Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks Dulwich/Londoner and Sally Eva.


As with most councillors I have a regular full time day job. Being a councillor is something I do in the evenings, weekends and some holiday taken from my paid job around the needs of my family and my regular employer.

  • 2 weeks later...
How about marking car distances, to encourage people not to park with 3/4 of a car length between them and the nearest vehicle. A bit of a 'nudge' to use the available space more efficiently. I reckon you could get several more cars on every street in Dulwich by doing just this.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How about marking car distances, to encourage

> people not to park with 3/4 of a car length

> between them and the nearest vehicle. A bit of a

> 'nudge' to use the available space more

> efficiently. I reckon you could get several more

> cars on every street in Dulwich by doing just

> this.


This.

Every individual bay has to accommodate the longest cars plus manoevering space. A google search indicates a standard 4.8 M, which may be historical, along with individual parking meters. Cars are getting bigger. Wikipedia lists a load of family cars over 4.8M in length so bays installed now would need to be comfortably over 5M in length.


What if there is less than 10M Between adjacent dropped kerbs? Sorry, only room for 1 bay. Furthermore, while the Council is marking it out, they would certainly apply the 2M extensions to dropped kerbs. 5 + 2 + 2 = 9M. Less than 9M between dropped kerbs? sorry, no parking bay.


That is clearly the logic they apply in a CPZ. Double yellow lines everywhere.


Rahrahrah, are you sure that your strategy would be better than allowing most people to be co-operative?

I'm not suggesting meters, or any enforcement. Just that by marking out spaces, you encourage people to park tighter together. That's why I said 'nudge'. My road regularly has cars almost an extra car length apart from one another. If you marked spaces, I believe you would reduce the number of people doing this. Could always pilot it on one street and see what impact it has on behaviour.

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I find the parking across two spaces very annoying

> too but marking them out can achieve the same

> result: I have a small car which is currently

> parked in front of an enormous car which is

> practically twice its size.


I regularly see two small cars taking up enough space for three big vehicles. There is always going to be some underutilisation of space, but by marking out regular spaces, I think over all you would see an increase in capacity across an entire street.

I've avoided asking this as I fear highlighting my stupidity in some areas but...if you're looking at car A and car B and thinking "gosh what a big gap" how do you know that when car A ( or B ) was first parked they were close to an adjacent car which has subsequently driven off ?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not suggesting meters, or any enforcement.

> Just that by marking out spaces, you encourage

> people to park tighter together. That's why I said

> 'nudge'. My road regularly has cars almost an

> extra car length apart from one another. If you

> marked spaces, I believe you would reduce the

> number of people doing this. Could always pilot it

> on one street and see what impact it has on

> behaviour.


When the Grove Vale CPZ was proposed a number of years ago, it became clear even from Southwark's plans that marked out parking bays and double yellow lines would reduce the parking capacity of the zone sufficiently to create greater pressure on residents' parking even without any additional visitor parking. That was one among several reasons why I was very much against it.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When the Grove Vale CPZ was proposed a number of

> years ago, it became clear even from Southwark's

> plans that marked out parking bays and double

> yellow lines would reduce the parking capacity of

> the zone sufficiently to create greater pressure

> on residents' parking even without any additional

> visitor parking. That was one among several

> reasons why I was very much against it.


I think that the reduction in spaces was a function of introducing pay and display bays and extending double yellows plus plans to restrict other parts of streets - e.g. with single yellows. It?s not connected to what rahrahrah is taking about which is just demarcating whatever legal parking space there is into car sized blocks. E.g. like the car parking lines in Crystal Palace sports center. There is no enforcement, it just encourages - nudges - people to park considerately. I?ve seen it put to very good effect in Australia.

RadLuke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> NO - the free parking is one of the most

> convenient things about living aroundhere and it

> is never impossible to find a space, even if

> sometimes you do have a little walk.


^this

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RadLuke Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > NO - the free parking is one of the most

> > convenient things about living aroundhere and

> it

> > is never impossible to find a space, even if

> > sometimes you do have a little walk.

>

> ^this


Agreed

johnie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > RadLuke Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > NO - the free parking is one of the most

> > > convenient things about living aroundhere and

> > it

> > > is never impossible to find a space, even if

> > > sometimes you do have a little walk.

> >

> > ^this

>

> Agreed


Agreed, too.

  • 2 weeks later...

