Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lordship could do with some livening up, i'm in favour of this and tats in general, should i feel the urge for another it'll save me a trip to Camden.


As for the haters, if you dont like them dont get one.


p.s. please retain the contact details of attractive girls that get them as tats are awesome on women.

As a few others have said it might be a bit expensive to open in Lordship Lane but somewhere nearby would be fine I think. Northcross Road would be ideal but anywhere visible should do the trick. It's a small area so word would get around quickly anyway, especially if you did plenty of leafletting. And maybe a few more tattoos in the area might stop some people thinking they are only for sailors and convicts.

Please try and steer away from associating tattoo's and artists with drugs/alcohol. Tattoo artists are very professional and drug/alcohol free who take their work and customers very seriously.


Thanks for all your feedback. Everyone has been very helpful and I have taken everything into considering.


Thanks again and hope to see you soon. Please feel free to message me.


Pete

Silverfox, you snob; get back to Dulwich Village!


Good luck pedropowers - yes it would suit the people of this area and fit in well. I'm too old for my first tattoo now, but I would'nt mind some more piercing if you did that too.


I'm a great fan of LA Ink on the Discovery Channel; if you are really successful maybe you could invite Kat over. I can hear her now "This is East Dulwich, Babe, where anything can happen; I'm Kat Von Dee and this is (insert name of your shop)".


Cheers!

Before any new business opens anywhere, it's suitability and benifit to the local community needs to be considered.


Would a Tattoo Parlour be of benifit to the Majority of the Community. Threre are places withing a 10-15 minute

walk where one can get a tattoo.


In various passed Threads on what East Dulwich needs, I cannot remember anyone suggesting a Tattoo Parlour.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not true dulwichfox

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,284269,284556#msg-284556


What I said was true..


I said, I cannot remember anyone suggesting a Tattoo Parlour.


Ok there was someone, but most of the suggestions were for M&S and Waitrose which I do remember..


Cannot read every line of every thread.


Not that sad...

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> And how exactly did I qualify for this honour?

>



I wouldn't call being an unapologetic and unpleasant snob an honour. But since you ask, describing tattoos as 'cheap and demeaning' is offensive, frankly. And you may not like David Beckham, but the man has put his money where his mouth is with his footballing academy and can put what he wants on his body. He's a good father and - a rarity in modern footballers - a decent role model for hard work.

You're saying that you are the arbiter of taste and decency, and that you're opinion of what is good and right should dictate whether or not a tattoo shop should open near us.


Nimbyism and arrogance of the highest order. Just because you don't like looking at it isn't a reason to tell others they can't look like that.


As for Silverfox...wow. Were you mugged by a tattood person in your youth or something? You bigoted freak. Get a sense of perspective and stop being a hater. Or get to the Village where your way of life isn't threatened.

Disgusting.



If a tattoo place isn't wanted here then it will fail within a few months. If it survives then it's because there;s business for it. How people think that it will lower the tone of the area is beyond me.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Is it? I think it's cheap and demeaning. I realise

> in this country I'm probably in a minority. What

> happens though when they are not trendy? I think

> David Beckham is a disgrace and sets a terrible

> example.



So how exactly did I put words in your mouth?

Alan - yes, fair enough. I did put words in your mouth there.


Let me rephrase.


I believe that anyone who describes tattoos as 'cheap and demeaning' is ignoring the fact that many others think differently, and is ignorant of the fact that it is a PERSONAL CHOICE.


I believe that to describe David Beckham in the way you did is wrong, and it GIVES ME THE IMPRESSION that you feel a tattoo place should not be opened round here, simply because you don't like how they look.

I have a theory... that the fashion for tatoos is why there has been a massive drop in the number of under 40 year olds giving blood. I heard this on the radio last week but no one made the connection between tatoos and the decline in numbers


If I am right then no, I dont want a tattoo shop!

This is from the current advice for potential UK blood donors. It doesn't look drastically prohibitive.


"If you have had any body piercing including permanent and semi permanent makeup and tattooing, or acupuncture outside the NHS and not perfomed by a qualified Health Care Professional registered with a statutory body, please wait 4 months from your last piercing before donating. If your treatment was between 4 and 12 months ago, you must let us know as your donation will need an additional blood test."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
    • I look to the future and clearly see that the law of unintended consequences will apply with a vengeance and come 2029 Labour will voted out of office. As someone once said 'The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...