Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They'll still be loads for her to do....just need to make sure that they will split the kids up by age so she is not hanging round with the others while they queue...I have a 6 and 4yr old and had a pass last year. Most of our trips we made a point of not queuing for anything and they still had a fantastic time.

Just come back from 2 for price of 1 ticket, with a hotel visit. Pleasantly surprised. There is a lot for them to do, from 3 to 7 year olds. The younger rides are not that busy and my 4 and half year old was happy to queue for the bigger rides. The staff were great and really made the day more plesant. I, despite my initial reservations, am now a fan. Lovely grounds and very small child friendly.


(Quick tip when driving there - take the alternative route to legoland when you hit Windsor - really pretty and saves you sitting in traffic!)


Enjoy!

Jim_the_chin, I'm sure q-bot is the way to go, but ?15 per person ON TOP of the already outrageous prices (?41 for adults and ?31 kids) just seems like daylight robbery, esp for the younger kids (under the 130cm limit). AND it extends the waiting times for those in the queues. Several times we got to the front, my son was all excited, and we were told "hang on, sorry, we've got some q-bot guests".


I know that Legoland is always heaving, and obviously they can charge what they like, but the q-bot cost on top of the entrance just seems a bit greedy. A fiver maybe....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agree with @Sue the Dog is awful-nice building awful food. We like The Rossendale and Watsons
    • There are so many variables. Good chefs can having bad nights, post-Brexit staff shortages, your dish might be brilliant, your friend might order something that's inedible. In the end I think the best option is just to go to the restaurant which has the best overall reviews. If all the reviews are bad then avoid, but even if all the reviews are good that's not a cast iron gaurantee. 
    • The trouble is that pub management and chefs are constantly changing, so what might be fantastic on one occasion  becomes terrible a short time later, and vice versa. Two of the worst pub lunches I've had locally were at the Dog in the village and the Plough, but both those were some time ago. We had an absolutely appalling Christmas lunch on Christmas Day at The Cherry Tree, which was also exorbitantly expensive, so unless their chef (I use the term loosely) has changed, I wouldn't advise eating there. The menu looked amazing. We thought we would treat ourselves. Never again 😭
    • If you've seen the original longer post then you'll know that you've taken that out of context. I don't charge but didn't feel I even needed to say that – you've made it sound like I do charge and that's why I deleted this part of the post saying I don't charge. When I read back what I'd written it sounded like I was defending myself against criticisms that hadn't even been made so i cut it out. And now you've made that kind of criticism anyway I should've left it in.  What do you mean "not charging people to read your reviews of their local restaurants."?  You make it sound like i'm sneaking into SE22 from somewhere else. I live here - they are reviews of my local restaurants!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...