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > How about marking car distances, to encourage

> > people not to park with 3/4 of a car length

> > between them and the nearest vehicle. A bit of

> a

> > 'nudge' to use the available space more

> > efficiently. I reckon you could get several

> more

> > cars on every street in Dulwich by doing just

> > this.

>

> This.


How about ignoring CPZ and instead having signs in the area encouraging people to park closely together for the consideration of others seeking space.

The thing about parking close together is that cars come in so many lengths so, at the moment it looks as though my car is parked across two potential spaces as I squeezed my small car between a motorcycle and a huge old car. This morning, the bike and the big car have both gone and there is 3/4 of a car space between my car and the one that was parked on the other side of the bike. So ?bad parking? is not always to blame for spaces.
I agree, this can happen singalto. But its not always the case, we regularly see people parking inconsiderately, without thought for space being generally limited, but instead just so that's its easy for them to later move out of the bigger space they have utilised.

Outside my house I have space (between two driveways) for 2 'normal' sized cars or one SUV and one small car. They have to abut each other, but each has room to exit the parking space because of the driveway gaps (that is they don't have to leave manoeuvring space between them). Very often however a car will park in the middle of the space, taking thus 2 cars space for themselves.


Luckily my road is not badly parked up, but it still means that parking space is being wasted, and it shows drivers habitually do not try to make best use of space.


Parking between cars is not an easy manoeuvre when you are starting to drive - perhaps even more emphasis should be placed on it in teaching and test situations - the better and more confident you are at parking, the better use you will make of end-to-end parking spaces and the more efficient will be the general use of road-side parking spaces.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought that re ULEZ, but actually other places do have similar schemes, eg Bristol. I got caught by this a couple of years ago when Google maps sent me through Bristol en route to somewhere else. Though I did manage to get the fine waived. And other places are apparently going to have them, eg Oxford. As I found when I was considering selling the car in Oxford. Which I think is a very good thing, but not helpful if your car isn't compliant  Also in order to sell it I would presumably have to get it into working order, so I'd have to buy a new battery anyway. I use mostly buses and trains already, for travelling both within and outside London.  That's why I rarely use the car except for transporting bulky/heavy items, or going to places which aren't easy to reach via public transport, or giving people a lift who are not very mobile. The problem with hiring a car to go to a festival, for example,  is that I'd be paying for it to sit in a field for several days. And it would be impossible, or at least very difficult,  to transport a tent and camping equipment there by public transport. Not that I've been to any festivals lately. I think I'm talking myself into keeping the car. I did do sums when ULEZ came in. I've had a Freedom Pass for over fifteen years, gulp 😂 This is all true, but you have to factor in my age, convenience, and the waste of money in hiring a car if you aren't actually going to use it once you've got to your destination until you need to drive home. If there was a system like zip cars where you could drive somewhere and leave the car for someone else to use, then pick up another car just to drive back, that would be different. And hire charges are greater for older drivers (even though apparently the stats say we are safer) even assuming you can find a company which will hire you a car. Thank you, that's useful. I  keep meaning to  check for ULEZ compliance. A mechanic once told me I should do this, because his son had a similar issue and then found his car was actually compliant, and I never got round to it. It's a Micra so I probably need to contact Nissan (or could a garage check NOx output? Is this part of the MOT?)
    • We used to have local councillors posting on this forum - are there any who are still members?
    • I've never owned a car in the 25 years I've lived in London.  I would regard it as  a hopeless waste of money  I walk, get public transport and taxis for the rare occasions when public transport won't cut it. Anything large that needs to be transporting to or away from my property - well pretty much all shops deliver and for anything  else  there is always someone who willing do it for a small fee. If I need a car to go somewhere outside of London (you would be surprised at how little this issue occurs) then hire cars exist.
    • Hi, we're in a similar position with our old people carrier and did a look back at our usage and then looked at the costs for car clubs, taxis and car hire costs if we got rid of it. In our case the away trips to family, especially during school holidays, makes it cheaper to keep ours and pay ULEZ (the away trips is the big cost for hiring). We rarely use it for local trips and plan usage to aim for multiple purpose trips. We also share with our neighbours such as moving large items with our people carrier and share the ulez cost. Generally for low use alone it will not make financial sense to buy a newer car. Also, if you have a petrol car check its NOx output amount for ULEZ compliance as TFL wrongly categorised many older cars. Did this for neighbours 2001 car and it's ULEZ compliant when TFL originally said it was not (now fixed) and having the same issue with a 1997 petrol car.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...