Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm working in an accounts dept. in a family owned business. I don't have a permanent position though. While covering for a colleague who was on paternity leave I discovered proof with 99.99% certainty that he has stolen cash from the company. What I found may just be the thin end of the wedge. The guy also has a very strong motive as he is helping to support a partner who is the mother of his child but who lives several hours out of London. The MD appears to think the sun shines out of his bottom.


I'm probably leaving this place in a month.Should I report what I know?

I don't think you've got any choice but to highlight it.


I would be very wary of accusing anyone - but I would feel quite happy in asking for someone's help in trying to help you resolve an inconsistency in the acccounts.


This isn't just an issue of right or wrong, but also self-preservation. If someone can embezzle funds, they'll also be prepared to let someone else carry the can for it: what better target than the temp?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm working in an accounts dept. in a family owned

> business. I don't have a permanent position

> though. While covering for a colleague who was on

> paternity leave I discovered proof with 99.99%

> certainty that he has stolen cash from the

> company. What I found may just be the thin end of

> the wedge. The guy also has a very strong motive

> as he is helping to support a partner who is the

> mother of his child but who lives several hours

> out of London. The MD appears to think the sun

> shines out of his bottom.

>

> I'm probably leaving this place in a month.Should

> I report what I know?



Yes without f-in doubt.


It's theft & it could one day cripple the owners business.


Don't expect a pat on the back though



BUT it is the right thing to do.



NETTE(6)

Speaking from experience I wouldnt. Families can be a bit weird.If it is a family run business and they are related and the boss thinks the sun shines out of his backside,he may know about it and even be in on it. Families may stick together and it may backfire on you so Id say keep out of it, as an outsider it has nothing to do with you.

SpaghettiSue40 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Karter he could but it might be a case of shoot

> the messenger and they could make life hard for

> him until he leaves. This happened to me some

> years ago and it wasnt worth the stress.


That's why i say point out the discrepancy, not grass the person up and explain motive. Capisci Spaghetti?

I'd definitely raise it but stick to the financial facts. The books don't balance, explain why and let them ask who is responsible. You can present a view on that but then it's up to the owner to decide if they believe you and how they want to handle it. They employ you to manage their accounts, so I think part of that responsibility is to inform them of theft or fraud. You don't want to find them subjected to an audit down the line and for it to find that you never informed them at the time.


I had a similar experience when I took over at my TA. I did an audit of the accounts (because I could see something was wrong just from the annual financial statements). I put together a report and immediately took it to the people who needed to know. It was absolutely the right thing to do but of course those that were implicated have an absolute hatred for what I did (but who cares about them).

Ah right.


Well I reckon that if you're working in the accounts department, it's pretty safe to say that he has responsibility for accounts rather than swimming pools - and that includes never knowingly letting an erroneus set of accounts pass his desk unaddressed.


Could see him in trouble.


Cross-post

Alan, I would get all your concerns down in writing as clearly as possible and let the boss know as soon as you can. What they do with that information is up to them, but at least you will have discharged your duty and covered your back.


I had an ex-colleague try to pass off a pretty serious mistake and large overcharge she had made onto me in a place I worked in the past. Luckily I had written my concerns about her actions in an email to my boss before she tried to blame it on me and the client involved confirmed it was her not me, but it could have been very messy.


You have no choice but to make sure you don't leave yourself open to criminal or professional charges by someone who may be desperate to push the blame onto someone else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I spoke at the council meeting last night to object. 400 people objected to the development. I, and I suspect everyone else, is not against development, BUT the size of this too BIG to accept. The council is held hostage by the developer who is promising 53 affordable homes. And in return they get to build 360 bedrooms for students. The original plan was all student accommodation. 8 stories is completely out of sync. It’s sets a precedent for future development. They have been taking to the council since 2022.  What did not help our cause whatsoever was Counsellors McAsh and Mwangangye speaking as ward counsellors at the meeting. As the Chair of the committee said, it’s not often ward counsellors attend such meetings. The counsellors will say they didn’t speak for or against the development. However, they did speak up for the benefits of the site bringing more affordable housing to the borough. They asked for a window to have frosted glass to protect privacy. They asked for residents to be consulted during the building phase. So let’s be really clear, they did not say anything about the “optimisation” of the site. They did not ask for the site to be scaled down. Now I know why James would not be drawn into discussing the development before now….   Make no mistake, this development is optimised for profit and the trade off is the developer profits at scale and the council have 53 affordable homes. The Southwark Plan says they should respect the character of East Dulwich. How can an 8 story building be ever respectful to the character of East Dulwich. It’s a hugely imposing building.  Unless we stand up together as a community, then we shall be stuck with it, although I suspect we won’t be stuck with our Labour counsellors for much longer… Feeling let down and disappointed this morning.   
    • Another glowing review for Niko the plumber. I found his details on the forum after we had a water leak. He was able to come round same day and fixed our problem. He was very reasonable and did a great job.    His number is 07818 607583.   Matt 
    • Putin's little helpers (like theTelegraph) TRUMPeting (sorry not sorry) the fact that UK only gets 10% tariff from uSA as a Brexit Dividend and validating Starmer's qauiescence  Which ignores so much The tariff was calculated on a childish  deficit/exports calculation and ignored any discussion 25% on cars remains in place for UK as well The difference between 10% UK vs 20% EU is a fraction of the cost of Brexit anyway (that cost was dismissed as "worth it" or hand waved away - whereas this relatively small "Win" is heralded as a major victory plus in any case even if UK was on 0%, teh global fallout from this will massively impact UK as a standalone country anyway   Of course not many countries escaped with 0% - oh but Russia did
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...