Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was listening to LBC this morning and they said in eight days America will be broke from my understanding does this mean a stock market crash and a knock effect towards us? I would like to know your thoughts about this I find this sort of thing mind boggling. Forgive me for being a bit dime as I really don?t understand economics when America and Britain borrow money from whom are they borrowing it from?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18653-is-amercia-broke/
Share on other sites

They Borrow money from lenders, anyone willing to buy their debt.


States usually raise money through the issue of bonds.

A bond is basically a bit of paper that states that someone lent the issuer (in the case of your question the UK or US gov't) x amount of money, and it will be repaid to the holder of the paper in n number of years with y amount of interest (hence why they are called Fixed Interest investments).


In this fashion bonds are actually tradeable items and work almost like money. Unlike cash however bonds are subject to risk because the issuer can default on the promise to repay the money, which is effectively what may happen if the debt row can't be sorted out.


So when you ask who do they borrow the money off you're really asking who buys the bonds.

The answer is other countries (These days primarily China), financial institutions (banks, pension funds etc, the low risk character of bonds is useful in helping to offset against higher risk securities like shares, derivatives commodities etc), companies and private investors (think about the war bonds drive of WW2 where they got lots of everyday people to buy gov't bonds in order to quickly raise the money needed to build all those weapons, kit out all those armies and ship them around the world).


It's all a bit more complicated than that obviously, but that's the bare bones of it.

Good summary, mockney.


The US can't repay their loans, so they need to borrow more money. But the Republicans are pushing back, and there is a huge debate raging about the balance of spending cuts, taxation, and borrowing (similar to what we've seen in the UK and Europe).


I'd be surprised if they didn't come to some sort of compromise, the repercussions for the US would be unthinkable. And yes, there would almost certainly be a huge impact to us, and probably the whole world.

The US government is becoming a giant ponzi scheme, skimming money off the top to pay vast sums for things they can no longer afford.

If they resolve this debt crisis they really need to look at ways of bringing down national debt else thy'll lumber from one crisis into another.


Strafer's right in that this isn't actually a financial crisis, as long as people are willing to buy US debt they can keep it going, but like the rest of us there are going to be some severe cuts in order to bring this debt under control. You can bet your bottom dollar (baddam tish) that the first thing to go will be all the medicare stuff Obama fought so hard to push through. These wars are costing a pretty penny too.


But if they do default then government will struggle to function, they will continue to struggle to pay their debts, any new issues will have to be at much higher rates of interest, there will be another banking crisis considering the sheer levels of US debt around the world, the US economy will suffer meaning all our economies will suffer.


Even republican cycnicism won't dare face the consequences of that, but they'll make Obama pay that's for sure.

Ooh, it's like a sort of domestic, financial cuban missile crisis isn't it!!


I posted this elsewhere but it's a nice illustration of the size of the debts the US faces.

http://www.wtfnoway.com/

I am to understand by some sources that the federal reserve is the institution that lends quite a lot of the money the state requires.

I am also to believe there is something fishy about this arrangement, because it is a mainly private institution authorized to have money printed...which it then lends to the state...at interest.

A substantial portion of the taxes raised by the state are then used to service the debt...clever eh?


The Jekyll Island Club source : wikipedia

Main article: Jekyll Island Club


[edit]Planning of the Federal Reserve System

See also: History of the Federal Reserve System

At the end of November 1910, Senator Nelson W. Aldrich and Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Department A. Piatt Andrew, and 5 more of the country's leading financiers, who together represented about one-fourth of the world's wealth[citation needed], arrived at the Jekyll Island Club to discuss monetary policy and the banking system, an event led to the creation of the current Federal Reserve. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the 1910 Jekyll Island meeting resulted in draft legislation for the creation of a U.S. central bank. Parts of this draft (the Aldrich plan) were incorporated into the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. On November 5?6, 2010, Ben Bernanke stayed on Jekyll Island to commemorate the 100-year anniversary of this original meeting.[9]

Forbes magazine founder Bertie Charles Forbes wrote several years later:

Picture a party of the nation's greatest bankers stealing out of New York on a private railroad car under cover of darkness, stealthily riding hundred of miles South, embarking on a mysterious launch, sneaking onto an island deserted by all but a few servants, living there a full week under such rigid secrecy that the names of not one of them was once mentioned, lest the servants learn the identity and disclose to the world this strangest, most secret expedition in the history of American finance. I am not romancing; I am giving to the world, for the first time, the real story of how the famous Aldrich currency report, the foundation of our new currency system, was written... The utmost secrecy was enjoined upon all. The public must not glean a hint of what was to be done. Senator Aldrich notified each one to go quietly into a private car of which the railroad had received orders to draw up on an unfrequented platform. Off the party set. New York's ubiquitous reporters had been foiled... Nelson (Aldrich) had confided to Henry, Frank, Paul and Piatt that he was to keep them locked up at Jekyll Island, out of the rest of the world, until they had evolved and compiled a scientific currency system for the United States, the real birth of the present Federal Reserve System, the plan done on Jekyll Island in the conference with Paul, Frank and Henry... Warburg is the link that binds the Aldrich system and the present system together. He more than any one man has made the system possible as a working reality.[9]

It is more complicated (especially as prices in shops don't include some of the taxes), but they actually have less tax despite having more taxes.

In the US they're much more resistant to raising taxes than we are over here hence why the focus is currently on what is being cut.

Generally Brits are ok with a tax increase if they think the money will be spent wisely, though after new labour.....


Here's a breakdown of relative burdens from here http://www.photius.com/rankings/tax_burden_country_ranks_2009.html (2009, hence the 15% vat rate in uk)

with the overall picture being



As you can see NY is quite high but texas is just cheap as chips!


rank country overall corp pers wealth emp ss pers ss vat

1? France1? 167.9? 34.4? 52.1? 1.8? 45.0? 15.0? 19.6?

2? China? 159.0? 25.0? 45.0? 0.0? 49.0? 23.0? 17.0?

3? Belgium? 156.4? 34.0? 53.5? 0.0? 34.8? 13.1? 21.0?

4? Sweden? 150.7? 26.3? 61.0? 0.0? 31.4? 7.0? 25.0?

5? Netherlands? 146.5? 25.5? 52.0? 0.0? 18.8? 31.2? 19.0?

6? Austria? 144.5? 25.0? 50.0? 0.0? 31.5? 18.0? 20.0?

7? Italy? 139.4? 31.4? 42.3? 0.7? 35.0? 10.0? 20.0?

8? Argentina? 136.3? 35.0? 35.0? 1.3? 27.0? 17.0? 21.0?

9? Finland? 136.1? 26.0? 53.5? 0.0? 27.0? 7.6? 22.0?

10? Greece? 127.1? 24.0? 40.0? 0.0? 28.1? 16.0? 19.0?

11? Brazil? 126.3? 34.0? 27.5? 0.0? 28.8? 11.0? 25.0?

12? Spain? 125.6? 30.0? 43.0? 0.0? 30.2? 6.4? 16.0?

13? Hungary? 124.0? 19.0? 38.0? 0.0? 27.0? 17.0? 23.0?

14? Portugal? 123.3? 26.5? 42.0? 0.0? 23.8? 11.0? 20.0?

15? Japan? 122.6? 41.0? 50.0? 0.0? 13.7? 12.9? 5.0?

16? Germany/Berlin? 120.5? 30.0? 47.5? 0.0? 12.0? 12.0? 19.0?

17? Slovenia? 119.2? 20.0? 41.0? 0.0? 16.1? 22.1? 20.0?

18? Turkey? 118.0? 20.0? 35.0? 0.0? 30.0? 15.0? 18.0?

19? Poland? 116.0? 19.0? 32.0? 0.0? 20.0? 23.0? 22.0?

20? Norway? 116.0? 28.0? 40.0? 1.1? 14.1? 7.8? 25.0?

21? USA/NY City? 115.4? 46.2? 45.5? 0.0? 7.7? 7.7? 8.4?

22? Ukraine? 113.6? 25.0? 15.0? 0.0? 50.0? 3.6? 20.0?

23? India? 113.4? 42.0? 34.0? 1.0? 12.0? 12.0? 12.4?

24? Mexico? 112.5? 28.0? 28.0? 0.0? 38.7? 8.0? 15.0?

25? Switzer/Zurich 111.2? 27.1? 42.6? 0.7? 17.1? 16.1? 7.6?

26? Denmark? 110.5? 25.0? 51.5? 0.0? 1.0? 8.0? 25.0?

27? Luxembourg? 108.8? 28.6? 39.0? 0.0? 13.8? 12.4? 15.0?

