Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think that although we lost on Camberwell Grove the council was a bit taken aback that 20% wanted it kept shut. The tumult caused by those who want it open drowns out everyone else.


And so, the council is committed to an area wide traffic plan -- to calm all the roads at once without just pushing the traffic from one to another. I'm sure a lot of people will hate that too but it seems a sensible place to start -- in fact it seems a sensible place to have started some time ago.

Sally - The problem is that ?calming? just makes traffic slower, noisier (tracks banging over speed bumps and reving between them) and more polluting. I?m sure it makes it a tiny bit safer for cyclists and pedestrians but makes it worse for residents subject to the noise and pollution.


Unless there are road closures or access restrictions then the rat running will continue.

yes, I completely agree. This is the point to emphasise to the council. When I say "calming" I am being vague. I certainly prefer road closures (filtered permeability). One neat road closure can avoid miles of humps. Local access only produces far less, far better tempered traffic.

Peckham is already hard enough to navigate with the ridiculous one way system. That's why we get trucks and coaches down residential streets, sometimes desperately trying to pull off a thirteen-point turn.


Closing off a road might make YOUR street quieter, but it's hardly going to help the bigger picture.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckham is already hard enough to navigate with

> the ridiculous one way system. That's why we get

> trucks and coaches down residential streets,

> sometimes desperately trying to pull off a

> thirteen-point turn.



I suspect it's got much more to do with coaches and trucks using consumer apps rather than HGV approved sat-navs and relying on them to navigate. Anyway my suggestion would be to have an area wide set of restrictions that ensured traffic stuck either to Champion Hill in the West or Copeland/Consort Road in the East, rather than using Lyndhurst, Bellenden, Maxted, Nutbrook and Adys as a rat-run. I understand that if there was just one restriction then traffic would just shift over (as it did with Ogglander, Ondine and Copplestone) hence why a joined up approach is needed.

The mayor's healthy streets initiative could be the way forward


https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/health/transport-and-health/healthy-streets-london


TfL has money for liveable neighbourhoods https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/boroughs/liveable-neighbourhoods


Southwark didn't get any of the first round of funding because its proposal was so inadequate.


The elections are coming so now is the time to raise this with your candidates

Sally Eva Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This has been pointed out before and the council

> has promised a traffic-review which will

> specifically cover a wider area.


Yep, a wider traffic review is what is needed. I have no problem with road closures as part of a coherent strategy, but the problem with proposals such as Camberwell Grove and Melbourne Grove is that they were not that at all.

Given there are about 5 different schools on this so-called rat run I would guess that is the major factor.


Unfortunately it seems to be encouraging bicyclists even more than usual to run the red lights and turn right illegally at the adys / crystal palace / east dulwich road crossroads.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you not think that the Easter hols has

> something to do with the relative quiet on the

> roads at the moment? Parking on Adys is easypeasy

> at the moment.


That suggests that the 'problem' is largely down to those working in the schools. What will they do when a CPZ comes in?

I would guess that as well as those working in the schools, a number of parents of school children drive to school drop their kids off and then walk to the station. Also there maybe a number of local residents who normally park here who have gone away for school holidays in their cars.


Those affected by a CPZ will have to park outside someone else's house during the window it operates in. More of a problem for commuters than staff, I would think, unless its an all day CPZ .

  • 2 weeks later...

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would guess that as well as those working in the

> schools, a number of parents of school children

> drive to school drop their kids off and then walk

> to the station. Also there maybe a number of local

> residents who normally park here who have gone

> away for school holidays in their cars.

>

> Those affected by a CPZ will have to park outside

> someone else's house during the window it operates

> in. More of a problem for commuters than staff, I

> would think, unless its an all day CPZ .


So School staff will have 'to park outside someone else's house'? Nice.


Why would a CPZ only effect commuters exactly?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think the catchments are that big.


Yeah, but some people move house after the kids have started at the school.


And St Johns & St Clements has no catchment area (i.e. it is undersubscribed)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. Look how that's turning out - the squeezed middle or ALICE (Asset Limited Income Constrained Employed) voted Trump. We can't have it both ways. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...