay off the debt."

>

> Jean Baptiste Clamence wrote: "There exists in

> England an underclass that does not exist anywhere

> else in Europe. White, little educated, without

> any means of social evolution, they are a perfect

> example of the results of Anglo-Saxon capitalism

> and its dehumanising program. The English

> perversion is to make this population proud of

> their misery and their ignorance. The situation is

> hopeless. I've more hope for the youth of our

> banlieues."


Errm, clearly doesn't know what's been happening in France's ghettoes recently, then - riots aplenty. Ah yes, I see - he's only interested in the whites. How quaintly French...

'Here's the real reason: Lib Dem MP Stephen Williams blogs about the reasons for the violence: "Everyone wants to be rich and famous, without wanting to work hard to reach those otherwise acceptable ambitions'


so it's the X factor's fault then. haha. Simon will be pleased.

Magpie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On the rich - how about revitalising the victorian

> culture of philanthropy - where are the Horniman's

> of today? ;-)


Philanthropy happened in a world of very low taxation. Yes, I know the rich avoid much of their tax these days, but 150 years ago only a small minority of the population paid tax, and then only at a rate of less than 10%.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...