28? Malta ? 108.0? 35.0? 35.0? 0.0? 10.0? 10.0? 18.0?

29? United Kingdom? 106.8? 28.0? 40.0? 0.0? 12.8? 11.0? 15.0?

30? Romania? 106.7? 16.0? 16.0? 0.0? 39.2? 16.5? 19.0?

31? Germany? 106.3? 15.8? 47.5? 0.0? 12.0? 12.0? 19.0?

32? Slovakia? 105.6? 19.0? 19.0? 0.0? 35.2? 13.4? 19.0?

33? Canada/Ontario? 105.5? 32.0? 46.4? 0.0? 7.4? 6.7? 13.0?

34? Israel? 104.9? 26.0? 46.0? 0.0? 5.4? 12.0? 15.5?

35? USA/Illinois? 101.6? 42.3? 38.0? 0.0? 7.7? 7.7? 6.0?

36? Azerbaijan? 100.0? 22.0? 35.0? 0.0? 22.0? 3.0? 18.0?

37? Czech Republic? 99.0? 20.0? 15.0? 0.0? 34.0? 11.0? 19.0?

38? Australia? 96.5? 30.0? 45.0? 0.0? 9.0? 2.5? 10.0?

39? Estonia? 95.5? 21.0? 20.0? 0.0? 33.5? 3.0? 18.0?

40? Ireland? 94.8? 12.5? 44.0? 0.0? 10.8? 6.0? 21.5?

41? Lithuania? 94.0? 20.0? 15.0? 0.0? 31.0? 9.0? 19.0?

42? Vietnam? 93.0? 25.0? 35.0? 0.0? 17.0? 6.0? 10.0?

43? Uzbekistan? 93.0? 21.5? 25.0? 0.0? 24.0? 2.5? 20.0?

44? USA/Texas? 92.6? 36.0? 35.0? 0.0? 7.7? 7.7? 6.3?

45? South Korea? 91.7? 24.2? 36.3? 0.0? 14.0? 7.2? 10.0?

46? Latvia? 89.1? 15.0? 23.0? 0.0? 24.1? 9.0? 18.0?

47? Indonesia? 89.0? 30.0? 35.0? 0.0? 12.0? 2.0? 10.0?

48? United States? 85.3? 35.0? 35.0? 0.0? 7.7? 7.7? 0.0?

49? Malaysia? 85.0? 25.0? 27.0? 0.0? 12.0? 11.0? 10.0?

50? Philippines? 84.3? 30.0? 32.0? 0.0? 7.0? 3.3? 12.0?

51? South Africa? 84.0? 28.0? 40.0? 0.0? 1.0? 1.0? 14.0?

52? Thailand? 84.0? 30.0? 37.0? 0.0? 5.0? 5.0? 7.0?

53? New Zealand? 80.9? 30.0? 37.0? 0.0? 0.0? 1.4? 12.5?

54? Kazakhstan? 79.0? 30.0? 10.0? 0.0? 27.0? 0.0? 12.0?

55? Singapore? 78.5? 17.0? 20.0? 0.0? 14.5? 20.0? 7.0?



key

corp - corporate

pers - personal

emp - employer

ss - social security

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone believe that the current argument is

> financial not political?

>

> Surely it's largely born out of the

> republican/Tea Party hatred of Obama? If Bush was

> in power the current limit would be raised without

> the blink of an eye



Me - I agree. I think the US has to face upto this at some point but am suspiciuos on exactly why now

If the US is plunged into turmoil then Obama is screwed for the presidency next year.

Could they be really that cynical and short termist?


I can't believe Obama isn't managing to get the message across that this huge debt is thanks to Bush's tax cuts and spending spree.

  • 4 weeks later...

'I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.'


Thomas Jefferson, 1802.

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.

> If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by

> inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks

> will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent

> their fathers conquered.'

>

> Thomas Jefferson, 1802.


That would be interesting... had Thomas Jefferson ever actually said that. Which he didn't.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
    • Scorpio Dry Cleaners (in the parade of shops at the top of Herne Hill) has closed. The shopfront is being renovated and will be reopened as therapy rooms by Herne Hill Space.  I take this as evidence that we're all more stressed than before, despite being more casually dressed...
    • They do often have very small turning circles (is that the correct term?)  though. Many many moons ago I won a very long Volvo estate car. It could get into a space not much longer than itself, which  was impressive!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...