Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was talking about this


"What was very marked was the number of medals worn by people much younger than I am. It was a measure of the numer of wars and conflicts that our servicemen and women have been involved in over the last 15 years - and in contrast to similar parades in the 70's and 80's when only retired WWI, WWII & Korean War vererans had medals."


and wondered if he thought it was a good thing to see more young war veterans? I find the whole thing a bit difficult because I hate the idea of people dying or putting their lives on the line for a corrupt government, but feel that the lack of support they get after they have done what they thought was the right thing, is a scandal.


I'm not a pascifist, but don't beleive our sons and daughters should be fighting to protect the profits of the multi-nationals who control world politics.

I always wear a red poppy - and don't feel it any way condones war. I feel it represents the absolute waste of life and all the potential of those who die in fighting wars. I can't think of anyone who believes the first WW was a good thing. The second WW always gets more tricky as there was a very clear wrong doer, however I feel very aggreived at the loss of life at the moment with Irag and Afganistan. I am not from a military family (altho my dad was on the wrong side in WW2) but so feel for all these young people thrust into such a contentious 'conflict' at the moment. I remember my dad talking about trying to find the bits of his mates after particular battles and just cannot imagine what the hell it must have been like. He survived and went on to have a normal family life. Pity the poor souls who didn't and think of it still happening now - and as Chav quite rightly says, the complete lack of support they get if they do return.

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was talking about this

>

> "What was very marked was the number of medals

> worn by people much younger than I am. It was a

> measure of the numer of wars and conflicts that

> our servicemen and women have been involved in

> over the last 15 years - and in contrast to

> similar parades in the 70's and 80's when only

> retired WWI, WWII & Korean War vererans had

> medals."

>

> and wondered if he thought it was a good thing to

> see more young war veterans?


CWLD - I retired from the Royal Navy in '92. I took part in the "Cold War". I worry that so many younger people are earning medals - it is not good. We have had two world wars in the last century, both (and certainly WWII) arguably fought on behalf of right. From Korea to the Falklands there was, broadly, a peace of a kind. Since 1997 there have been too many wars fought for uncertain aims, with a lack of forethought and certainly a complete lack of proper funding & equipment - all resulting in too many unnnecessary deaths. I am far less certain about the recent wars that this government has committed troops to.


I also agree entirely we should be supporting our service people properly when they return to UK. See an earlier thread Honour the Covenant

this has prompted me to consider where are the war poets of this fledgling century ?


my father fought in italy and africa and he was shot in the head in 1944 ,he survived with a brutal treppaning and ill health he died when i was 7 too young to hear about the war first hand my mother says he never discussed it like so many who witnessed horror


i have his medals

i read all of the posts above with interest and like the subject of the holocaust i believe we must never forget

and we must educate our children in this regard also

a fine book to put you off war is 'trench warfare 1914 -1918' by tony ashworth and ' the mammoth book of war diaries and letters can only scratch the surface of the the human loss {edited by jon e lewis }

im a newcomer to the edf and i feel ive put my foot in it already .........sorry that was not my intention

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...